The American people know what's up!

Poor Cons, they went wacko over three nothing stories about the president, the people were able to see stright to the facts!
 
Not surprised a bit, especially when you have the media in your pocket. Then add the typical low informed Obama voter that has no clue about anything.
 
RazorX said:
Not surprised a bit, especially when you have the media in your pocket. Then add the typical low informed Obama voter that has no clue about anything.
Click to expand...
i thought the media is mad at him over the wire tapping?
 
Can't speak for republicans .. but sudden changes in poll numbers is not the effect I'm looking for or expect to happen at this point in the revelations.

That being said, the American people have indeed spoken.

Same poll ..

59% now say that the U.S government could have prevented the attack in Benghazi, up 11 points from last November.

Only 42% of the public is satisfied with how the Obama administration has handled the September attack in Benghazi, Libya, which left the U.S ambassador to that country and three other Americans dead. Fifty-three percent say they are dissatisfied.

And only 37% say that congressional Republicans are overreacting in their handling of the matter, with 59% saying they've reacted appropriately.

It's the same story on the IRS controversy, with 54% saying the GOP in Congress has not overplayed its hand.

It would appear that this poll is indeed a mixed bag for democrats. I wouldn't crow about it too loudly.

All the screaming about "racist witch hunts" aren't supported by the American people.

The real poll will be taken in the 2014 midterms.
 
Last edited:
blackascoal said:
Can't speak for republicans .. but sudden changes in poll numbers is not the effect I'm looking for or expect to happen at this point in the revelations.

That being said, the American people have indeed spoken.

Same poll ..

59% now say that the U.S government could have prevented the attack in Benghazi, up 11 points from last November.

Only 42% of the public is satisfied with how the Obama administration has handled the September attack in Benghazi, Libya, which left the U.S ambassador to that country and three other Americans dead. Fifty-three percent say they are dissatisfied.

And only 37% say that congressional Republicans are overreacting in their handling of the matter, with 59% saying they've reacted appropriately.

It's the same story on the IRS controversy, with 54% saying the GOP in Congress has not overplayed its hand.

It would appear that this poll is indeed a mixed bag for democrats. I wouldn't crow about it too loudly.

All the screaming about "racist witch hunts" aren't supported by the American people.

The real poll will be taken in the 2014 midterms.
Click to expand...

I have to agree with the American people on everything you bolded... Except that some Congressional Republicans have overplayed their hand.

I am all for investigations and finding out how we could have done better in Benghazi. I am all for a full investigation onto the IRS mess, What I am against is the attacks on the President based on false information, gratuitous assumptions, and flat out lies.
 
Jarod said:
I have to agree with the American people on everything you bolded... Except that some Congressional Republicans have overplayed their hand.

I am all for investigations and finding out how we could have done better in Benghazi. I am all for a full investigation onto the IRS mess, What I am against is the attacks on the President based on false information, gratuitous assumptions, and flat out lies.
Click to expand...

I agree with everything you said brother .. except the bolded .. none of which can be determined without serious investigations.

What his supporters call 'lies' and 'false information' are often found to be the absolute truth.

These are serious issues that require serious investigation.
 
blackascoal said:
I agree with everything you said brother .. except the bolded .. none of which can be determined without serious investigations.

What his supporters call 'lies' and 'false information' are often found to be the absolute truth.

These are serious issues that require serious investigation.
Click to expand...

I am all for serious investigation, but I am against the attacks until there are some facts to attack with. I am against saying the President lied, when you don't have a quote in which you claim he lied.
 
Jarod said:
1) Rasmussen is a joke, that was proven last November...
2) How long has it been 49/49 was there any movement over the past three weeks while the Republicans were pretending to be outraged by a false scandals?
Click to expand...

You're asking questions that make me wonder if you even read the info at the link.
Did you read the info or are is this just your latest "rant-du-jour"?
 
Jarod said:
I am all for serious investigation, but I am against the attacks until there are some facts to attack with. I am against saying the President lied, when you don't have a quote in which you claim he lied.
Click to expand...

And yet you support the premise that Bush LIED about Iraq.
You sit very nicely, on your hypocritical horse.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
And yet you support the premise that Bush LIED about Iraq.
You sit very nicely, on your hypocritical horse.
Click to expand...


I have quotes where Bush says, "We know for certain Iraq has WMD."

If you have a quote where President Obama says, "We know for certain it was not terrorists who attacked us in Benghazi.", I would agree with you.


Can you not see the difference?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top