Greenland ice SIMPLY WOULD NOT MELT in baking +8°C era 120k years ago

Thing1 said:
The conclusion of the OP really says nothing about global warming.
Click to expand...

and the title of the thread doesn't either. It takes ONE of the computer models the AGW crowd have put forth and shows the model to be wrong.

It isolates one possible effect that climate change could have on the planet & treats it like some sort of gospel that the overall conclusions as far as consequences go are false. This represents a very small piece of the larger POV on this topic, as well as the models you refer to.
Click to expand...

Where in that article are you seeing that it tries to dispel the overall conclusions of all consequences?

Have you ever heard anyone say that every aspect of every forecasting model is 100% accurate as a predictor?
Click to expand...

You are dipping into straw man making again. No one said that it had to be 100% accurate. But this isn't even close. It is shown to be wrong. Just this one model. This one portion of the claims. But that is what scientists do. They take claims one by one and either validate them or invalidate them. This article shows the model for Greenland is wrong.
 
Superfreak said:
and the title of the thread doesn't either. It takes ONE of the computer models the AGW crowd have put forth and shows the model to be wrong.



Where in that article are you seeing that it tries to dispel the overall conclusions of all consequences?



You are dipping into straw man making again. No one said that it had to be 100% accurate. But this isn't even close. It is shown to be wrong. Just this one model. This one portion of the claims. But that is what scientists do. They take claims one by one and either validate them or invalidate them. This article shows the model for Greenland is wrong.
Click to expand...

I really fail to understand what these guys are on about, this is the normal way science works not via blogs, single issue campaign groups or vested interests.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
I really fail to understand what these guys are on about, this is the normal way science works not via blogs, single issue campaign groups or vested interests.
Click to expand...

Some people are so vested in the AGW theory that they cannot accept anything that chips away at it.
 
tinfoil said:
LOL the warmers can't even understand the topic
Click to expand...

Yeah - it's so sophisticated.

I love the irony on this thread of AGW-ridiculers like tinfoil & SF using the same cherrypicking, generalization & consensus claims that they hate out of the AGW crowd. It's really delightful.
 
Let's face it, The biggest problem the world faces is a population that is growing at a massive rate, From 1.5 Billion to over 7 Billion in just 100 years!!

Hell a teenager tried to point that out to Hillary Clinton.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/15953972/bindi-irwin-slams-hillary-clinton-editors-over-essay/

Apparently Hillary Clinton or her staff didn't agree -_- I say we look at finding a way to terraform Mar's or even get an FTL up and running. Bring Earth's BS and Drama to the whole Galaxy
 
von_noobie said:
Let's face it, The biggest problem the world faces is a population that is growing at a massive rate, From 1.5 Billion to over 7 Billion in just 100 years!!

Hell a teenager tried to point that out to Hillary Clinton.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/...win-slams-hillary-clinton-editors-over-essay/

Apparently Hillary Clinton or her staff didn't agree -_- I say we look at finding a way to terraform Mar's or even get an FTL up and running. Bring Earth's BS and Drama to the whole Galaxy
Click to expand...

That's pretty disgusting but I can't say that I'm that surprised.
 
What cherry picking? Describe what's been picked and what field of results it's been picked from and I'll see if I agree. I'm not immune to confirmation bias and if you show me where I'm wrong, I'll be happy to correct my views. I yearn to be correct. Do you?
 
von_noobie said:
Let's face it, The biggest problem the world faces is a population that is growing at a massive rate, From 1.5 Billion to over 7 Billion in just 100 years!!

Hell a teenager tried to point that out to Hillary Clinton.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/15953972/bindi-irwin-slams-hillary-clinton-editors-over-essay/

Apparently Hillary Clinton or her staff didn't agree -_- I say we look at finding a way to terraform Mar's or even get an FTL up and running. Bring Earth's BS and Drama to the whole Galaxy
Click to expand...

The Zombie Apocolypse will resolve this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top