2011: Blacks were more than 7 times more likely to be an offender

This tells me I have to be afraid of males no what color they are. Given that 89.5% of all homicides are committed by men.

Once we let women out of the kitchen into the towns and cities, I am sure the figure for females will increase! :)
 
Once we let women out of the kitchen into the towns and cities, I am sure the figure for females will increase! :)
Actually... No. They commit similar drug crimes and a good number of property crimes and commit almost all the prostitution crimes. But if you want violent crime, go men. Maybe if we shot all women up with testosterone they could compete, but otherwise...
 
Actually... No. They commit similar drug crimes and a good number of property crimes and commit almost all the prostitution crimes. But if you want violent crime, go men. Maybe if we shot all women up with testosterone they could compete, but otherwise...

Of course I was being DEADLY serious. Twat.
 
Call me racist all you want, deniers.

It's by definition racism to treat a fellow American you meet differently because they're part of some group, rather than as a fellow American. The vast majority of black people commit no crimes, you think we should treat them as second class citizens because of a small minority? How can we expect to remain united as a nation if we have such an attitude?
 
This tells me I have to be afraid of males no what color they are. Given that 89.5% of all homicides are committed by men.

Yes, that's a good point. If we're going to look at race, why not sex? The picture is much, much bleaker in that regards. If we killed all men besides a small minority (to keep up a breeding stock), we could eliminate 90% of murders and 99% of rapes in one go. Don't we have a responsibility to deal such a violent group, so responsible for so much of societies ills?
 
Yes, that's a good point. If we're going to look at race, why not sex? The picture is much, much bleaker in that regards. If we killed all men besides a small minority (to keep up a breeding stock), we could eliminate 90% of murders and 99% of rapes in one go. Don't we have a responsibility to deal such a violent group, so responsible for so much of societies ills?

Are swamp men who live in places like Mississippi amongst the worst offenders?
 
But you need to look at this more broadly - politics are anecdotal as well. Just because the percentage of African Americans engaging in gun violence is higher than it is in other races doesn't mean you can apply it to all individuals within that demographic. A statistic is a statistic. And this one can't be used to characterize the entire racial group.
 
Yes, that's a good point. If we're going to look at race, why not sex? The picture is much, much bleaker in that regards. If we killed all men besides a small minority (to keep up a breeding stock), we could eliminate 90% of murders and 99% of rapes in one go. Don't we have a responsibility to deal such a violent group, so responsible for so much of societies ills?

But if the 'we' you refer to killed all the men, then 'we' (presumably women) would be guilty of most of the murders and the remaining happy band would have to kill them in turn. Well, at least the restaurants would not be so busy!
 
It's by definition racism to treat a fellow American you meet differently because they're part of some group, rather than as a fellow American. The vast majority of black people commit no crimes, you think we should treat them as second class citizens because of a small minority? How can we expect to remain united as a nation if we have such an attitude?

It's racism to treat someone from one group differently? Does that mean every republican and democrat is a racist? I hate people that went to UCLA and Notre Dame. Racist?
 
Yes, that's a good point. If we're going to look at race, why not sex? The picture is much, much bleaker in that regards. If we killed all men besides a small minority (to keep up a breeding stock), we could eliminate 90% of murders and 99% of rapes in one go. Don't we have a responsibility to deal such a violent group, so responsible for so much of societies ills?

I remember reading somewhere a study was done about differences between male and female criminals and, according to the study (that I can't find at the moment), while men are more likely to commit violent crimes, crimes committed by women are far more likely to be more sadistic in nature.
 
It's racism to treat someone from one group differently? Does that mean every republican and democrat is a racist? I hate people that went to UCLA and Notre Dame. Racist?

In that instance it's bigoted. Racism is bigotry applied to race. I know every non-Ohioan gets this (which isn't racist because it implies Ohioans are human, which they aren't), but I figured you might need some explaining.
 
It's probably a good idea to send all the blacks back to where they came from...then the hispanics...the french...the gays....the heathens...the germans.....the british. Problem is though, if you get rid of everyone you dont like, who would think for you?
Words of a sniveling America hater.

The best thing to do is start with our illegal immigration problem and work from there.
 
Words of a sniveling America hater.

The best thing to do is start with our illegal immigration problem and work from there.

Being as objective as I can I would judge you to be far more anti america than I. I am anti stupid. The difference seems to confuse you.
 
Being as objective as I can I would judge you to be far more anti america than I. I am anti stupid. The difference seems to confuse you.
Objectivity utterly escapes you, my friend. It's a common malady found in hate-filled bigots, such as you.
 
But you need to look at this more broadly - politics are anecdotal as well. Just because the percentage of African Americans engaging in gun violence is higher than it is in other races doesn't mean you can apply it to all individuals within that demographic. A statistic is a statistic. And this one can't be used to characterize the entire racial group.


how hypocritical,,,,according to your sig. you have a problem with high wage earners, the wealthy, the rich, whatever you need to call them.
you're jealousy or those that have more than you is as ridiculous as what you try to say in your post about race.
only its not race with you, its rich....you're bigotry just takes a different form.

the gun violence and crimes attributed to blacks is epidemic considering they are but about 30% of the population....higher than any other racial group...
and to blame it on poverty or the neighborhood is just sticking your head in the sand....

If its the truth, it ain't racism- Poet
 
Words of a sniveling America hater.

The best thing to do is start with our illegal immigration problem and work from there.

You are in danger of making a grave error. You are NOT representative of America. Most Americans are OK. You are an obnoxious little tit.
 
But you need to look at this more broadly - politics are anecdotal as well. Just because the percentage of African Americans engaging in gun violence is higher than it is in other races doesn't mean you can apply it to all individuals within that demographic. A statistic is a statistic. And this one can't be used to characterize the entire racial group.

Could the argument be made that since the number of black males is proportionally smaller than the number of white males that the statistics are skewed?

It's racism to treat someone from one group differently? Does that mean every republican and democrat is a racist? I hate people that went to UCLA and Notre Dame. Racist?

Ya know, Wacko, I rarely "groan" you, but that was an exceptionally groanable post. For a second I thought USF or 007 were back, but the words were spelled correctly.

Objectivity utterly escapes you, my friend. It's a common malady found in hate-filled bigots, such as you.
 
Back
Top