Same-sex couples begin marrying

I've never advocated for a federal marriage license. Licensing of any kind is the purview of the states.

Gay relationships are inherently unstable, since they are unnatural. Gay men, especially, are some of the least stable people on the planet.
 
I've never advocated for a federal marriage license. Licensing of any kind is the purview of the states.

Gay relationships are inherently unstable, since they are unnatural. Gay men, especially, are some of the least stable people on the planet.

Monogamous relationships themselves are unnatural. A human male has a biological drive to spread his seed to as many females as he can.

Natural is irrelevant, unless you are going to use "natural" as a requirement for all who get the benefits of marriage.

Also, that there is no federal marriage licence is not the point. That the federal gov't recognizes these marriage is the point.


Now, can you answer the question? What benefits do straight couples bring society that gay couples do not?
 
With this logic you could them make the following argument:

"That does not change however my position on bestiality. I have always thought it was silly to focus on if its "natural" or not. Or if people are born that way or not..."

True, and the only reason I belive beastiality should be illegal is because an animal cannot consent.
 
Monogamy is natural. Many species exhibit this behavior, including intelligent humans.

I answered your question in post 241.
 
True, and the only reason I belive beastiality should be illegal is because an animal cannot consent.
Animals make decisions to act or not, therefore they consent. Ever her of the expression: 'herding cats". Cats have to agree to follow you.
 
Get behind me Satan I preach truth, you are an affront to creation by practicing homosexuality, and saying it is natural, and you were created by God to be that way. Repent of your sins, and accept that Christ died for your sins, or burn in Hell.

I'd rather suck dick, Mary.
 
When you try to be clever, you continue to prove what an idiot you are. The above still equates homosexuality to a 'choice' you moron.

I never said it did not.. God you are an idiot. I dont know if its a choice or not, or what percentage of it is a choice... I dont care.
 
Animals make decisions to act or not, therefore they consent. Ever her of the expression: 'herding cats". Cats have to agree to follow you.

Ugh, you are an idiot. Making a decision to act is not the same as consenting to sex. A 12 year old can make a decision to act, they cannot however understand the implications of consenting to sex.
 
I'll bet you a pile of cash that you will, and in less than a decade.

Much less than a decade is my bet. And if the S.Ct does what I think it will, while people may not be able to get married in your state... the marriages performed in other states will have to reconized by your state.
 
Back
Top