I never though religion had anything to do with it. I always thought they were red states cause they're populated largely with rednecks.
Lol ... Of course, and of which I am the poster child.
I never though religion had anything to do with it. I always thought they were red states cause they're populated largely with rednecks.
Your ignorant nonsense is unsupported. As you are a welfare recipient, I am sure you think your anecdotal evidence is compelling, but I don't really put much value in it. Maybe you can provide a source?
From the article.
Yet, although the politics of the unaffiliated -- comparatively liberal on cultural questions and increasingly Democratic in voting preferences -- suggest that they are a fairly homogenous group...
Lol ... Of course, and of which I am the poster child.
You are the Duck Dynasty guy!?![]()
Your ignorant nonsense is unsupported. As you are a welfare recipient, I am sure you think your anecdotal evidence is compelling, but I don't really put much value in it. Maybe you can provide a source?
From the article.
Yet, although the politics of the unaffiliated -- comparatively liberal on cultural questions and increasingly Democratic in voting preferences -- suggest that they are a fairly homogenous group...
Very little. In fact on a percentage basis there is a higher percentage of rural people living in poverty than in metro areas.i was gonna say this. though I do wonder how much of that is due to liberal cities contained with the red states (i.e. new orleans etc)
But you just posted, "Anyone who thinks blue states get more welfare than red states obviously believes the multinational industrialist's propaganda spewed by Limbaugh and 'faux 'news'. ".......
And my post of the demographics covers INCOME, EDUCATION, and RELIGION.
You claim the poor and under-educated are religious....?
I've just proved the poor and under-educated are mostly Democrats.....ie, they are most likely also religious if your claim is accurate.
Your feelings don't trump the facts, that I simply repeated.
Actually, nevermind, since it really has nothing to do with the the op. Republicans attempt to appeal to the poor with religious dogma and a celebration of stupidity (see Bush, Palin and Santorum).
And let's be clear here, the one's spinning are you and Nova. This has nothing to do with Democrat versus Republican. But you have become defensive and feel the need to spin it into something about race. It's really more strange and alarming than it is comical.
Odd given that you made it about the parties...
Quite pathetic. You are spinning my response to Nova's attempt to spin.
lol... it doesn't say what you think it does. Wealth does not make a person 'smarter'. A higher education degree doesn't make one 'smart'. Bush, Kerry, Jarud, Toppy... all fine examples of that. You simply want to feel superior. It is based on your personal inferiority complex and your need to put down those who you think are beneath you. Which is why you try to lump them into categories as you do. It is pathetic.
No, I am quoting you directly. I am not spinning anything. But don't worry lil man... you are superior! ... yes you are! You be the smartest most wisest person ever.
I did not say that wealth makes a person smarter.
Your overly defensive response to the facts and attempts to lash out at me are the sign of an inferiority complex.
Yes, you quoted me... out of context, which is a common tactic for you. I did not bring up the Democrat versus Republican. Nova did, and I responded.
Can you comment of the topic of the op or is this going to be about your pathetic need for attention?
Science proves religious people are authoritarian, stupid and poor
LOL... I am not the one lashing out... you are in your attempt to paint religious people as
[h=1]Science proves religious people are authoritarian, stupid and poor[/h]
Did you forget the very link you began the thread with?
You wish to make yourself feel superior to them. We understand, you have an inferiority complex.
No, I am quoting you directly. I am not spinning anything. But don't worry lil man... you are superior! ... yes you are! You be the smartest most wisest person ever.
I continued the sentence into the post. Those are the facts detailed in the article, are they not?