Why do they need marriage?

without question a man and woman have a fundamental civil right to marry regardless of race......however, it is impossible for a man to marry a man unless people pretend marriage means something it has never meant....

we already know that you have a very narrow concept of the definition of words... you didn't even know that sodomy included blow jobs. ;)
 
we already know that you have a very narrow concept of the definition of words... you didn't even know that sodomy included blow jobs. ;)

that is true....I was not as familiar with sodomy as you were.....I thought it meant only anal sex....meanwhile, marriage has not been that difficult to follow....it has only meant one thing for my entire life and a couple dozen generations before that...now, please crawl back in your fucking hole and don't respond to my posts again unless you desire to be treated uncivilly......
 
that is true....I was not as familiar with sodomy as you were.....I thought it meant only anal sex....meanwhile, marriage has not been that difficult to follow....it has only meant one thing for my entire life and a couple dozen generations before that...now, please crawl back in your fucking hole and don't respond to my posts again unless you desire to be treated uncivilly......

you can't be civil?

and the fact that you are unfamiliar with blowjobs is certainly not any failing of MINE. I just had one this afternoon while sitting on the side of my pool.

There are plenty of instances in human history where marriage has meant something other than one man and one woman...
 
you can't be civil?

with you?....fuck no....I've known you far longer than anyone here and I have seen what you have done to disrupt message boards.....take the current thread as an example.....there is no reason for you to choose to engage me in a conversation about sodomy or blow jobs....you think by doing so you will outrage and perhaps get me to say something bannable.....it is your style, you will engage in it with everyone here.......I choose not to treat you civilly.....so fuck yourself and go away....and fuck the tiny handful of ancient history in which marriage meant something other than a man and a woman....it is not true now and hasn't been since this country existed......
 
with you?....fuck no....I've known you far longer than anyone here and I have seen what you have done to disrupt message boards.....take the current thread as an example.....there is no reason for you to choose to engage me in a conversation about sodomy or blow jobs....you think by doing so you will outrage and perhaps get me to say something bannable.....it is your style, you will engage in it with everyone here.......I choose not to treat you civilly.....so fuck yourself and go away....and fuck the tiny handful of ancient history in which marriage meant something other than a man and a woman....it is not true now and hasn't been since this country existed......

so, you honestly think that you can tell me to go away and I'll dutifully obey?

marriage in THIS country has meant a man and multiple women... but I suppose that doesn't matter to you, eh?

and there are NUMEROUS people on here who have known me far longer than you, trust me. Or ask them.
 
fuck you and go away.....that is the only response I will be giving any time you ask me a question from here on out....debate with someone else....
 
how prophetic. you've been a nutless little prick for as long as I've known you and it apparently continues. good on ya.
 
without question a man and woman have a fundamental civil right to marry regardless of race......however, it is impossible for a man to marry a man unless people pretend marriage means something it has never meant....

The essence of marriage is the romantic commitment and the sharing of ones life, resources and responsibilities with another. The gender of the participants does not change that meaning and has nothing to do with why it is a fundamental civil right.

human language places limits on marriage....

Nope. Marriage means what we say it means. For instance, if I say you represent a perfect marriage of brawn and brains, no one would say I was talking about a union between a man and woman. They would say I was crazy. In essence, marriage means a close union.

Your argument is nothing but another in the long list of bullshit evasions. They are going to come out with a new dictionary every year and it's no big deal if we add another edit. It's not the least bit important to the debate and I seriously doubt you or any sane person sincerely cares about that.
 
Last edited:
These "marriage preservation" clowns never cease to amaze me.

"OMG if a man marries another MAN, next thing you know the government will make us ALL get GAY MARRIED!!!"

"Marriage is SACRED! Just ask my 5th wife!"

"Allowing gay marriage is a slippery slope!!1! Soon, people will marry CAMELS!!, 3 TOED SLOTHS"

It always struck me as ironic how these same opponents to equal marriage rights considered themselves "small government" types. I'm ashamed that they would hijack the principles of smaller government in an effort to use government as a weapon. Government shouldn't be in the marriage business at all in my opinion, but if they are, there is no right to exclude anyone who wishes to engage in the institution.

SMALL GOVERNMENT! THE MORE RIGHTS WE EXCLUDE THE BETTER BECAUSE THOUGHT ISN'T IMPORTANT! JUST TEAMS!!

Idiots.
 
Back
Top