Another Day-Another child falls thanks to gun nuts selfish refusal to compromise.

If he's the spokesperson for liberal talking points, that makes you the Jerry's Kid poster child of teabagger nonsense.

Do you have anything to support this feel good statement of yours, is this yet another example of you trying to make your opinion appear to be fact? :)
 
Do you have anything to support this feel good statement of yours, is this yet another example of you trying to make your opinion appear to be fact? :)

Anymore than your opinion of the other poster? No....why? Do I need facts for that? Innuendo and conjecture is all that you seem to need.
 
Anymore than your opinion of the other poster? No....why? Do I need facts for that? Innuendo and conjecture is all that you seem to need.

Do you have such a low opinion of this "other poster" that you don't FEEL they can defend their own behavior and therefore you have to try and divert attention away from you and towards them?

I also find it highly hypocritical that liberals, who generally try to promote themselves as the defender of the weak, will take the first opportunity to use those same examples as a method to try and denigrate someone who they can't best in any other way. :palm:
 
Do you have such a low opinion of this "other poster" that you don't FEEL they can defend their own behavior and therefore you have to try and divert attention away from you and towards them?

I also find it highly hypocritical that liberals, who generally try to promote themselves as the defender of the weak, will take the first opportunity to use those same examples as a method to try and denigrate someone who they can't best in any other way. :palm:

Never knew you were a liberal....that's your game ( denigrating others when beaten)

Of course, that makes sense....straight out of "rules for radicals"....accuse others of what you yourself are doing....OK, Mr. Alinsky...the jig's up.
 
Never knew you were a liberal....that's your game ( denigrating others when beaten)

Of course, that makes sense....straight out of "rules for radicals"....accuse others of what you yourself are doing....OK, Mr. Alinsky...the jig's up.

Untrue; because my responses have been in a direct coorelation to what the liberals have presented.

As Poet used to say: Don't bring none, won't be none. :)
 
Yeah....I disagree with that too. When I think of gun nuts, I think of people who are so paranoid that they feel that home invasions are such an issue that they feel they need to keel a loaded pistol at the ready at all times, people who feel so scared that they feel the need to carry in public, and those that feel that any ideas are a precursors to rounding up weapons in some kind of Communist Conspiracy.
you know what I find funny? all the idiots that think gun nuts are paranoid fraidy cats for carrying in public getting mugged, raped, and murdered by someone because they felt that the odds were so small of that happening that they don't need to carry a gun. I find that fucking hilarious.
 
you know what I find funny? all the idiots that think gun nuts are paranoid fraidy cats for carrying in public getting mugged, raped, and murdered by someone because they felt that the odds were so small of that happening that they don't need to carry a gun. I find that fucking hilarious.

How many would that be? Face it...you're pussies.
 
this is the catateral damage the right is willing to bare for their poltical gain.

Dead babies just dont bother then that much
 
Another Day-Another child falls thanks to gun nuts selfish refusal to compromis

this is the catateral damage the right is willing to bare for their poltical gain.

Dead babies just dont bother then that much

Show me the evidence that these precious expanded background checks would have prevented this tragedy. Sorry puddin but we are on to your Alinsky tactics. Back your shit up or scuttle off to the children's table
 
this is the catateral damage the right is willing to bare for their poltical gain.

Dead babies just dont bother then that much
this is not about political gain, this is about the costs associated with a fundamental right. A cost that the framers felt was acceptable in order to maintain freedom.
 
this is not about political gain, this is about the costs associated with a fundamental right. A cost that the framers felt was acceptable in order to maintain freedom.
the framers put the words "well regulated" in there too... Seems like you gun nuts have zero problem ignoring THAT part of the amendment. Hmmmmmm.
 
the framers put the words "well regulated" in there too... Seems like you gun nuts have zero problem ignoring THAT part of the amendment. Hmmmmmm.
not at all. I am well regulated. I know firearms. how to maintain. how to shoot. how to 'drill' or work with others in small units. I am well regulated. are you?
 
not at all. I am well regulated. I know firearms. how to maintain. how to shoot. how to 'drill' or work with others in small units. I am well regulated. are you?

knowing HOW to be well regulated is not the same as actually BEING well regulated. WHO regulates you, besides that mouse that lives in your pocket?
 
Another Day-Another child falls thanks to gun nuts selfish refusal to compromis

the framers put the words "well regulated" in there too... Seems like you gun nuts have zero problem ignoring THAT part of the amendment. Hmmmmmm.

As has been stated it does not mean what you think it does.
 
Back
Top