Fox News interview ends after...

Its obvious the pinheads don't watch Fox......see, this is standard on Fox....it happens at least couple of times a week.....

The Fox interviewer asks question......instead of a direct answer he gets a lengthy irrelevant hack answer and spin, a little bit of filibuster and an attack on
Fox hoping the controversy will hype his book sales.....
The result is what you see.....his 'interview' is over.....if you won't answer the questions, you're gone.....he was allowed to finish his rant....Fox always lets them finish a good rant....he wasn't cut off in the middle of anything...

O'Reilly probably would have lashed out some and put the hack in his place before showing him he door.....Scott just said thanks but no thanks.....

So nothing here to see that you can't see a couple of times a week at least.....Spin and no response and you're history.

MSNBC does not allow ANY type of dissent to air on their network at all and guys like Bill Maher like to keep the odd at 4 to 1 if he does get someone from the right
to come on his show.....

Now let the whining and name calling begin.....
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
Its obvious the pinheads don't watch Fox......see, this is standard on Fox....it happens at least couple of times a week.....

The Fox interviewer asks question......instead of a direct answer he gets a lengthy irrelevant hack answer and spin, a little bit of filibuster and an attack on
Fox hoping the controversy will hype his book sales.....
The result is what you see.....his 'interview' is over.....if you won't answer the questions, you're gone.....he was allowed to finish his rant....Fox always lets them finish a good rant....he wasn't cut off in the middle of anything...

O'Reilly probably would have lashed out some and put the hack in his place before showing him he door.....Scott just said thanks but no thanks.....

So nothing here to see that you can't see a couple of times a week at least.....Spin and no response and you're history.

MSNBC does not allow ANY type of dissent to air on their network at all and guys like Bill Maher like to keep the odd at 4 to 1 if he does get someone from the right
to come on his show.....

Now let the whining and name calling begin.....
Click to expand...

Fox lies and whines to spin reality and you're gullible enough to repeat it. Fox is even saying he apologized privately but he say's it never happened so I'm sure there will be more Fox spin for you to repeat.
 
Haiku said:
Fox lies and whines to spin reality and you're gullible enough to repeat it. Fox is even saying he apologized privately but he say's it never happened so I'm sure there will be more Fox spin for you to repeat.
Click to expand...


I seriously doubt if Fox will mention it again.....why give him or his book any free hype at all.....its over....
You don't answer the question the interviewer asks.....that pretty much ends you air time....its done often on Fox.....they say no spin and they mean no spin....

Just a few days ago, MaCain was being asked about Ms. Rice and gave a "non-response, response", was called on it and then proceeded to smile and actually
answer in an appropriate way.....no one gets a break.....too bad pinheads don't see it for themselves and just get whatever spin huffington or msnbc gives them......

but pinheads remaining willfully ignorant means little to me....
 
Mott the Hoople said:
No kidding man. That should be the first clue to the brain dead that Fox News is a propaganda organ. Facts are not "fair and balanced".
Click to expand...


At least you're half right.....facts are not 'fair and balanced'.....they're facts....ie. the truth.....

Spinning those facts are whats 'unfair and unbalanced'.....thats the whole issue with the Ricks interview....

The facts are clear....he dodged the interviewers question, accused the network of bias and the interview was terminated....those are the facts....

The rest is spin.....not unlike Mott's post. He would never bad mouth MSNBC or Maddow or Ed Shultz, etc....but O'Reilly gets put down every day of the week.

My comment was that I've seen this happen more than once on Fox....especially with O'Reilly....otherwise
its not an interview. Its becomes an argument on some matter usually unrelated to the subject of the interview....a hack fest and hype.
Come to think of it, I've seen these things happen even on the Letterman show and Bill Maher.....it usually ends in a change of the subject or going to another guest.
 
Last edited:
Liberty said:
There's no news that's fair and balanced.
Click to expand...

If only the facts and no supposition or conjecture is presented it is fair. Balanced now requires reporting facts both good and bad for both partys.

As when the fairness doctrine was in place.
 
Rokin Kat said:
If only the facts and no supposition or conjecture is presented it is fair. Balanced now requires reporting facts both good and bad for both partys.

As when the fairness doctrine was in place.
Click to expand...

There is no need for a 'fairness doctrine" in a land with free speech and a free press. Dumb ass.
 
Rokin Kat said:
If only the facts and no supposition or conjecture is presented it is fair. Balanced now requires reporting facts both good and bad for both partys.

As when the fairness doctrine was in place.
Click to expand...

Ah someone for more government control, see the definition of "cattle"
 
i truly cannot believe how dumb and dishonest many liberals are.

FACT: the interview did NOT end after the accusation. that is a complete lie. it ended after the anchor asked him why and rick gave an answer to that.

can we please get some more intelligent and honest liberals on this board...please....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top