Science proves religious people are authoritarian, stupid and poor

Rana said:
No need to get all emotional about this, you seem to take this so personal.
Click to expand...

lol... wrong as usual... I am agnostic. That said, I think it is blatantly elitist of people like String to post such nonsense. He does it for the sense of superiority. Trying to lump each group together as one is pathetic. Not one of his groups hit the 50% mark. Yet he is trying to pretend one whole is better than the other. That someone is 'stupid' because they don't believe as he does. Yeah, I am going to mock him for that.
 
Superfreak said:
lol... wrong as usual... I am agnostic. That said, I think it is blatantly elitist of people like String to post such nonsense. He does it for the sense of superiority. Trying to lump each group together as one is pathetic. Not one of his groups hit the 50% mark. Yet he is trying to pretend one whole is better than the other. That someone is 'stupid' because they don't believe as he does. Yeah, I am going to mock him for that.
Click to expand...


Dude, in, like, eleventy percent of your posts you pretend that you are better than others and that other people are stupid (morons, idiots) for not believing as you do. Suddenly, that's a bad thing to you?
 
Superfreak said:
lol... wrong as usual... I am agnostic. That said, I think it is blatantly elitist of people like String to post such nonsense. He does it for the sense of superiority. Trying to lump each group together as one is pathetic. Not one of his groups hit the 50% mark. Yet he is trying to pretend one whole is better than the other. That someone is 'stupid' because they don't believe as he does. Yeah, I am going to mock him for that.
Click to expand...

You have an overactive imagination.

I did not say that one is stupid because they believe in God. I reported that they are stupid (or rather uneducated) and poor in comparison to non believers.
 
Dungheap said:
Dude, in, like, eleventy percent of your posts you pretend that you are better than others and that other people are stupid (morons, idiots) for not believing as you do. Suddenly, that's a bad thing to you?
Click to expand...

There is a difference between thinking/acting that I am better than an individual that I have conversed with (in many cases for years) and condemning an entire group of people based on bigotry.

That said, Desh/Jarod are stupid... not because they believe differently, but because they are simply stupid. They lack the intellectual capacity to back their positions.

Others have said stupid things (myself included) to which I have called them out as morons/idiots for the specific comments they made at the time. You are not an idiot, but you say a lot of stupid things. For that I mock you.
 
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar said:
You have an overactive imagination.

I did not say that one is stupid because they believe in God. I reported that they are stupid (or rather uneducated) and poor in comparison to non believers.
Click to expand...

[h=2]Science proves religious people are authoritarian, stupid and poor[/h]
Again, even your 'non-believers' fail to achieve 50% success in those categories in the study. So on average it is quite stupid to try and proclaim superiority. There are plenty of stupid people that are atheists. There are plenty of rich people that are religious. Trying to lump them together as your OP article did is nothing short of a vain attempt to feel superior to a group of people you disagree with.
 
Superfreak said:
Science proves religious people are authoritarian, stupid and poor


Again, even your 'non-believers' fail to achieve 50% success in those categories in the study. So on average it is quite stupid to try and proclaim superiority. There are plenty of stupid people that are atheists. There are plenty of rich people that are religious. Trying to lump them together as your OP article did is nothing short of a vain attempt to feel superior to a group of people you disagree with.
Click to expand...

As I pointed out earlier I continued/completed that sentence with... "in comparison to the enlightened, well educated and wealthy atheists/agnostics." Why would you insist on dropping context when your dishonesty is so easily countered? 50% has what to do with it? Answer, nothing.

Further, I stated in response to Nova that I would guess most of the wealthy and educated are religious.

You are putting words in my mouth and arguing a strawman.
 
the fact that some liberal was stupid enough to raise this dead fish once again is proof that liberals are authoritarian, stupid and poor.....
 
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar said:
As I pointed out earlier I continued/completed that sentence with... "in comparison to the enlightened, well educated and wealthy atheists/agnostics." Why would you insist on dropping context when your dishonesty is so easily countered? 50% has what to do with it? Answer, nothing.

Further, I stated in response to Nova that I would guess most of the wealthy and educated are religious.

You are putting words in my mouth and arguing a strawman.
Click to expand...

He loves strawmen, he has a Dorthy costume. His ruby slippers are to die for. He doesn't have a dog, but he listens to ToTo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top