How long can Bitch and Boner hold out?

S

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Poll: Raise Taxes on the Rich

[SIZE=+1] Link[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]
[/SIZE]Americans prefer letting tax cuts expire for the country's top earners, as Obama insists,
while support has declined for cutting government services to curb budget deficits, an poll shows.
Fewer than half the Republicans polled favor continuing the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy.

There's also a reluctance to trim Social Security, Medicare or defense programs, three of the
biggest drivers of federal spending, the survey released Wednesday found. The results could
strengthen Obama's hand in his fiscal cliff duel with Republicans, in which he wants to raise
taxes on the rich and cut spending by less than the GOP wants.

I saw another poll that says IF we go off the fiscal cliff,
it will be the Republican's fault.

In the past, when Obama had the winning hand with the math and the people on his side,
he always caved in to whatever the snarling-dog Republicans demanded.

Will we see the same-old President Mouse?
Or will Obama stand up and act like a man?

Bart

boner-counter_offer-12.jpg


boner-half-wealth_n.jpg
 
The GOP is basically conceding that they'll raise taxes on the wealthy from what I'm reading. They finally realized that they lost the election.

That won't cover it, though. Very curious to see how the rest of the deal looks.
 
We often argue whether sources are credible or not, too right or left wing. But I have to give it to ken for this one. What is the source of your article? Bart. Is that a news agency? No, it's just this dude. How did you find out about Bart? A couple of the bro's I smoke weed with like know this dude Bart. He's killer man.
 
Thing1 said:
The GOP is basically conceding that they'll raise taxes on the wealthy from what I'm reading. They finally realized that they lost the election.

That won't cover it, though. Very curious to see how the rest of the deal looks.
Click to expand...

yet they won the house

why is it libs think the only race was the WH?

blindness?
 
cawacko said:
We often argue whether sources are credible or not, too right or left wing. But I have to give it to ken for this one. What is the source of your article? Bart. Is that a news agency? No, it's just this dude. How did you find out about Bart? A couple of the bro's I smoke weed with like know this dude Bart. He's killer man.
Click to expand...

No way. Ken agreed with an opinion? WTF.
 
cannabis said:
Why Did the Republicans Win the House?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/why-did-the-republicans-w_b_2110673.html

LOL...you have a low IQ rune, stop lying that you have a high IQ...they won the majority of the house, eg, they won the house retard
Click to expand...

From your own link retard (read much?):

Indeed, more than half-a-million more Americans voted for Democratic House candidates than for Republicans House candidates. There was no split-decision. The Democrats won both the presidential election and the House election
 
that is what i get for just reading the title. apparently he is as retarded as you. in your bizarro world, winning a majority of the house means you didn't win the house

:rolleyes:
 
cannabis said:
that is what i get for just reading the title. apparently he is as retarded as you. in your bizarro world, winning a majority of the house means you didn't win the house

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You could acurately say they held the house, in spite of losing seats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top