Immoral Republican Threatens Mother

Timshel

New member
I wonder if Sarah Palin thinks this as unfricking believable as the irrelevant MSNBC promo.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/...esbian-couple-to-live-apart-or-lose-children/

A Republican Texas Judge has ordered a lesbian couple to live apart or give up custody of their children. According to Think Progress, Judge John Roach of McKinney, Texas has given Page Price 30 days to move out of the home she shares with Carolyn Compton and Compton’s two children from a previous marriage because he does not approve of Compton and Price’s “lifestyle.”


Roach has placed a “morality clause” in Compton’s divorce papers, which forbids Compton from having anyone she is not related to “by blood or marriage” in her home past 9:00 p.m. if the children are present. Same sex marriage is illegal in Texas, so by law, Compton cannot live with Price if she wishes to retain custody of her children.


Compton said that she and Price have been together for three years. Compton’s ex-husband rarely bothers to see the children and was previously arrested on charges of third-degree felony stalking in 2011, charges that he was able to plea down to criminal trespassing, a misdemeanor.




In a post on Facebook, Price wrote that Roach had inserted the morality clause into the divorce agreement when Compton’s ex-husband Joshua Compton attempted to gain custody of the children in 2011. The judge wrote that he disapproved of the two women’s “lifestyle.”


“Our children are all happy and well adjusted. By his enforcement, being that we cannot marry in this state, I have been ordered to move out of my home,” Price wrote.


The two women are working with attorneys to figure out what steps they can take to fight the state’s notoriously conservative court system.


Ken Upton Jr., senior staff attorney for Lambda Legal’s Dallas office, told the Dallas Voice newspaper that morality clauses are a holdover from a time when judges tried to keep people with children from living together outside of marriage. Courts often insert the clauses without telling the people involved, particularly in backward, conservative areas like Collin County, Texas.


“What the clause has become is an extra burden on gay people because they’re no more likely to violate it than straight people,” Upton told the Voice. “It’s a problem that continues with homophobia.”http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/...esbian-couple-to-live-apart-or-lose-children/
 
There is Conservative right wing social politics for you. A large minority of republicans agree with this decision.
 
or they can wait a few years and even Texas will be way more left leaning.

demographics are going to change everything
 
Based on the OP the judge had the right to make that ruling. I suppose the only grey area is whether or not the lesbian couple are actually living together. It seems she conceded that.

Q for further discussion. Should the harm visited on children due to a societal prejudice matter? In family law, children are paramount, if that is the case, and if indeed a societal prejudice visits harm on the children... You get it, right?
 
Are there other possible factors in the decision? Drugs? Alcohol? Domestic disturbances?

If not, then it's bullshit.,
 
Based on the OP the judge had the right to make that ruling. I suppose the only grey area is whether or not the lesbian couple are actually living together. It seems she conceded that.

Q for further discussion. Should the harm visited on children due to a societal prejudice matter? In family law, children are paramount, if that is the case, and if indeed a societal prejudice visits harm on the children... You get it, right?

Wrong. Judges are frequently removed from the bench for imposing their personal political agendas upon others:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/divorce_judge_dumped_4n94mV3OJQMzFc0qi873PO

New Jersey Judge Paul Escandon will no longer hear divorce cases as of Jan. 2 after a months-long campaign by women who claim he systematically cheated them from the bench, a court source revealed.

“He has no business wearing a robe,” said Rachel Alintoff, who lost custody of her 2-year old, Hayden, in Escandon’s Monmouth County courtroom last year.

“I don’t think there’s any section of the judicial system where he won’t do damage.”

An Appellate Court reversed Escandon’s ruling, returning Hayden to his mom.

Escandon’s transfer comes six months after The Post first reported how he also awarded custody of three kids to a reputed mobster.

There's many more instances, particularly with divorce court judges.
 
Based on the OP the judge had the right to make that ruling. I suppose the only grey area is whether or not the lesbian couple are actually living together. It seems she conceded that.

Q for further discussion. Should the harm visited on children due to a societal prejudice matter? In family law, children are paramount, if that is the case, and if indeed a societal prejudice visits harm on the children... You get it, right?

He does not have the right. He has the power to do it.

No, I am not sure I get what you are saying? It seem you might be saying that, for instance, kids born to parents of a minority religious sect should be seized by the state to avoid prejudice. But I don't want to put words in your mouth? Or maybe you are just suggesting it for consideration? I have a suggestion for you, but you might think it impolite.
 
I wonder if Sarah Palin thinks this as unfricking believable as the irrelevant MSNBC promo.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/...esbian-couple-to-live-apart-or-lose-children/

A Republican Texas Judge has ordered a lesbian couple to live apart or give up custody of their children. According to Think Progress, Judge John Roach of McKinney, Texas has given Page Price 30 days to move out of the home she shares with Carolyn Compton and Compton’s two children from a previous marriage because he does not approve of Compton and Price’s “lifestyle.”


Roach has placed a “morality clause” in Compton’s divorce papers, which forbids Compton from having anyone she is not related to “by blood or marriage” in her home past 9:00 p.m. if the children are present. Same sex marriage is illegal in Texas, so by law, Compton cannot live with Price if she wishes to retain custody of her children.


Compton said that she and Price have been together for three years. Compton’s ex-husband rarely bothers to see the children and was previously arrested on charges of third-degree felony stalking in 2011, charges that he was able to plea down to criminal trespassing, a misdemeanor.




In a post on Facebook, Price wrote that Roach had inserted the morality clause into the divorce agreement when Compton’s ex-husband Joshua Compton attempted to gain custody of the children in 2011. The judge wrote that he disapproved of the two women’s “lifestyle.”


“Our children are all happy and well adjusted. By his enforcement, being that we cannot marry in this state, I have been ordered to move out of my home,” Price wrote.


The two women are working with attorneys to figure out what steps they can take to fight the state’s notoriously conservative court system.


Ken Upton Jr., senior staff attorney for Lambda Legal’s Dallas office, told the Dallas Voice newspaper that morality clauses are a holdover from a time when judges tried to keep people with children from living together outside of marriage. Courts often insert the clauses without telling the people involved, particularly in backward, conservative areas like Collin County, Texas.


“What the clause has become is an extra burden on gay people because they’re no more likely to violate it than straight people,” Upton told the Voice. “It’s a problem that continues with homophobia.”

another example of an abusive legal system

if the people in the relationship are happy and the children are happy, then what is the problem? just a disgruntled ex and a barbaric legal system

i have posted another abuse (on app) by an insurance company/developer that wanted to buy a property that was not for sale and won by having more money for legal fees than the not for profit owners of the property
 
another example of an abusive legal system

if the people in the relationship are happy and the children are happy, then what is the problem? just a disgruntled ex and a barbaric legal system

i have posted another abuse (on app) by an insurance company/developer that wanted to buy a property that was not for sale and won by having more money for legal fees than the not for profit owners of the property

I don't know that the ex had anything to do with it. The judge just seems to be a prick.
 
Back
Top