There are no equal rights when it comes to having children

Aoxomoxoa said:
I thought we were talking about homosexual couples??
Click to expand...

Well, a homosexual male and a homosexual female could have a child together. Lot's of homosexuals have children that are their own and were conceived with out any technological help. But I don't see how technological help would change anything, why they should be denied it's use or prohibited from adopting.

The point he is trying to make is stupid. We have been using tools for a long time now. They have even impacted our evolution and the evolution of animals and plants we have domesticated.

He can't defend himself but we let him use the products of science and technology to make himself feel safe. That's somehow natural, I guess. But others should be denied the use of technology because he thinks their sex acts are icky? What kind of assinine reasoning is that?
 
I Love America said:
So you don't care about children? Duly noted puddin pop
Click to expand...

No, it is you who is saying you don't care about children. By denying gays the ability to adopt children, you remove a sizeable chunk of the people looking at adopting children. Many gays have adopted "at risk" children and children with special needs. But trying to push your agenda, you are limiting the number of people who are willing and able to adopt these children.
 
I Love America said:
So you hate children and science? The science is clear. Children do best in two parent homes with a mother and a father. Homosexual homes have too much domestic violence and are too unstable. Do you want children growing up in domestic violence?

Have you no shame?
Click to expand...

If that is your case then you would have no problem removing children from any home with any domestic violence at all?
 
SuperstringTheory said:
You brought it up in post 46 and said...

You know I speak truth. Thousands of years of human experience say it is so. Evolution says it is so. Homosexuals were not meant to be parents, otherwise evolution would have allowed for it. You do believe in evolution don't you?

Evolution has not biologically selected out for homosexuals and they can procreate. There is no "point" to evolution. Again, not a conscious force. There is no will behind it. It just is.

Many if not most homsexuals have had sex with members of the opposite sex.
Click to expand...

You are purposely being obtuse and you know it. A homosexual coupe cannot procreate. It is biologically impossible.

They can only procreate with a member of the opposite sex at which point they are no longer engaging in homosexual behavior. They are engaging in heterosexual behavior which is evolutionarily normal.

Using your logic, I can argue that gays can already marry. They just have to marry the opposite sex as evolution intended
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
NO, HE DIDN'T.
He smeared the people who lived next door to your G-parents and those people were in an incestuous relationship.
Click to expand...

And I didn't smear them. It would have been a smear if they weren't committing incest. But, according to Desh they were. Just calling a spade a spade.

Desh is a coon ass
 
I Love America said:
You are purposely being obtuse and you know it. A homosexual coupe cannot procreate. It is biologically impossible.

They can only procreate with a member of the opposite sex at which point they are no longer engaging in homosexual behavior. They are engaging in heterosexual behavior which is evolutionarily normal.

Using your logic, I can argue that gays can already marry. They just have to marry the opposite sex as evolution intended
Click to expand...

They dont have to engage in sexual behavior at all.

Homosexuals are capable of being parents. You argued that evolution somehow prevents them from doing that and that that proves they are not fit parents.

Now you believe evolution has intended for us to marry? You do know thay you dont have to be married to procreate?

You clearly don't understand what evolution is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top