Same-sex couples begin marrying

Howey, if you posted "And you pedophile rapist apologists wouldn't know what the Southern Strategy was if it hit you in the face with Nixon's maid's watermelon", he has proven it.

Try connecting "pedophile" with "rapist". It was a poorly written and changed to "apologists for peophile rapists".
 
I'm very stable, thank you. Married, three kids, homeowner, small business owner... Faithfull to my wife.
So you experimented with gay before getting married? That's odd, I've been told over and over that gays were born that way. You seem to have chosen your orientation.
 
Try connecting "pedophile" with "rapist". It was a poorly written and changed to "apologists for peophile rapists".
Here you are admitting that you wrote it, yet earlier you are calling me a liar for pointing out that is what you wrote.
 
So you experimented with gay before getting married? That's odd, I've been told over and over that gays were born that way. You seem to have chosen your orientation.

Personally, and I know that everyone is different... I have always been mostly attracted to women, but on a couple ocasions Ive met men who were attractive to me....

I did not decide anything, thats just the way I am. Ive also not "chosen" anything other than to be married in a monogmous relationship. If she were to die, I dont suspect my dating future would be much differnt than it was before I met her.

So are you going to answer my question about being as much a sinner, in your moral code, as a gay person?
 
Try connecting "pedophile" with "rapist". It was a poorly written and changed to "apologists for peophile rapists".

So your justification for calling someone a pedophile is that you called them a pedophile rapist?

I may need to shower for just typing this, but DY is right.
 
So your justification for calling someone a pedophile is that you called them a pedophile rapist?

I may need to shower for just typing this, but DY is right.

Context, my friend, context. For the last time, they were called apologists for rapist pedophiles (the Steubenville rapists), , not pedos. You,re intelligent, you don't see the difference?
 
Oh. This conversation is over. It was discussed with the mods in a pm and the posts were changed to be more clear. If you have a problem, take it up with them in a pm.
 
Personally, and I know that everyone is different... I have always been mostly attracted to women, but on a couple ocasions Ive met men who were attractive to me....

I did not decide anything, thats just the way I am. Ive also not "chosen" anything other than to be married in a monogmous relationship. If she were to die, I dont suspect my dating future would be much differnt than it was before I met her.

So are you going to answer my question about being as much a sinner, in your moral code, as a gay person?
It sounds to me that you are bi-sexual, so you did choose your orientation. And for as long as I've know you you strive towards progressivism, which is basically the definition of instability.

I already have answered your question. Now it's your turn to answer the dick question.
 
It sounds to me that you are bi-sexual, so you did choose your orientation. And for as long as I've know you you strive towards progressivism, which is basically the definition of instability.

I already have answered your question. Now it's your turn to answer the dick question.

Why is it any of your business? I mean, other than to conjure a mental picture?
 
It sounds to me that you are bi-sexual, so you did choose your orientation. And for as long as I've know you you strive towards progressivism, which is basically the definition of instability.

I already have answered your question. Now it's your turn to answer the dick question.

My orientation is the same as it has always been.

I've no intention of answering your vapid question. Where did you answer mine?
 
Last edited:
So now you are going to pretend you already answered.. I see.

You are a joke, and your inability to honestly discuss this illistrates tout instability.
 
I don't care if you like the answer or not, but it was still an answer.

Your turn to answer now, actually long overdo.

I'm curious about something. Quite a while back you tried to make the point that married couples offer benefits to our society. I asked you what benefits were offered by straights being married that would not be offered by gays being married (except for unassisted conception).

I think that question has gone unanswered for several years, hasn't it? Talk about long overdue.
 
Back
Top