It's going to "plunge" to double what Bush's Deficits were? Wow, impressive and stuff. <- sarcasm...
Last I checked, $642 billion is slightly less than $2.4 trillion.
You didn't really think they'd EVER be able to say anything positive about obama and his handling of the economy, did you/
Did you also happen to notice California reported they will be sporting a 4.5 BILLION DOLLAR SURPLUS?
So much for the non-stop claims that California is going bankrupt.
Could one argue it was the House that forced the President to reduce the spending and brought down the deficit or must all praise go to the President?
Where did you read California is going to have a $4.5 billion surplus?
Could one argue it was the House that forced the President to reduce the spending and brought down the deficit or must all praise go to the President?
Where did you read California is going to have a $4.5 billion surplus?
It's going to "plunge" to double what Bush's Deficits were? Wow, impressive and stuff. <- sarcasm...
Last I checked, $642 billion is slightly less than $2.4 trillion.
What year did bush have a $2.4 trillion deficit???
He didn't. He had half of that. Damo said it plunged to double Bush's deficit. 2.4 T is double Bush's deficit.
And I'm basing the 1.2 figure on January 2009 CBO estimates.
Link
Last I checked, $642 billion is slightly less than $2.4 trillion.
He didn't. He had half of that. Damo said it plunged to double Bush's deficit. 2.4 T is double Bush's deficit.
And I'm basing the 1.2 figure on January 2009 CBO estimates.
You didn't really think they'd EVER be able to say anything positive about obama and his handling of the economy, did you/
Did you also happen to notice California reported they will be sporting a 4.5 BILLION DOLLAR SURPLUS?
So much for the non-stop claims that California is going bankrupt.