Being White in Philly

Darla I posted it for several reasons.

1) The article, the Mayor's response and the 'fallout' have made national news.

2) When the phrase 'We need to have national discussion on race' is used I think that can very different things to different people.

3) An article like this can lead to an excellent discussion. Of course it can lead to a not good discussion as well. But if we are to have this 'national discussion' all people need to talk and be heard and that includes whites and even the dreaded white male. If people don't speak out and listen to each other and learn from each other and understand where each other are coming from things will really never improve.

Well said... even more impressive that a USC grad was able to put more than two words together.
 
Darla I posted it for several reasons.

1) The article, the Mayor's response and the 'fallout' have made national news.

2) When the phrase 'We need to have national discussion on race' is used I think that can very different things to different people.

3) An article like this can lead to an excellent discussion. Of course it can lead to a not good discussion as well. But if we are to have this 'national discussion' all people need to talk and be heard and that includes whites and even the dreaded white male. If people don't speak out and listen to each other and learn from each other and understand where each other are coming from things will really never improve.

The thing is, the discussion can't be one sided.
 
Ah yes, Mr. Semantics is here. Awesome. Darla is doing just that. But you are right, she didn't say those exact words, so you got me. Good job.

Actually, she isn't. I realize you may think that the only way white males can talk about race is by lecturing to black people about race with impunity, but there are other ways.
 
Darla I posted it for several reasons.

1) The article, the Mayor's response and the 'fallout' have made national news.

2) When the phrase 'We need to have national discussion on race' is used I think that can very different things to different people.

3) An article like this can lead to an excellent discussion. Of course it can lead to a not good discussion as well. But if we are to have this 'national discussion' all people need to talk and be heard and that includes whites and even the dreaded white male. If people don't speak out and listen to each other and learn from each other and understand where each other are coming from things will really never improve.

I think it would be a damned shame if the only way we can have a discussion about race is to have it set off by an asshole writing something like what I read here. I happen to not believe it is.
 
In fairness to Superfreak, he did also lecture women on how the GOp was not having a war on women and how stupid we all were for saying that. And then claimed that I and others were filled with hate for telling him he's an asshole and also that we were telling him he wasn't allowed to speak.

So he's not just clueless on race. Let's be fair to Superfreak here.
 
Also, Cawacko, national news? I feel really dumb now, this was the first I have heard of it. I guess I have been wrapped up in Steubinville. I really did not know about this. You know, it's a hard job keeping track of all of the assholes in this world, even in this country, and I will be the first to admit I'm not up to the job. I missed this.
 
I think it would be a damned shame if the only way we can have a discussion about race is to have it set off by an asshole writing something like what I read here. I happen to not believe it is.

What makes him an asshole Darla? Let me guess... because he was a white male and dared to try to discuss the issue, but failed to write as eloquently as you would have?

Or should I have just stopped at 'white male'?
 
In fairness to Superfreak, he did also lecture women on how the GOp was not having a war on women and how stupid we all were for saying that. And then claimed that I and others were filled with hate for telling him he's an asshole and also that we were telling him he wasn't allowed to speak.

So he's not just clueless on race. Let's be fair to Superfreak here.

Darla, you are the one that is clueless on race. You think that white men should be excluded from the conversation because 'what could they know? They are a bunch of oppressors!!!'

You may not like everything that guy said, but he tried to convey the need for dialogue.

But this is how I see it: We need to bridge the conversational divide so that there are no longer two private dialogues in Philadelphia—white people talking to other whites, and black people to blacks—but a city in which it is okay to speak openly about race. That feels like a lot to ask, a leap of faith for everyone. It also seems like the only place to go, the necessary next step.

But you don't care about that do you? You just want to attack him because he was a white guy trying to discuss race.
 
People like Darla are a large part of the problem. She doesn't think white people, especially men, should be able to discuss the issue of race. Obviously the city of Philly thinks otherwise as they are having neighborhood meetings to do just that. Lucky for us they are not as full of hate as Darla.

There is a way to do it though, and I believe the way the article goes about it is the wrong way.
 
Cawacko I couldn't get through all of that. I really couldn't. It was insufferable. The author sounds like a moron and an asshole. If the mayor called him an insufferable moronic asshole, then he hit it right on the nose.

What white person alive in America doesn't "get" why the black woman reacted the way she did to the text about the blackberry? You have got to be kidding me, what a joke.


Liberals and idiots usually respond to the truth just like you did.....you just can't accept the truth when it can be seen as racial, even remotely...

and the black racist that was so offended....predictable.....a totally innocent inquiry by a fellow student and its twisted into a racial attack.....
If any statement can be spun and used to accuse a white of being racist, the liberal morons will find a way to do it....context doesn't matter in the least....
This article is a perfect example.....
=============================

I took my daughter to Temple for a look see and while she toured the college my wife and I walked to local McDonalds.....that setteled the case for me...no way
in this world would I let my kid go to that school even if it was offered free.....gangs roamed the streets with their gang jackets, in packs, forcing people off
the sidewalks, kicking parked autos, and the word motherfuc--r echoed through the air constantly....
Thats just the truth, like it or not....over 20 years now and I'd guess its only gotten worse.....

"If its the truth, it ain't racist"- Poet
 
Actually, she isn't. I realize you may think that the only way white males can talk about race is by lecturing to black people about race with impunity, but there are other ways.

Oh isnt that cute... he took up Darlas nonsense and ran with it. But thanks for proving that you idiots automatically assume a white guy only wants to 'lecture black people about race with impunity'. It is that type of liberal nonsense that I am talking about. A white guy talks about race and you two idiots automatically pretend he is trying to 'lecture black people'.

It is that type of blind accusation that leads people to avoid dialogue on race with others. Because of idiots like you that are so self absorbed that you think your views and opinions are all that matters.
 
Also, Cawacko, national news? I feel really dumb now, this was the first I have heard of it. I guess I have been wrapped up in Steubinville. I really did not know about this. You know, it's a hard job keeping track of all of the assholes in this world, even in this country, and I will be the first to admit I'm not up to the job. I missed this.

Just start with your closest friends, the ones that agree with you the most.....make a list and your off to a good start.
 
Oh isnt that cute... he took up Darlas nonsense and ran with it. But thanks for proving that you idiots automatically assume a white guy only wants to 'lecture black people about race with impunity'. It is that type of liberal nonsense that I am talking about. A white guy talks about race and you two idiots automatically pretend he is trying to 'lecture black people'.

It is that type of blind accusation that leads people to avoid dialogue on race with others. Because of idiots like you that are so self absorbed that you think your views and opinions are all that matters.

Nah, no assumption necessary. I read the article. That's a determination, not an assumption.
 
Back
Top