War on Men?

Damocles said:
Because nobody was talking about it, and I toned down the title from the original article deciding to use light irony I turned around an election point presented by the left. In this case it is the men who are getting (less of) it from the government... literally. Lean "Forward"... You need to pay for a life saving test that they deem unworthy.
Click to expand...
First...the article has merit. That test is indeed inconclusive, especially if blood was taken after a prostate exam. Said exam will elevate PSA.

Second...I see nothing that proves insurance will no longer cover PSA tests.
 
Jarod said:
Im enjoying watching you back out of this one.
Click to expand...

And I enjoy watching those on the left, including you, incapable of speaking on the topic immediately resorting to an attempt to "kill the messenger". Basically, I changed the title of the article because when I post crap like this without comment and don't change the title Dungheap tries to say I wrote the title anyway, this time he'd have finally been right.

Can you actually speak on this topic without using the ad hom fallacy method of "argument"? (Ad hom would be fine, if you actually contributed to the discussion in some other way, so far all you have is an attempt to distract, dodge, and mislead without speaking even a minute amount on the actual topic.)
 
Damocles said:
Because nobody was talking about it, and I toned down the title from the original article deciding to use light irony I turned around an election point presented by the left. In this case it is the men who are getting (less of) it from the government... literally. Lean "Forward"... You need to pay for a life saving test that they deem unworthy.
Click to expand...


No one is getting less of anything from anyone. Literally.
 
Damocles said:
And I enjoy watching those on the left, including you, incapable of speaking on the topic immediately resorting to an attempt to "kill the messenger". Basically, I changed the title because when I don't Dungheap tries to say I wrote the title anyway, this time he'd have finally been right.
Click to expand...

There is no topic to discuss. A group of independent Doctors did a study and found that a type of analysis was ineffective? Whats to discuss, other than the fact that you questioned if it was a "War on Men?"
 
Dungheap said:
So the "War on Men" consists of an independent advisory panel originally create in the 1980s making non-binding recommendations about preventive health care services that should be covered by insurance based upon its review of the academic literature? The same panel that recommended a change to initial mammograms a few years ago?

Interesting.
Click to expand...

can you read? if there is a war on women...then this proves there is a war on men.

get it...got it....good.
 
Jarod said:
There is no topic to discuss. A group of independent Doctors did a study and found that a type of analysis was ineffective? Whats to discuss, other than the fact that you questioned if it was a "War on Men?"
Click to expand...

They didn't do a study, this only indicates you didn't read the article.
 
Damocles said:
They didn't do a study, this only indicates you didn't read the article.
Click to expand...

"First, the task force measures the effect of testing on the death rate from any disease (all-cause mortality)."

The act of measuring the effect of testing on the death rate is a STUDY. UGH!
 
Jarod said:
"First, the task force measures the effect of testing on the death rate from any disease (all-cause mortality)."

The act of measuring the effect of testing on the death rate is a STUDY. UGH!
Click to expand...

No, that is not a study. Not only that but they misapplied the statistical data (from others, hence not a study) in order to support a pretext. You still haven't read the article fully.
 
Damocles said:
No, that is not a study. Not only that but they misapplied the statistical data (from others, hence not a study) in order to support a pretext. You still haven't read the article fully.
Click to expand...
Fact...if you get a high PSA result, the first thing they do is another test.

What does that tell you?
 
Dungheap said:
Let's assume for purposes of argument that there is a war on women, how specifically does the OP prove there is a war on men?
Click to expand...

Because the YurTard says so GODAMNIT!

Don't you DARE question his intelligence...he knows the correct definition of words better than Merriam Webster.

Check out the thread with my name in it for proof.
 
Damocles said:
No, that is not a study. Not only that but they misapplied the statistical data (from others, hence not a study) in order to support a pretext. You still haven't read the article fully.
Click to expand...

To me, applying data (accuratly or inaccuratly) is a study. Its not an experiment and its not data collection, but it is a study.
 
Jarod said:
To me, applying data (accuratly or inaccuratly) is a study. Its not an experiment and its not data collection, but it is a study.
Click to expand...


They are circling the wagons and going into "word parsing mode".

They intend to bog this discussion down in verbal minutiae and Damo is laying the groundwork.
 
Dungheap said:
Let's assume for purposes of argument that there is a war on women, how specifically does the OP prove there is a war on men?
Click to expand...

i guess you don't understand irony as a form of argument

i'm mocking the war on women. i hope this clears things up for you.

enjoy your day good sir.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top