Medical Questionaire

Superfreak said:
sorry, did you not just mention Eric Holder in the post I quoted? Let me guess, you don't think Holder is part of the Obama admin? Is it because he is black? Are you a racist?
Click to expand...

SF, by "this" I assume DH meant the medical questionairre. It has nothing at all to do with Obama or the ACA. This is not an example of ... must defend Obama, must defend Obama, must defend Obama... but must blame Obama.
 
SuperstringTheory said:
SF, by "this" I assume DH meant the medical questionairre. It has nothing at all to do with Obama or the ACA. This is not an example of ... must defend Obama, must defend Obama, must defend Obama... but must blame Obama.
Click to expand...

String... either pay attention to what I quoted when I said that or remain silent so that you don't appear so foolish.
 
Dungheap said:
It works better as an insult if you say that I am the worst, not that I "would be the worst." But you're VASTLY more intelligent than me, so I'm sure you don't need me to show you where the bear shit in the buckwheat.
Click to expand...

Thanks for once again proving what a fucking moron you are.
 
Superfreak said:
String... either pay attention to what I quoted when I said that or remain silent so that you don't appear so foolish.
Click to expand...

You are the one looking like the fool with your insistence on knee jerk reactions. My attention is fine and I am not distracted by your strawman.

DH made a sarcastic response to Mott, about the unthinking, knee jerk reactions of those like ILA and bravo. You responded with knee jerk reaction...

Must defend Obama administration... must defend Obama administration
Click to expand...

What in the world does this have to do with the Obama administration?
Click to expand...

THIS, the question asked by WB's doctor, has nothing at all to do with Obama, ACA or Holder. The entire premise is false. There is no need to defend Obama. He had nothing to do with it.
 
SuperstringTheory said:
You are the one looking like the fool with your insistence on knee jerk reactions. My attention is fine and I am not distracted by your strawman.
Click to expand...

What straw man? See, there you go playing the fool again. There was no straw man. I responded directly to his sarcastic reply.

DH made a sarcastic response to Mott, about the unthinking, knee jerk reactions of those like ILA and bravo. You responded with knee jerk reaction...
Click to expand...

No String, I mocked his sarcastic post. It was not a knee jerk reaction. You are simply overly defensive because you were not bright enough to recognize what was written for what it was.

THIS
Click to expand...
, the question asked by WB's doctor, has nothing at all to do with Obama, ACA or Holder. The entire premise is false. There is no need to defend Obama. He had nothing to do with it.
Click to expand...

Funny, you whine and cry about straw men and then you go and create your very own. I never stated, not once, that my response was in reference to the question WB's doctor asked. My response was to Dungs post. That is it. I also did not state Obama. I said the Obama administration, which included Holder. Holder was mentioned by Dung. Let me know when you decide to stop building straw men and you actually catch up to what was stated.
 
bravo said:
Bullshit !
Click to expand...

Perhaps before you scream like a baby perhaps you should take the words he used "people with guns in home more likely to commit suicide", and type them into Google. Here's the first thing to come up:

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/160/10/929.full

The risk of dying from a suicide in the home was greater for males in homes with guns than for males without guns in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 10.4, 95% confidence interval: 5.8, 18.9). Persons with guns in the home were also more likely to have died from suicide committed with a firearm than from one committed by using a different method (adjusted odds ratio = 31.1, 95% confidence interval: 19.5, 49.6). Results show that regardless of storage practice, type of gun, or number of firearms in the home, having a gun in the home was associated with an increased risk of firearm homicide and firearm suicide in the home.
Click to expand...

In case you don't understand English, what that says is that you're wrong.
 
WinterBorn said:
I am going in for my annual physical and to check on a few things. Since I have relocated, I am using a new medical group. They emailed me a Medical History Questionaire. Most of it is pretty standard stuff.

But one section is called PEVENTION. It is a series of Yes/No questions. Most seem reasonable, like asking if I smoke, drink alcohol, drink coffee, have a "Living Will" ect. But one question is "If there is a gun in your home, is it out of children's reach and unloaded?".

WTF?

First of all, in my home the answer would be yes and no. It is out of reach but it is loaded.

But my main question is what the hell does this have to do with my medical history? I didn't answer the question, since I think we can proceed with my physical without the doctor knowing about how I store firearms.




Has anyone else run into this question at their doctor's office?
Click to expand...

I got that when I switched to my companies health plan. I just answered N/A. No one pressed. But I also CC/OC when I go in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top