Company praised for firing woman who took disrespectful photo next to soldier's grave

evince said:
dear fucking idiot,

read the thread, people are calling for burning her at the stake.


She did something stupid and has paid a huge price already.


why does the right have NO compassion for human beings?
Click to expand...

So you want to take away their freedom of speech!! :palm:
 
evince said:
dear fucking idiot,

read the thread, people are calling for burning her at the stake.


She did something stupid and has paid a huge price already.


why does the right have NO compassion for human beings?
Click to expand...

Dear fucking retarded cunt, no one was killed, your posting habits implied that someone had.
Try to get a grip.

Once my neighbours found a joint in their teen sons bedroom.
The dad said ' I will kill him when I get hold if him'.

Should dad be jailed for murder?

What say you dope cunt?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Since no one was shot, you statement is a strawman; but an answer would be:

No; you would not have infringed on their freedom of speech, by shooting them.
You would have infringed on their right to live; because we have no right to kill someone, unless it falls within the parameters set forth by society.
Click to expand...

That is not specifically covered in the constitution.
 
evince said:
dear fucking idiot,

helping people is compassion wether your twisted brains accepts that fact or not.

Let them eat cake is NOT compassion
Click to expand...
Helping those who need help is compassion.
Being taken for a fool by lazy manipulative people is idiotic.
 
Jarod said:
So who here belives she should be shot?
Click to expand...
No one, anymore straw man arguments?
She was fired because her actions could have a negative effect on her employers public image.

Glad she was fired to be honest!
 
Jarod said:
Was she off duty at the time of this dispicable act?
Click to expand...
Yup, and her employers public image would have been irreparably damaged had he not fired her.
It would have been viewed as tacit approval.
The boss made his decision, just as she made hers!
That's the way if it in a grown up society!
 
007 said:
Yup, and her employers public image would have been irreparably damaged had he not fired her.
It would have been viewed as tacit approval.
The boss made his decision, just as she made hers!
That's the way if it in a grown up society!
Click to expand...

I can understand why the employer did as he did, but I do not belive that keeping her employed is in anyway tacit approval. Personally, if she were the best for the job, I would have wanted to keep her. If I was not going to survive as a business if I kept her, I would likely cave on what I felt was right and let her go.
 
Someone who behaved like that would not likely have been employed by me in the first place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top