Hilary; More popular than ever before

everyone knows hilary will be the frontrunner. You have to be a political retard to not see that.

I too, think it's dangerous to establish royal lines in our country, as I have stated before in other threads. There are plenty of other qualified people to pool from, but family names is just an opiate for the prole unthinking masses that see the neon sign of clinton or bush and vote without any real reason or intellect behind their decisions.

P.S. there is no fucking chance in hell she wins texas. Are we honestly believing she'll turn texas blue?
 
everyone knows hilary will be the frontrunner. You have to be a political retard to not see that.

I too, think it's dangerous to establish royal lines in our country, as I have stated before in other threads. There are plenty of other qualified people to pool from, but family names is just an opiate for the prole unthinking masses that see the neon sign of clinton or bush and vote without any real reason or intellect behind their decisions.

P.S. there is no fucking chance in hell she wins texas. Are we honestly believing she'll turn texas blue?


Unless, they pass an immigration bill, then Texas could go real blue.
 
Unless, they pass an immigration bill, then Texas could go real blue.

can you democrats just be honest for once and just admit you want mexicans to come into our country to build up a perma voting block? I am always honest about my nefarious secret plans... why can't democrats be? Everyone knows that's why we are letting them in.. just admit it.
 
It was with you guys. Or maybe you can list 10 things that made BO better than Hillary?

The only difference I could see is that he was black and it made you libs feel really cool to vote for a black guy.
Obama got the young vote.
Now the young people are
1. aware of who Hilary is.
2. aware of who you shitheels are.
 
can you democrats just be honest for once and just admit you want mexicans to come into our country to build up a perma voting block? I am always honest about my nefarious secret plans... why can't democrats be? Everyone knows that's why we are letting them in.. just admit it.

Everyone with two complete brain cells knows it is the GOP letting them in.
 
everyone knows hilary will be the frontrunner. You have to be a political retard to not see that.

I too, think it's dangerous to establish royal lines in our country, as I have stated before in other threads. There are plenty of other qualified people to pool from, but family names is just an opiate for the prole unthinking masses that see the neon sign of clinton or bush and vote without any real reason or intellect behind their decisions.

P.S. there is no fucking chance in hell she wins texas. Are we honestly believing she'll turn texas blue?

Are we honestly believing that Bill, the best president of the modern era will have no input?
 
can you democrats just be honest for once and just admit you want mexicans to come into our country to build up a perma voting block? I am always honest about my nefarious secret plans... why can't democrats be? Everyone knows that's why we are letting them in.. just admit it.

You want honest?
Bring in the messicans! I love enchiladas and don't want all those years of Spanish class to go to waste


Ole gringo!
 
everyone knows hilary will be the frontrunner. You have to be a political retard to not see that.

I too, think it's dangerous to establish royal lines in our country, as I have stated before in other threads. There are plenty of other qualified people to pool from, but family names is just an opiate for the prole unthinking masses that see the neon sign of clinton or bush and vote without any real reason or intellect behind their decisions.

P.S. there is no fucking chance in hell she wins texas. Are we honestly believing she'll turn texas blue?

I didnt say she wouldn't be the front runner, I just don't think she will be the nominee. Everything you hear today they said in 2007 but back then she didn't have the middle east failures hanging around her neck.

If the dems think Rubio will be the nominee they won't let GOP elect first hispanic president. Hillary is finished. Well she actually was a never was.

Can anyone really name any accomplishments other than being a doormat for the men in her life that she has accomplished of substance?
 
I didnt say she wouldn't be the front runner, I just don't think she will be the nominee. Everything you hear today they said in 2007 but back then she didn't have the middle east failures hanging around her neck.

If the dems think Rubio will be the nominee they won't let GOP elect first hispanic president. Hillary is finished. Well she actually was a never was.

Can anyone really name any accomplishments other than being a doormat for the men in her life that she has accomplished of substance?


Bluster, blow and puff; talk about lack of substance!
 
Bluster, blow and puff; talk about lack of substance!

OK, I will give you a third chance because I am a magnanimous soul. If she is so wonderful, and great and would make such a wonderful President, why did the democrats reject her in 2008?

Why did you choose BO over Hillary? And why wouldn't you guys choose someone else over her next time around? The point is that if conventional wisdom were correct, the 2008 nominees would have been Rudy Guiliani and Hillary Clinton and Clinton would be President Clinton.

So you can say the post lacks substance, but it would appear it is only because you don't like the facts not because you can refute anything.
 
You are not paying attention. I already explained it in an earlier post, but since you are so persistent I will help you again.

OK, I will give you a third chance because I am a magnanimous soul. If she is so wonderful, and great and would make such a wonderful President, why did the democrats reject her in 2008?
It's not as simple as you would like.
There was a rising groundswell of support for the young, well spoken black Senator.
The turning point was when Ted threw his support to Obama.
Think about it, either we would have our first black or our first female Pres., a huge win for progressives either way. Democrats hardly rejected her, there was simply a much more exiting (to many) choice.
Why did you choose BO over Hillary?
I didn't, in fact my state voted for Hilary in the primary. Ted made a mistake.

And why wouldn't you guys choose someone else over her next time around?

Perhaps we will, if a better option appears between now and then.
Don't forget, Hilary has to want to run.

If Christie had run, Obama would have been a one term president.

The other thing is Hilary is 65. She may not be up for a brutal battle at 69.
If she doesn't get her hair style together, she may not get a chance. She is starting to look like a nut and should go back to her earlier shorter styles.
The point is that if conventional wisdom were correct, the 2008 nominees would have been Rudy Guiliani and Hillary Clinton and Clinton would be President Clinton.
Screw CW. Who gives a shit?
So you can say the post lacks substance, but it would appear it is only because you don't like the facts not because you can refute anything.

Nope, guess again.
 
Hilary is more popular than ever?

Of course, she isn't in office allowing her people to be murdered, getting involved in cover ups and lies, faking injury and illness to avoid taking responsibility!

Her popularity jumped as soon as she left office!!
 
You are not paying attention. I already explained it in an earlier post, but since you are so persistent I will help you again.


It's not as simple as you would like.
There was a rising groundswell of support for the young, well spoken black Senator.
The turning point was when Ted threw his support to Obama.
Think about it, either we would have our first black or our first female Pres., a huge win for progressives either way. Democrats hardly rejected her, there was simply a much more exiting (to many) choice.
I didn't, in fact my state voted for Hilary in the primary. Ted made a mistake.



Perhaps we will, if a better option appears between now and then.
Don't forget, Hilary has to want to run.

If Christie had run, Obama would have been a one term president.

The other thing is Hilary is 65. She may not be up for a brutal battle at 69.
If she doesn't get her hair style together, she may not get a chance. She is starting to look like a nut and should go back to her earlier shorter styles.

Screw CW. Who gives a shit?

Nope, guess again.

So BO beat Hillary only because he was "more exciting"? You libs sure are a substantive bunch aren't you? I know you won't admit it, but you just admitted that the only reason you libs supported BO was because he is half black.

Like I said, the dems want to make sure the hispanics stay on the plantation. They know the blacks aren't goin anywhere. They got em right where they want em. Stupid, poor and helpless. The dems aren't so sure of their hold on the hispanics so they will run a hispanic.
 
So BO beat Hillary only because he was "more exciting"?
Yes. Hilary would have gotten some of the republican female voters which is why Mcain choose the beauty princess. Obama was so exciting that millions of voters registered just to vote for him. The excitement far overwhelmed the more obvious choice of Clinton/Obama, which would have given Obama the experience he needed, among other benefits, such as another Clinton directed economy which is apparently needed after every Bush admin.

The silver lining is that other than the drone war, Obama has been a good ambassador to the world.

You libs sure are a substantive bunch aren't you? I know you won't admit it, but you just admitted that the only reason you libs supported BO was because he is half black.
Obama, in very well crafted and spoken speeches gave the impression that he would govern very differently than Bush. Being smart and black generated excitement for sure, but is hardly the only reason. Such efforts to globally simplify everything are what generates the pejoratives I usually add to my replies..
Like I said, the dems want to make sure the hispanics stay on the plantation. They know the blacks aren't goin anywhere. They got em right where they want em. Stupid, poor and helpless. The dems aren't so sure of their hold on the hispanics so they will run a hispanic.

There goes that overly simplistic thinking again. If you are just trolling, score one for you.
The same thinking hired Palin, causing an otherwise reasonable conservative, veteran senator as well as veteran war hero to lose to a completely inexperienced 1st term senator.

If only it were really that simple.
 
Yes. Hilary would have gotten some of the republican female voters which is why Mcain choose the beauty princess. Obama was so exciting that millions of voters registered just to vote for him. The excitement far overwhelmed the more obvious choice of Clinton/Obama, which would have given Obama the experience he needed, among other benefits, such as another Clinton directed economy which is apparently needed after every Bush admin.

The silver lining is that other than the drone war, Obama has been a good ambassador to the world.

Obama, in very well crafted and spoken speeches gave the impression that he would govern very differently than Bush. Being smart and black generated excitement for sure, but is hardly the only reason. Such efforts to globally simplify everything are what generates the pejoratives I usually add to my replies..

There goes that overly simplistic thinking again. If you are just trolling, score one for you.
The same thinking hired Palin, causing an otherwise reasonable conservative, veteran senator as well as veteran war hero to lose to a completely inexperienced 1st term senator.

If only it were really that simple.

I am just focusing on YOUR words. Nothing more nothing less. I keep asking for the other substantive reasons and all you can do is come back and substantiate my contention that it was only because he was black.

I notice you use no words about his competence or experience. In fact you even admit he was inexperienced. It is hilarious to watch you confirm what I am saying yet try to say you aren't actually saying it.

These are you words cracker
 
I am just focusing on YOUR words. Nothing more nothing less. I keep asking for the other substantive reasons and all you can do is come back and substantiate my contention that it was only because he was black.

I notice you use no words about his competence or experience. In fact you even admit he was inexperienced. It is hilarious to watch you confirm what I am saying yet try to say you aren't actually saying it.

These are you words cracker

It is hilarious to watch you ignore the other words I used, simpleton.
 
It is hilarious to watch you ignore the other words I used, simpleton.

You were pretty clear. He beat Hillary because he was exciting. He was exciting because he was "smart and black" which I presume to mean that you libs think that most other blacks aren't smart. Is Al Sharpton "smart and black"? What about Jesse Jackson? Is he "smart and black"?

Oh you threw in the "that wasn't the only reason", but you failed to give any others.

I asked you why libs dumped Hillary for BO and all you could come up with was that he was "smart and black" as if there aren't other "smart black" men out there. You have had multiple opportunities to cite other reasons for the BO love, but all you could come up with was that he was black.

Don't be bitter about it. I appreciate your honest. I just find it curious that you guys scream racism when we point out that you libs voted for him because he was black when you admit as much
 
Back
Top