The Sequester and the Tea Party

Rune

Mjölner
The Sequester and the Tea Party Plot


Thursday, February 28, 2013 Imagine a plot to undermine the government of the United States, to destroy much of its capacity to do the public’s business, and to sow distrust among the population.
Imagine further that the plotters infiltrate Congress and state governments, reshape their districts to give them disproportionate influence in Washington, and use the media to spread big lies about the government.
Finally, imagine they not only paralyze the government but are on the verge of dismantling pieces of it.

Far-fetched? Perhaps. But take a look at what’s been happening in Washington and many state capitals since Tea Party fanatics gained effective control of the Republican Party, and you’d be forgiven if you see parallels.

Tea Party Republicans are crowing about the “sequestration” cuts beginning today (Friday). “This will be the first significant tea party victory in that we got what we set out to do in changing Washington,” says Rep. Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), a Tea Partier who was first elected in 2010.

Sequestration is only the start. What they set out to do was not simply change Washington but eviscerate the U.S. government — “drown it in the bathtub,” in the words of their guru Grover Norquist – slashing Social Security and Medicare, ending worker protections we’ve had since the 1930s, eroding civil rights and voting rights, terminating programs that have helped the poor for generations, and making it impossible for the government to invest in our future.
Sequestration grew out of a strategy hatched soon after they took over the House in 2011, to achieve their goals by holding hostage the full faith and credit of the United States – notwithstanding the Constitution’s instruction that the public debt of the United States “not be questioned.”

To avoid default on the public debt, the White House and House Republicans agreed to harsh and arbitrary “sequestered” spending cuts if they couldn’t come up with a more reasonable deal in the interim. But the Tea Partiers had no intention of agreeing to anything more reasonable. They knew the only way to dismember the federal government was through large spending cuts without tax increases.

Nor do they seem to mind the higher unemployment their strategy will almost certainly bring about. Sequestration combined with January’s fiscal cliff deal is expected to slow economic growth by 1.5 percentage points this year – dangerous for an economy now crawling at about 2 percent. It will be even worse if the Tea Partiers refuse to extend the government’s spending authority, which expires March 27.

A conspiracy theorist might think they welcome more joblessness because they want Americans to be even more fearful and angry. Tea Partiers use fear and anger in their war against the government – blaming the anemic recovery on government deficits and the government’s size, and selling a poisonous snake-oil of austerity economics and trickle-down economics as the remedy.

They likewise use the disruption and paralysis they’ve sown in Washington to persuade Americans government is necessarily dysfunctional, and politics inherently bad. Their continuing showdowns and standoffs are, in this sense, part of the plot.

What is the President’s response? He still wants a so-called “grand bargain” of “balanced” spending cuts (including cuts in the projected growth of Social Security and Medicare) combined with tax increases on the wealthy. So far, though, he has agreed to a gross imbalance — $1.5 trillion in cuts to Republicans’ $600 billion in tax increases on the rich.

The President apparently believes Republicans are serious about deficit reduction, when in fact the Tea Partiers now running the GOP are serious only about dismembering the government.

And he seems to accept that the budget deficit is the largest economic problem facing the nation, when in reality the largest problem is continuing high unemployment (some 20 million Americans unemployed or under-employed), declining real wages, and widening inequality. Deficit reduction now or in the near-term will only make these worse.

Besides, the deficit is now down to about 5 percent of GDP – where it was when Bill Clinton took office. It is projected to mushroom in later years mainly because healthcare costs are expected to rise faster than the economy is expected to grow, and the American population is aging. These trends have little or nothing to do with government programs. In fact, Medicare is far more efficient than private health insurance.

More at link http://robertreich.org/post/44259531689#.UTKSkGNqcc8.twitter
 
I cant get a handle on if my Republican friends like the sequester cuts or not. I guess they have not distributed talking points yet.

They cant seem to decide if they are for the sequester or not. On one hand they seem to like it, on the other hand they seem to be blaming President Obama for it.
 
I cant get a handle on if my Republican friends like the sequester cuts or not. I guess they have not distributed talking points yet.

They cant seem to decide if they are for the sequester or not. On one hand they seem to like it, on the other hand they seem to be blaming President Obama for it.

When you stop conflating conservatives with republicans you will have your answer. It is clear Boehner enjoys being Obamas bitch. But he knew he couldn't bend over and take in this or he was out. Obama knows he would rather deal with the town crier than a hard line conservative
 
When you stop conflating conservatives with republicans you will have your answer. It is clear Boehner enjoys being Obamas bitch. But he knew he couldn't bend over and take in this or he was out. Obama knows he would rather deal with the town crier than a hard line conservative

So Republicans and Conservatives are two seperate things? I always thought Republicans are on the Conservative side of the spectrum but span from very to moderatly Conservative.

Well, its friends who call themselves both conservative and Republican who like the sequester AND enjoy blaming Obama for it.
 
Imagine a plot to undermine the government of the United States, to destroy much of its capacity to do the public’s business, and to sow distrust among the population.
Imagine further that the plotters infiltrate Congress and state governments, reshape their districts to give them disproportionate influence in Washington, and use the media to spread big lies about the government.
I have. we call them democrats and republicans.
 
I cant get a handle on if my Republican friends like the sequester cuts or not. I guess they have not distributed talking points yet.

They cant seem to decide if they are for the sequester or not. On one hand they seem to like it, on the other hand they seem to be blaming President Obama for it.

the fact that spending is slowing down is good......cutting it would be better......we blame Obama for not doing the cutting intelligently instead of instructing his administration to cut those things that will cause the greatest fear amongst the co-dependents......
 
I cant get a handle on if my Republican friends like the sequester cuts or not. I guess they have not distributed talking points yet.

They cant seem to decide if they are for the sequester or not. On one hand they seem to like it, on the other hand they seem to be blaming President Obama for it.

Talking points should be out in an hour. We'll get back to you then.


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/
 
Back
Top