Benghazi - The Nightmare Is Over!

I'm not angry and I'm not compulsive about anything.

Listen pal... I worked long and hard in my life and never took a dime from Uncle Sam except my Navy paycheck... now I'm retired and I made a lot of money along the way.... now I hang out, swim in the pool, go to the beach, go to the symphony and every day my MONEY makes more money that you do... I just thought that, if you were so sure about your prediction, you'd jump at the chance for some extra dough. Clearly, you really aren't as sure about that impeachment thing as you led us to believe. I understand.
 
another day, and PiMP is following me around again like a puppy. cute, but weird. maybe you could go follow someone else, homoboy?
 
maineman said:
I'm not angry and I'm not compulsive about anything.

Listen pal... I worked long and hard in my life and never took a dime from Uncle Sam except my Navy paycheck... now I'm retired and I made a lot of money along the way.... now I hang out, swim in the pool, go to the beach, go to the symphony and every day my MONEY makes more money that you do... I just thought that, if you were so sure about your prediction, you'd jump at the chance for some extra dough. Clearly, you really aren't as sure about that impeachment thing as you led us to believe. I understand.
Click to expand...
Firstly, again, I dont need your money, I don't gamble on principle.
I know how gamblers suffer from their addiction, and the abuse they pile on their families.

Boastin about your income?

Internet rich kid!!!!!

Tell me how you kicked chuck Norris ass in the real world !!

Then you can be an Internet tough guy too!!

Two points, you are a pussy, living in relative poverty, posting pipe dreams on an Internet forum.

Another word for you would be LOSER!!
 
maineman said:
I ain't afraid a no fags... PiMP is just being sort of weird with his stalking behavior, doncha think?
Click to expand...

Don't care about your mancrush on him. Just your rampant homophobia which will get you shunned by the thought police. But, maybe like all good libs you will be given a pass
 
007 said:
Firstly, again, I dont need your money, I don't gamble on principle.
I know how gamblers suffer from their addiction, and the abuse they pile on their families.

Boastin about your income?

Internet rich kid!!!!!

Tell me how you kicked chuck Norris ass in the real world !!

Then you can be an Internet tough guy too!!

Two points, you are a pussy, living in relative poverty, posting pipe dreams on an Internet forum.

Another word for you would be LOSER!!
Click to expand...

not boasting about anything...merely stating facts and saying that I can certainly cover the bet if Obama gets impeached. the POINT being that you spew all these ridiculous opinions as if they are foregone conclusions, and they really aren't. I realize that you righties would LOVE to see Obama impeached, but trust me, that will NEVER happen. THe ass kicking the GOP got the last time they impeached a president has taught the smart ones in that party never to try that shit again.

and, in your world, if this life of mine is your definition of "losing", I don't want to be a winner.
 
evince said:
what is the big crime the right claims took place here?


is it editing talking points to avoid bad press?

IS that the Big claimed crime?


how come none of you were mad when the Bush admin lied about the death of Pat Tiller?



How about the lies promoted about Jessica Lynch?


you saw no crime back then
Click to expand...

I pointed out the frauds around Pat Tillman, Jessica Lynch, the toppling of Saddam's statue, and many others committed by the Bush Administration. I saw the crime in the deceptions of war .. as many did democrats as well .. at the time.

The difference is that now that Bush is no longer in office, democrats make the same excuses for Obama's deceptions of war that republicans did when Bush was in office.

There is absolutely no difference between the two.

In case you're interested, the crime was in keeping the truth that the Libyan people did not want their country invaded or Gaddafi removed from the American people. The attack on Libya was the exact same foreign policy that led us into Iraq .. complete with the same kind of deceptions ..

.. that democrats no longer care about.
 
I Love America said:
Don't care about your mancrush on him. Just your rampant homophobia which will get you shunned by the thought police. But, maybe like all good libs you will be given a pass
Click to expand...
like I said... gays don't scare me in the least bit. Nearly all of them are well aware of the fact that straight guys like me don't go in for what they go in for... I guess PiMP just must be the exception. I certainly don't have a mancrush on HIM... he has followed ME around for two days now reading every post I write and groaning it. I can only guess his motivation for such behavior.
 
Thing1 said:
They voted to give Bush the authority to use force, if necessary.

Bush made the decision to go to war, unnecessarily. It's his war. He's the warmonger.

I realize you'll never accept this, but it hardly matters. It is the history of it.
Click to expand...


Well thingy, it wasn't called the Iraq WAR resolution for nothing now, was it......your acute state of denial is astounding to witness,
how you play on words, your obcession with one in particular, how you ignore the previous 10 years,,,,,,,,,,,, its like doing an internship on mental illness for the rest of us.
I didn't really think much about BDS until this last couple of days with you and maineman and how serious it warps your reality. The lengths you guys
will go to over a word or what you think is a missing word, is mind blowing....

To sum it up,....you, obsessed with the word invasion. Bombing, missile and air strikes doesn't compute as war to you, but invasion, wow, now thats war, right ?.
A ten year record of warnings, that "one way or another"-(Clinton) and various other threats of military force (war) would be forthcoming if Saddam didn't conform, is
completely ignored by you because of a missing word, invasion, like that word has some magical power over you....the fact that we were already killing Iraqis for
years with our military and were responsible for another million using sanctions means nothing to you...and you have to balls to use the phrase 'UN-necessary war",
like there was nothing going on, thats serious denial...if we'd have nuked Saddam, you wouldn't call it war as long as we didn't "invade".....thats mental illness.
And that is valid analogy....

Then we have mm....a Republican says exactly what Democrats have been says for the last 10 years....that he is now convinced, hes positive they are right.....hes sure, and
speaking for himself as one normally does, he says, 'there is no doubt' and all hell breaks loose in the mind of a BDS sufferer....he lied, he lied, there is doubt, I have
doubt, my wife has doubt, there are some Democrats in congress that have doubt....so hes lying....
Somewhere in this BDS affected mind, the person, thinks this one man is not speaking for himself, but for everyone in the world and must know that everyone in the world agrees with him.....if someone somewhere has doubt, then hes lying...
or
in this BDS affected mind, the person, thinks this one man is not speaking for himself, but for everyone and he knows a guy that has doubt, so that statement is a lie...he
can't say 'there is no doubt' if he knows another person that has doubt....

The convoluted reasoning and gymnastics of logic is a wonder to behold...I'm glad the thread is here for all to read.
 
maineman said:
not boasting about anything...merely stating facts and saying that I can certainly cover the bet if Obama gets impeached. the POINT being that you spew all these ridiculous opinions as if they are foregone conclusions, and they really aren't. I realize that you righties would LOVE to see Obama impeached, but trust me, that will NEVER happen. THe ass kicking the GOP got the last time they impeached a president has taught the smart ones in that party never to try that shit again.

and, in your world, if this life of mine is your definition of "losing", I don't want to be a winner.
Click to expand...

No proof?
You are lying.
You live in a shack, are missing half your teeth and live on welfare.

Fucking loser!
 
NOVA said:
Well thingy, it wasn't called the Iraq WAR resolution for nothing now, was it......your acute state of denial is astounding to witness,
how you play on words, your obcession with one in particular, how you ignore the previous 10 years,,,,,,,,,,,, its like doing an internship on mental illness for the rest of us.
I didn't really think much about BDS until this last couple of days with you and maineman and how serious it warps your reality. The lengths you guys
will go to over a word or what you think is a missing word, is mind blowing....

To sum it up,....you, obsessed with the word invasion. Bombing, missile and air strikes doesn't compute as war to you, but invasion, wow, now thats war, right ?.
A ten year record of warnings, that "one way or another"-(Clinton) and various other threats of military force (war) would be forthcoming if Saddam didn't conform, is
completely ignored by you because of a missing word, invasion, like that word has some magical power over you....the fact that we were already killing Iraqis for
years with our military and were responsible for another million using sanctions means nothing to you...and you have to balls to use the phrase 'UN-necessary war",
like there was nothing going on, thats serious denial...if we'd have nuked Saddam, you wouldn't call it war as long as we didn't "invade".....thats mental illness.
And that is valid analogy....

Then we have mm....a Republican says exactly what Democrats have been says for the last 10 years....that he is now convinced, hes positive they are right.....hes sure, and
speaking for himself as one normally does, he says, 'there is no doubt' and all hell breaks loose in the mind of a BDS sufferer....he lied, he lied, there is doubt, I have
doubt, my wife has doubt, there are some Democrats in congress that have doubt....so hes lying....
Somewhere in this BDS affected mind, the person, thinks this one man is not speaking for himself, but for everyone in the world and must know that everyone in the world agrees with him.....if someone somewhere has doubt, then hes lying...
or
in this BDS affected mind, the person, thinks this one man is not speaking for himself, but for everyone and he knows a guy that has doubt, so that statement is a lie...he
can't say 'there is no doubt' if he knows another person that has doubt....

The convoluted reasoning and gymnastics of logic is a wonder to behold...I'm glad the thread is here for all to read.
Click to expand...

Them's a lot of words for a turnip.

Too bad it wasn't called the "war resolution." And yeah - I guess I do bring up "invasion" a lot...because that is what BUSH decided to do.

You should extract yourself from the koolaid once in awhile. Like I always say, it doesn't matter what Bush's #1 apologist says - it will always be his war. His decision, his war.
 
NOVA said:
Well thingy, it wasn't called the Iraq WAR resolution for nothing now, was it......your acute state of denial is astounding to witness,
how you play on words, your obcession with one in particular, how you ignore the previous 10 years,,,,,,,,,,,, its like doing an internship on mental illness for the rest of us.
I didn't really think much about BDS until this last couple of days with you and maineman and how serious it warps your reality. The lengths you guys
will go to over a word or what you think is a missing word, is mind blowing....

To sum it up,....you, obsessed with the word invasion. Bombing, missile and air strikes doesn't compute as war to you, but invasion, wow, now thats war, right ?.
A ten year record of warnings, that "one way or another"-(Clinton) and various other threats of military force (war) would be forthcoming if Saddam didn't conform, is
completely ignored by you because of a missing word, invasion, like that word has some magical power over you....the fact that we were already killing Iraqis for
years with our military and were responsible for another million using sanctions means nothing to you...and you have to balls to use the phrase 'UN-necessary war",
like there was nothing going on, thats serious denial...if we'd have nuked Saddam, you wouldn't call it war as long as we didn't "invade".....thats mental illness.
And that is valid analogy....

Then we have mm....a Republican says exactly what Democrats have been says for the last 10 years....that he is now convinced, hes positive they are right.....hes sure, and
speaking for himself as one normally does, he says, 'there is no doubt' and all hell breaks loose in the mind of a BDS sufferer....he lied, he lied, there is doubt, I have
doubt, my wife has doubt, there are some Democrats in congress that have doubt....so hes lying....
Somewhere in this BDS affected mind, the person, thinks this one man is not speaking for himself, but for everyone in the world and must know that everyone in the world agrees with him.....if someone somewhere has doubt, then hes lying...
or
in this BDS affected mind, the person, thinks this one man is not speaking for himself, but for everyone and he knows a guy that has doubt, so that statement is a lie...he
can't say 'there is no doubt' if he knows another person that has doubt....

The convoluted reasoning and gymnastics of logic is a wonder to behold...I'm glad the thread is here for all to read.
Click to expand...

What the fuck are you talking about? it wasn't called the Iraq WAR resolution. Did Rush tell you that?

and again... you want to say that words have meanings, except those times when you want them to mean something different. THERE IS NO DOUBT is, and has always been a group of words preceding a statement of fact. I HAVE NO DOUBT is, and has always been, a group of words preceding the statement of an opinion.

And no democratic office holder EVER expressed absolute certainty about Saddam's stockpiles of WMD's.

and the doubt was not me or democrats, the doubts came from within his own administration, his own intelligence organizations. To claim no doubt when doubt certainly existed -even among his own team - that's just a lie, and you know it.
 
007 said:
No proof?
You are lying.
You live in a shack, are missing half your teeth and live on welfare.

Fucking loser!
Click to expand...

if that helps you make it through the night, you keep thinking that... I've gotta go get ready for the symphony concert. see ya... wouldn't wanna be ya. lol
 
maineman said:
cuz being truthful and saying, "We THINK Saddam has WMD's and we actually THINK we MIGHT know where they MIGHT BE!" just doesn't get the old blood pumping like absolute certainty does, does it?
Click to expand...

No it does not.

Especially when your target audience are mouth breathing clowns who need to be spoonfed their information in order to generate the proper level of anger.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
No it does not.

Especially when your target audience are mouth breathing clowns who need to be spoonfed their information in order to generate the proper level of anger.
Click to expand...

Another one of your lies cuntface?
Of course it is, it's one of your posts!!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
No it does not.

Especially when your target audience are mouth breathing clowns who need to be spoonfed their information in order to generate the proper level of anger.
Click to expand...

You mean like 'Gaddafi is passing out Viagra to his troops so they can rape the hell out of Libyan women' .. and then have two powerful women deliver that message .. which one of them just pulled out of her ass?

The only difference is the letter behind the name.

Same policy.
 
patriot66 said:
Naturally he left out the entire post where I said no thanks queer boy, and I certainly wasn't asking for one you intellectually dishonest, treasonous, liberal piece of garbage.
Click to expand...

Oh but you were being another smug, RightWing douchebag and taunting Howey.

I guess it's okay for you to be a homophobic jackass and belittle a guy for his sexual orientation, but others aren't allowed the same leeway you get to enjoy.
 
007 said:
But Obama lied about his failure to perform his duty as c in c and his oath as such to provide reasonable protection.

Stop changing the subject, Obama is a criminal, he will be impeached for his criminal negligence over Benghazi.
Click to expand...


Do promise to not try and get too down in the dumps when that particular prediction never takes place, okay?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top