Right Wingers Attack US Military

I decided to do a little investigating of my own.

Here is a picture of Jill Kelly
PetraeusKelleyCrop_247795c.jpg




Here is a picture of Paula Broadwell
broadwell-book-1.jpg



They could pass as sisters. Obviously, the General prefers the dark haired gals. So, the question is, "Do blondes really have more fun?"
 
Take a good look at what this has come to:

The Associated Press ‏@AP
Senior Defense official: Some of the 20,000-plus emails between Gen. John Allen and Jill Kelley were 'flirtatious.' http://apne.ws/ZCEP61

Tweeted by the AP moments ago.

BREAKING NEWS. Get a look at that. BREAKING: General flirts.

For christ sakes get a hold of yourselves people.
 
blackascoal said:
And the person responsible will never get out of jail.

There are more people who die from a drug overdose of legal drugs than those who died on 9/11.

Exactly .. one has nothing to do with the other.

Why do democrats continue to think this is no big deal?
Click to expand...

MUST
PROTECT
OBAMA
MUST
PROTECT
OBAMA
MUST
PROTECT
OBAMA
MUST
PROTECT
OBAMA
MUST
PROTECT
OBAMA
 
blackascoal said:
Maybe not .. but the adage that power attracts women remains true .. even for plain guys like this one ..

lupica12n-1-web.jpg
Click to expand...

Yes, that is true. Though it would behoove men to do a little thinking first. I am the last one to be against a little boning, even "illicit" in nature, but when you are in a position like this you should ask questions first before you drop your trousers.

Looks like he picked a chatty one:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/12/paula-broadwell-benghazi-cia-petraeus

That is the first interesting thing I have read about Benghazi btw.
 
Darla said:
Yes, that is true. Though it would behoove men to do a little thinking first. I am the last one to be against a little boning, even "illicit" in nature, but when you are in a position like this you should ask questions first before you drop your trousers.

Looks like he picked a chatty one:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/12/paula-broadwell-benghazi-cia-petraeus

That is the first interesting thing I have read about Benghazi btw.
Click to expand...

I have a theory about this. I think men and women have the same sexual urges, I am not one who believes men cant' control themselves and women can. We both have drives and individual drives vary but that is not gender-based.

Women just have more practice thinking first, men have their hands on their zippers within seconds. So my theory is this is because women have spent their whole lives having to think first:

Are My Legs Waxed/Shaved Above My Knees?

See, that is why women think first and bone second, and men bone first and think later. Because men have never been forced, since puberty, to ask themselves that question.
 
blackascoal said:
And the person responsible will never get out of jail.

There are more people who die from a drug overdose of legal drugs than those who died on 9/11.

Exactly .. one has nothing to do with the other.

Why do democrats continue to think this is no big deal?
Click to expand...


It's not clear to me what "this" is and if it's Benghazi, what the big deal is.
 
Darla said:
Take a good look at what this has come to:

The Associated Press ‏@AP
Senior Defense official: Some of the 20,000-plus emails between Gen. John Allen and Jill Kelley were 'flirtatious.' http://apne.ws/ZCEP61

Tweeted by the AP moments ago.

BREAKING NEWS. Get a look at that. BREAKING: General flirts.

For christ sakes get a hold of yourselves people.
Click to expand...


20 to 30,000 emails isn't flirting...And its really on a few hundred emails....20 to 30,000 pages worth.
......its obsession...its mental illness.....these aren't teenagers we're talking about....this is a GENERAL in Marine Corps....


Or as Obama would say...the Marine Corpse...

we'll get a grip, you get a clue.
 
Rokin Kat said:
Benghazi? We had more people killed in a movie theatre in CO than in Benghazi.
Click to expand...

The individual responsible in CO is also already behind bars and we know the details of what happened and why. There is no cover up by the leader of the free world. It is nice to see how little lives are valued by the Dems though.
 
Darla said:
Yes, that is true. Though it would behoove men to do a little thinking first. I am the last one to be against a little boning, even "illicit" in nature, but when you are in a position like this you should ask questions first before you drop your trousers.

Looks like he picked a chatty one:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/12/paula-broadwell-benghazi-cia-petraeus

That is the first interesting thing I have read about Benghazi btw.
Click to expand...

560837-jill-kelley-petraeus-scandal.jpg


paulabroadwell.jpg


I blame God.

Oh Lawd .. why did you curse us with this.

:0)
 
Darla said:
I have a theory about this. I think men and women have the same sexual urges, I am not one who believes men cant' control themselves and women can. We both have drives and individual drives vary but that is not gender-based.

Women just have more practice thinking first, men have their hands on their zippers within seconds. So my theory is this is because women have spent their whole lives having to think first:

Are My Legs Waxed/Shaved Above My Knees?

See, that is why women think first and bone second, and men bone first and think later. Because men have never been forced, since puberty, to ask themselves that question.
Click to expand...

Men have the curse.

Seriously.
 
bravo said:
20 to 30,000 emails isn't flirting....its obsession...its mental illness.....these aren't teenagers we're talking about....this is a GENERAL in Marine Corps....

Or as Obama would say...the Marine Corpse...

we'll get a grip, you get a clue.
Click to expand...


This is just weird. Really. Mental illness to have email correspondence with someone?

General Allen is the guy I feel worst for here. He got dragged into this for the crime of sending emails to a woman that a gung ho FBI agent had a crush on.
 
From the OP...

Darla said:
This seriously disturbs me. I would like to know, what is wrong with you people??? Conservatism is a mental disease, I can see that. Apparently there is no cure.

How did the investigation into Petraeus begin? A right wing FBI agent hoping to "get" President Obama, that's how. Sounds like Lois Freeh all over again. These people don't care about America - they hate America. This is disgusting, a fucking disgrace.

Link to right wing american-hating FBI thug here.

Link to the destruction of General Allen by right wing FBI thug hoping to "git" President Obama, here.

I could go on all day about how this makes our country look - disgracing General Allen like this. And about the right wing scum who will merrily flush their country down the toilet while our enemies laugh at us, in order to "git" the President of the United States as long as said President is a Democrat. Scum. Anti-American scum.

But there is a structural problem which allowed this to happen here and that is this goddamned bullshit about adultery being a crime in the military. There is zero excuse for that and it has to go.

Today, the United States of America is a laughing stock all over the world thanks to right wing scum who hate their country, and antiquated prudish military codes that belong in another century and I don't mean the last one either.

In the meantime - congratulations righties! You really "got" president obama by taking down the head of the CIA who was for years considered a likely REPUBLICAN Presidential candidate, and out top military commander in Afghanistan. If by President Obama you mean you really "got" America.

Traitorous scum.
Click to expand...

Dungheap said:
Clearly an expression of opinion, not fact.
Click to expand...

Hilarious

I'm so old I remember when self-described libertarians weren't into the surveillance state.
Click to expand...

Hilarious. This is not about a surveillance state. When talking about the head of the CIA, we are talking about potential security breaches. She was right to notify the FBI if she felt someone had access to the head of the CIA's activities. They were right to investigate.

You understand the difference between random viewing of emails or surveillance of an individual and following up to a complaint that involves the head of the CIA???

No, of course you don't.
 
Superfreak said:
Hilarious. This is not about a surveillance state. When talking about the head of the CIA, we are talking about potential security breaches. She was right to notify the FBI if she felt someone had access to the head of the CIA's activities. They were right to investigate.

You understand the difference between random viewing of emails or surveillance of an individual and following up to a complaint that involves the head of the CIA???

No, of course you don't.
Click to expand...


Like I said . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top