WATERBOARD the Boston Marathon Bombing Culprits?

SJJRSJJS

Verified User
If anyone is taken into custody and we know that they are guilty/involved with the Boston Marathon bombing, then I am all for waterboarding them to squeeze all the info out of them, no pun intended. They did not play fair by bombing innocent people, so why should we play fair? In the past I have stated that in heinous crime situations where National Security is involved, waterboarding needs to be implemented. I would let them know that if they do not talk, then we would use extreme measures, aka Waterboarding. Also, if the are found lying to US, then they would be automatically Waterboarded just to be mean-spirited(LOL), we really need to wring the truth out of them, again no pun intended.
 
I never considered otherwise, although I do think drowning is probably one of the scariest things I've ever experienced. Knowing it was fake would probably be even worse.
 
I never considered otherwise, although I do think drowning is probably one of the scariest things I've ever experienced. Knowing it was fake would probably be even worse.
No one would die, but I would inform the "Bad Guys", that if they did not talk, and if they lied to US, then we would Waterboard them 24/7 until they told US absolutely everything. Naturally, we would have witnesses and medical people on Board, no pun intended to keep it "humane", as humane as the Marathon Bombers were.
 
Water boarding = good
Drone attacks = bad?

It all depends on Obama's position?
 
Waterboarding is illegal, dumbass.

However, if the killer is a militia member he most likely be in need of a good dousing (and delousing), so I'm inclined to agree.
 
Water boarding = good
Drone attacks = bad?

It all depends on Obama's position?

Or vice versa if you are a dem.

Water boarding is good because it works

Using drones kills which when applied to scumbag muslime terrorists I am not necessarily opposed to but you can't get intel out of a dead muslime
 
If anyone is taken into custody and we know that they are guilty/involved with the Boston Marathon bombing, then I am all for waterboarding them to squeeze all the info out of them, no pun intended.
If we know they're guilty, why interrogate them any further at all, let alone torture them?
They did not play fair by bombing innocent people, so why should we play fair?
Because that's the law.
In the past I have stated that in heinous crime situations where National Security is involved, waterboarding needs to be implemented.
So you'd be ok if it was YOU that someone was waterboarding?
I would let them know that if they do not talk, then we would use extreme measures, aka Waterboarding. Also, if the are found lying to US, then they would be automatically Waterboarded just to be mean-spirited(LOL)
Yeah, because we'd know if they were lying by knowing the truth in advance, which means all of the process would be mean spirited and ultimately serve no purpose other than to torture a human being. Of course, even if we didn't know the 'truth', extreme fear and duress are the best ways to get people to tell it, and we have a ton NO evidence to back up this claim.
we really need to wring the truth out of them, again no pun intended.
No, we don't.
 
If we know they're guilty, why interrogate them any further at all, let alone torture them?
Because that's the law.
So you'd be ok if it was YOU that someone was waterboarding?
Yeah, because we'd know if they were lying by knowing the truth in advance, which means all of the process would be mean spirited and ultimately serve no purpose other than to torture a human being. Of course, even if we didn't know the 'truth', extreme fear and duress are the best ways to get people to tell it, and we have a ton NO evidence to back up this claim.

No, we don't.

I don't know which of the two trolls this is in response to, but to be serious I wouldn't be able to waterboard either one of them.

Something about having to let go after sticking their head under water.
 
Interesting how when I express an opinion I'm a troll, but when you post pictures of two guys fucking or blatently racist material its merely comical.

About as two-faced as it comes.
 
If we know they're guilty, why interrogate them any further at all, let alone torture them?
Because that's the law.
So you'd be ok if it was YOU that someone was waterboarding?
Yeah, because we'd know if they were lying by knowing the truth in advance, which means all of the process would be mean spirited and ultimately serve no purpose other than to torture a human being. Of course, even if we didn't know the 'truth', extreme fear and duress are the best ways to get people to tell it, and we have a ton NO evidence to back up this claim.

No, we don't.
To get the truth out of them about others who may be involved. Waterboarding will not physically hurt anyone, but if there are other terrorists, we need to know about them Right now.
 
If anyone is taken into custody and we know that they are guilty/involved with the Boston Marathon bombing, then I am all for waterboarding them to squeeze all the info out of them, no pun intended. They did not play fair by bombing innocent people, so why should we play fair? In the past I have stated that in heinous crime situations where National Security is involved, waterboarding needs to be implemented. I would let them know that if they do not talk, then we would use extreme measures, aka Waterboarding. Also, if the are found lying to US, then they would be automatically Waterboarded just to be mean-spirited(LOL), we really need to wring the truth out of them, again no pun intended.
Only a coward would use torture. Only a pure yellow bellied gutless coward.

You may want to stoop to their level but I'm not scared of my own freaken shadow like you are so I find even thinking about using torturefor any reason as cowardly and immorall and not to be tolerated by civilized human beings.
 
Only a coward would use torture. Only a pure yellow bellied gutless coward.

You may want to stoop to their level but I'm not scared of my own freaken shadow like you are so I find even thinking about using torturefor any reason as cowardly and immorall and not to be tolerated by civilized human beings.
Butt, of course it is OK for your guy to use Drones on American Citizens, you Libs are touchy feely morons, who cannot run anything "Right", let alone this Country. By the way, one of your cohor boys, CNN's John King, just reported that they have a detailed image of a "dark skinned individual" depositing the second bomb package at the Boston Marathon, is that the shadow that you just referenced above. I want to arrest that MFer and Waterboard his culo as soon as possible, make him come to "terms", show the jackass no mercy. What the "F... is a Mott the Hoople, is it some kind of Lib identification with Georgi Soros, so that your Lib cohors know who you are, and kowtow to you?
 
Butt, of course it is OK for your guy to use Drones on American Citizens, you Libs are touchy feely morons, who cannot run anything "Right", let alone this Country. By the way, one of your cohor boys, CNN's John King, just reported that they have a detailed image of a "dark skinned individual" depositing the second bomb package at the Boston Marathon, is that the shadow that you just referenced above. I want to arrest that MFer and Waterboard his culo as soon as possible, make him come to "terms", show the jackass no mercy. What the "F... is a Mott the Hoople, is it some kind of Lib identification with Georgi Soros, so that your Lib cohors know who you are, and kowtow to you?

Who said thats okay?
 
Only a coward would use torture. Only a pure yellow bellied gutless coward.

You may want to stoop to their level but I'm not scared of my own freaken shadow like you are so I find even thinking about using torturefor any reason as cowardly and immorall and not to be tolerated by civilized human beings.

Mott I forgot to kowtow to you today.

Kowtow.
 
Send the person caught to Southie wearing a Yankees jersey. They'll give up the info real quick or won't be heard from again.
 
I think that if you're going to draw a line you have to stick to it. We didn't waterboard James Holmes(Though I'd have pulled the trigger myself if we'd executed him) we don't waterboard murderers, and for all the horror, terrorism is just murder. Find him, try him, execute him move on, but if we say we don't torture people then we don't torture them. If you break the rules for a good reason you'll break them for a bad one
 
Back
Top