Photo of bloodied, broken nosed George Zimmerman released

cannabis said:
it is already proven

you lied about what USF said and what SF said

anyone can see the lies if they read back a few posts
Click to expand...


You mean it's your OPINION that I lied.

It is clear from the post I provided that USF believes Zimmerman is innocent.

You may not LIKE that fact, but it's clear to everyone.

Everyone that is, but partisan clowns like you who refuse to acknowledge what's written right in front of you.

Don't sweat it. Everyone besides the other hate filled posters understand that it's your hatred that keeps you from admitting I was right.
 
"it's clear to everyone"

yet even damo agreed with me that USF did not claim he was innocent

"everyone"

indeed, the voices in your crack baby head
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Well, that would be your OPINION and you are welcome to it, but I would venture that YOUR opinion is tainted by your own partisan attitude towards certain posters here.

YOU state you think Zimmerman is innocent and it's obvious from his post that USF feels the same way.
Click to expand...

Actually, no. First I don't state that I think he is innocent, in fact I have said several times I am unsure while I state that the evidence we've seen doesn't even come close to a realistic assumption of guilt. This is based on what I have seen of the evidence, not on what other people say. When the story first broke I was whole on "your" side. Evidence has made me pause and point out that we should really wait. The evidence I have seen that has been brought forward really isn't good on conviction.

This stuff reminds me entirely of the Schiavo idiocy in which I was for family rights, the right of a husband to make that kind of choice for his family, and against the partisans on "my" side that you suppose I somehow follow. This isn't something that should be partisanly run by emotion. This is a trial, and he is due his hearing in court without a taint of the jury pool based on partisan politics. Armchair Jurists who have made their decision before the evidence ever was shown should be shown the door. Whether that choice is innocent or guilty.

I predict that GZ will be acquitted if, and this is a big if, the evidence we've seen is all they have.
 
cannabis said:
"it's clear to everyone"

yet even damo agreed with me that USF did not claim he was innocent

"everyone"

indeed, the voices in your crack baby head
Click to expand...


ZappasGuitar said:
but it's clear to everyone. Everyone that is, but partisan clowns like you.
Click to expand...
...and Damo

Too bad you can't be counted on to post the ENTIRE QUOTE.

Odd, seeing as how you're forever whining about that very infraction when it's done to you.

Whoopsie...forgot for a second I was dealing with ol "do as I say and not as I do" Yurt.

How silly of me...LOL!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
...and Damo

Too bad you can't be counted on to post the ENTIRE QUOTE.

Odd, seeing as how you're forever whining about that very infraction when it's done to you.

Whoopsie...forgot for a second I was dealing with ol "do as I say and not as I do" Yurt.

How silly of me...LOL!
Click to expand...


Do you ever make a post that doesn't contain a personal attack on someone .....?
 
Damocles said:
Actually, no. First I don't state that I think he is innocent, in fact I have said several times I am unsure while I state that the evidence we've seen doesn't even come close to a realistic assumption of guilt. This is based on what I have seen of the evidence, not on what other people say. When the story first broke I was whole on "your" side. Evidence has made me pause and point out that we should really wait. The evidence I have seen that has been brought forward really isn't good on conviction.

This stuff reminds me entirely of the Schiavo idiocy in which I was for family rights, the right of a husband to make that kind of choice for his family, and against the partisans on "my" side that you suppose I somehow follow. This isn't something that should be partisanly run by emotion. This is a trial, and he is due his hearing in court without a taint of the jury pool based on partisan politics. Armchair Jurists who have made their decision before the evidence ever was shown should be shown the door. Whether that choice is innocent or guilty.

I predict that GZ will be acquitted if, and this is a big if, the evidence we've seen is all they have.
Click to expand...

good post
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top