Is Barrack Hussin Obama Crying?

[SJJRSJJS]

It sure looks like Obama is crying to me, probably because he knows that he failed as a President, he struck out/dropped the pass and the ball game is over. After Romney wins, there will strill be repercussions over the failed Benghazigate situation, and that is another reason to cry, maybe The Hillary should start balling also, no pun intended Monica
http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/335522184945151f200f6a7067001359.jpg

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

yeah, he wept like a Tebow in Iowa last night.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

If Romney wins, we probably won't read another word about Benghazi. Because the whole "scandal" was a fabricated political tool.

 

[Rationalist]

When you've spent over a year of your life campaigning, things are going to get emotional. It's inevitable. Now, I do think Obama honestly wishes things could be different...and better. He's a well-meaning guy. He's simply in over his head.

Soon, he'll be relaxing on the beach in Hawaii with not a care in the world. This is best for everyone.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

If Romney wins, we probably won't read another word about Benghazi. Because the whole "scandal" was a fabricated political tool.

Um... no, it is not. What we will find out after the election is the details on:

1) Fast and Furious
2) Benghazi
3) Unemployment rate

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Um... no, it is not. What we will find out after the election is the details on:

1) Fast and Furious
2) Benghazi
3) Unemployment rate

There is no Benghazi scandal. There will be an investigation, and if it shows that there was lying or a cover-up, THEN you'll have a scandal.

Right now, there is no scandal, except for the one that was created.

 

[evince]

bohner cries when his car gets washed

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

There is no Benghazi scandal. There will be an investigation, and if it shows that there was lying or a cover-up, THEN you'll have a scandal.

Right now, there is no scandal, except for the one that was created.

Actually there is. Pretending it doesn't exist until after the election has been the Dem mantra since 9/11

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Actually there is. Pretending it doesn't exist until after the election has been the Dem mantra since 9/11

Sorry, there isn't - unless you're a devotee of Fox, who reported that forces were ordered to stand down, and that pleas for help were ignored. Both of which were later debunked by intel officials.

If you're so sure there is a scandal, perhaps you can enlighten us on the "scandalous" actions of the admin during Benghazi? No Fox links, now. What do you have?

 

[SJJRSJJS]

When you've spent over a year of your life campaigning, things are going to get emotional. It's inevitable. Now, I do think Obama honestly wishes things could be different...and better. He's a well-meaning guy. He's simply in over his head.

Soon, he'll be relaxing on the beach in Hawaii with not a care in the world. This is best for everyone.

I agree with your comment, but I do not want Socialism, nothing is really invented under Socialism, no monetary incentive, and Obama is a Socialist. There are some Liberal ideas that I support, such as a woman's right to choose. I base that on the facts that the wealthy will get abortions, like Marilyn Monroe did, while the poor will get it done in some alley with a coat hanger. The solution is to terminate the pregnancy very early on, so if the woman waits until the fetus is truely formed, it's more difficult, and no late term, AKA Partial Birth, abortions unless the life of the Mother is involved. Another issue is that there should never be homeless people, not in a Country as well off as this one

 

[evince]

Bohner cries when he gets a boner

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Sorry, there isn't - unless you're a devotee of Fox, who reported that forces were ordered to stand down, and that pleas for help were ignored. Both of which were later debunked by intel officials.

If you're so sure there is a scandal, perhaps you can enlighten us on the "scandalous" actions of the admin during Benghazi? No Fox links, now. What do you have?

Ahhh yes, the standard... 'u must listen to Fox' line of bullshit from the left. No, I do not listen to Fox. I don't actually listen to any TV news outlet nor radio.

Um... neither of those has been debunked. What the hell are you smoking?

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/01/opinion/bennett-benghazi-obama/index.html

By the way, do link us up to whatever it is you think debunked the claims.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Bohner cries when he gets a boner

And you gag, when he does.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Ahhh yes, the standard... 'u must listen to Fox' line of bullshit from the left. No, I do not listen to Fox. I don't actually listen to any TV news outlet nor radio.

Um... neither of those has been debunked. What the hell are you smoking?

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/01/opinion/bennett-benghazi-obama/index.html

By the way, do link us up to whatever it is you think debunked the claims.

Holy hackery, batman - you go all false-outrage on the Fox thing, and then post an opinion piece by BILL BENNETT as your backup?

A senior intel official gave a press conference last week, and said they never gave orders to stand down, and that no calls for help were denied. You should do some research before screaming "scandal!"

It's not enough to want to believe there was a scandal. There has to be some "there" there.

 

[Rationalist]

Bohner cries when he gets a boner

You are a pathetic whore. I can't wait to shove Romney's victory in your sorry face. Only ~5 hours...

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

You are a pathetic whore. I can't wait to shove Romney's victory in your sorry face. Only ~5 hours...

Did USF's repeated use of sexual degradation today get you excited and lead to your making this post?

This is how a board becomes hostile to women.

USF comes on here with one hand on the keyboard and another on his inch and half as usual, no one says anything to him, and the cyber gang bang is on as alllll the pigs join in .

And this board is hostile to women.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Holy hackery, batman - you go all false-outrage on the Fox thing, and then post an opinion piece by BILL BENNETT as your backup?

A senior intel official gave a press conference last week, and said they never gave orders to stand down, and that no calls for help were denied. You should do some research before screaming "scandal!"

It's not enough to want to believe there was a scandal. There has to be some "there" there.

Link us up...

1) The requests for added security were not met
2) The requests for help were not met... the 'senior intel' person... did he/she work for State or the CIA? again... link us up to your source
3) The piece was on CNN... but I see you plan to demean anyone and any site that dares show there are major issues that haven't been answered... six weeks after the attack

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Link us up...

1) The requests for added security were not met
2) The requests for help were not met... the 'senior intel' person... did he/she work for State or the CIA? again... link us up to your source
3) The piece was on CNN... but I see you plan to demean anyone and any site that dares show there are major issues that haven't been answered... six weeks after the attack

It's an easy find - the press briefing was reported by all of the major news outlets, even Fox (though in small font).

Which brings us to another interesting thing about the accusations you righties make. All of a sudden, the onus of proof is no longer on those making the accusations? Can you just say anything you want to then, and it's on me to disprove it?

That's fascinating stuff. None of what you are accusing the admin of has been proven, and YES, it was a CIA official who said that reports that orders were given to stand down were false, as were claims that calls for aid were ignored.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

It's an easy find - the press briefing was reported by all of the major news outlets, even Fox (though in small font).

If it is so easy to find, you should have no problem linking us up to it. Why do you continue to hide?

Which brings us to another interesting thing about the accusations you righties make. All of a sudden, the onus of proof is no longer on those making the accusations? Can you just say anything you want to then, and it's on me to disprove it?

YOU made the claim that both had been debunked. That is what I am asking you to link us to. You said yourself just now that it was easy to find. Why are you making such a big deal of providing the link then?

That's fascinating stuff. None of what you are accusing the admin of has been proven, and YES, it was a CIA official who said that reports that orders were given to stand down were false, as were claims that calls for aid were ignored.

I am not stating anything has been proven you dolt. I am saying these are the questions that need to be addressed. The admin is clearly stalling until after the election.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

If it is so easy to find, you should have no problem linking us up to it. Why do you continue to hide?



YOU made the claim that both had been debunked. That is what I am asking you to link us to. You said yourself just now that it was easy to find. Why are you making such a big deal of providing the link then?



I am not stating anything has been proven you dolt. I am saying these are the questions that need to be addressed. The admin is clearly stalling until after the election.

I'm not hiding anything; if you are following Benghazi enough to accuse the admin of "scandal!", you would know about that development.

As for "questions that need to be addressed," we agree - but it is the answers to those questions that will determine if this is a scandal, or not. Right now, there is no "scandal", as I stated initially.