christiefan915
Catalyst
I don't, i'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy on your side.
If I don't take their word for anything, and I'm on "that side", isn't it possible there are others like me?
I don't, i'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy on your side.
Try not to be such a moron. My supposition is that the nose in the 2nd picture looks nothing like the nose in the first picture. My supposition is that somewhere out in cyberspace there's an anonymous face looking for its nose that was photoshopped onto GZ. My supposition is that when the reports state that GZ had two black eyes but the pictures don't show it, something's fishy.
from what i read, that photo was from the prosecution. why would the prosecution photoshop the photo?
and you did in fact state that because there was no black eye, that it was indicative that he did not break his nose. sorry that my response to your words makes you think i'm a moron.
The picture, posted Monday on Zimmerman's defense website, was taken by a police officer, Zimmerman's attorneys wrote.
The state had previously provided a black-and-white copy of the image, the attorneys wrote on the website. "This high resolution digital file was finally provided to the defense on October 29."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/03/justice/george-zimmerman-photo/index.html
Don't count your chickens. We heard the same thing about the laughpocolypse and gloatathon that was going to take place when Romney won the election.
Didn't we?!!! Endlessly for months!!!
No one took into account all the illegal aliens voting illegally using their fake birth certificates to get their legal driver's licenses in order to be voter registered, so they could vote for Food Stamp Obama. The truth will come out one day and then they will all be saying; "Can't We All Get Along?"Didn't we?!!! Endlessly for months!!!
then you don't see very well. your supposition sucks. it's easily noticeable that it's the same nose when you look at the wounds on both pictures.Try not to be such a moron. My supposition is that the nose in the 2nd picture looks nothing like the nose in the first picture. My supposition is that somewhere out in cyberspace there's an anonymous face looking for its nose that was photoshopped onto GZ. My supposition is that when the reports state that GZ had two black eyes but the pictures don't show it, something's fishy.
others like you? with an inability to suspend disbelief? i'm sure there are.If I don't take their word for anything, and I'm on "that side", isn't it possible there are others like me?
![]()
Umm ... same night, different nose.
what state is that? here in TX, you can stop those two from walking away, using lethal force if necessary.
What factual story...this is all pre-trial. You seem to think GZ can make a claim to 'stand your ground'....I think your out of your mind. Zimmerman is the only one left with a voice...he killed the person who might have something different to say.
Don't count your chickens. We heard the same thing about the laughpocolypse and gloatathon that was going to take place when Romney won the election.
Of course it is. This would've been plastered everywhere by Zimmy's defenders MONTHS ago if it were real. It isn't.
Calm down Grind I don't want you to blow out an artery because of my post. Black eyes are a very common side effect of broken noses. Google it if you don't believe me.
watching zimmerman get acquitted will definitely be better than if romney had won. It's going to be the laughpocolypse on here from me. I can't wait. Breaking bad is in july, the zimmerman trial is in june. I am looking more forward to the zimmerman trial.
then you don't see very well. your supposition sucks. it's easily noticeable that it's the same nose when you look at the wounds on both pictures.
others like you? with an inability to suspend disbelief? i'm sure there are.
Yes, black eyes can be a result of a broken nose. CAN BE. it is not always the case. It DEPENDS on the location and degree of the break. Why is that so hard to comprehend?
the lack of ability to acknowledge time differences is amazing with some of you. it's obvious by both pictures that nothing is photoshopped because you can see the scabbed over wounds on both parts of his nose, so it SHOULD seem logical to believe that there is some considerable time difference between the two pictures...so how is it that you need to jump to the photoshop conclusion?Go to Google Images or the Sanford Herald and type in "George Zimmerman". You'll find dozens of photos... close up, full body, far and near. Not one of those photos shows the nose in the condition of the above photo. Supposedly it was a "high definition" picture. How much "higher definition" can you get than this close-up taken the same night?![]()
If you think this isn't a deliberate ploy to try and portray GZ as the victim and justify his shooting an unarmed teenager, you're living in a fool's paradise.