palm beach police pump 115 rounds in to person who never shot at them

SmarterthanYou said:
AND worse. the individual had just had his life threatened by a steroid hyped murderer holding a gun to his head, but because he wears a badge, he'll suffer no consequences.
Click to expand...

Trust me he suffered consequences, not as much as he should have, but some.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you just like to trip around the words and belittle anyone that carries a gun who isn't a cop with sexual innuendos and insults. not even close to the same thing. \sarcasm
Click to expand...


And I get belittled with sexual innuendos and insults every time I mention I think there should be some form of license required to own a gun.

I've got supposedly "honest" posters constantly misrepresenting what I say, parsing words and attributing actions and beliefs to me that are completely untrue.

The fact remains you can't honestly discuss what I say, so you and the others just make up whatever bullshit you like and claim it's how I feel.
 
I have no idea who Desh is, but if we were related I believe posting that would be against the rules, right? no personal info on the forums? Maybe I'm related, maybe I'm not. Really can't say.

"badge bunny"?

didn't I just say that the cops would not even be facing an inquiry if he had shot back? Sadly, he's dead. It seems to be due to police stupidity or brutality (we can't say for sure till all facts are in - but 115 bullets? seriously?) I only brought up how gun rights people might say if he had just had enough guns, he would have outshot the police, and the real trouble is he didn't have enough guns because of Zappa's comment re how he's never said only police should have guns.

I realize it's a tangent but hey - that happens.

At any rate - if he had fired back, cops would have been off scot-free. I certainly hope now this gets thoroughly investigated.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
And I get belittled with sexual innuendos and insults every time I mention I think there should be some form of license required to own a gun.
Click to expand...
don't dish it out if you can't take it. now, WHY should there be a license to own a gun, but not a license to vote?

ZappasGuitar said:
I've got supposedly "honest" posters constantly misrepresenting what I say, parsing words and attributing actions and beliefs to me that are completely untrue.

The fact remains you can't honestly discuss what I say, so you and the others just make up whatever bullshit you like and claim it's how I feel.
Click to expand...
don't blame others for your bullshit claims or inability to express yourself clearly. maybe you should try harder to explain what you mean when you say cops shouldn't be sued for doing their job after someone asks should cops be sued for shooting innocent people.
 
By the way - really? you think liberals won't decry this violence? Liberals are the ones who always call out police abuse. Not sure where some alternate perception came from.
 
tekkychick said:
I have no idea who Desh is, but if we were related I believe posting that would be against the rules, right? no personal info on the forums? Maybe I'm related, maybe I'm not. Really can't say.

"badge bunny"?

didn't I just say that the cops would not even be facing an inquiry if he had shot back? Sadly, he's dead. It seems to be due to police stupidity or brutality (we can't say for sure till all facts are in - but 115 bullets? seriously?) I only brought up how gun rights people might say if he had just had enough guns, he would have outshot the police, and the real trouble is he didn't have enough guns because of Zappa's comment re how he's never said only police should have guns.

I realize it's a tangent but hey - that happens.

At any rate - if he had fired back, cops would have been off scot-free. I certainly hope now this gets thoroughly investigated.
Click to expand...
the fact that he didn't even fire a gun and still ended up dead probably should lead people to believe that police are a clear and present danger to society, that maybe we should indeed group together and start firing back.
 
tekkychick said:
By the way - really? you think liberals won't decry this violence? Liberals are the ones who always call out police abuse. Not sure where some alternate perception came from.
Click to expand...

spend enough time on here and you will see some of the board liberals not only support police brutality, but celebrate the deaths of their victims. to whit, zappa nearly doing cheers for the death of a 72 year old man who dared carry a gun for protection in his own driveway.
 
tekkychick said:
I have no idea who Desh is, but if we were related I believe posting that would be against the rules, right? no personal info on the forums? Maybe I'm related, maybe I'm not. Really can't say.

Sadly you need to go back and read the rules. It is not against the rules for you to post personal information although the mods frown upon it, although I guess if Desh were related to you and you posted it against her will that could be grounds for a slap on the wrist. His Grindness may have to weigh in on that one. Regardless, you seem to have the same intelligence as Desh, but I am making a rash judgement so we will see how it turns out. I am rarely if ever wrong

"badge bunny"?

I only brought up how gun rights people might say if he had just had enough guns, he would have outshot the police, and the real trouble is he didn't have enough guns because of Zappa's comment re how he's never said only police should have guns.

Who says this? He was gunned down. All of a sudden days later they find a gun in his car.

I realize it's a tangent but hey - that happens.

At any rate - if he had fired back, cops would have been off scot-free. I certainly hope now this gets thoroughly investigated.
Click to expand...

But he never fired a shot. Did you hear a shot before they unloaded? I didn't
 
With all the crazies like Westboro Baptist Church we should require licenses to believe in something, a license for free speech. Oh that's right, those aren't privileges, those are RIGHTS.
 
tekkychick said:
By the way - really? you think liberals won't decry this violence? Liberals are the ones who always call out police abuse. Not sure where some alternate perception came from.
Click to expand...

Considering this happened 2 years ago and you are just learning about it, yeah, I would say you guys aren't decrying this violence. You are selective in your outrage.

Trayvon = BAD
This guy = GOOD
 
SmarterthanYou said:
at least I was polite about this one instead of using copsucker or badge blower. consider that a gift of seriousness.
Click to expand...


Oh my heavens YES...that was SOOOOOOOOOO polite of you!

My apologies!

How could I have EVER gotten upset by such a "polite" attempt at honest discussion?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
don't dish it out if you can't take it. now, WHY should there be a license to own a gun, but not a license to vote?

don't blame others for your bullshit claims or inability to express yourself clearly. maybe you should try harder to explain what you mean when you say cops shouldn't be sued for doing their job after someone asks should cops be sued for shooting innocent people.
Click to expand...


Tell ya what?

All you've got to do is find one single quote from me saying I want ONLY the police to have guns and I will apologize.

Socrtease said:
How dare you all malign these fine upstanding professionals who are the only people who should have guns. Where is Zappa when you need him?
Click to expand...

You say I don't make myself clear and should try harder to explain...just show me where I've EVER stated that cops should be the ONLY ones with guns.

I bet you can't.

I bet this was just more partisan sniping because you don't agree with my opinions.
 
tekkychick said:
Wow. Will be interesting to see what is discovered as the investigation moves forward; just hope some outside agency will investigate. 115 bullets? for one guy? wow. Something stinks to high heaven, based on what we know so far.
Click to expand...

What the 'investigation' will find is likely several commendations fore heroism to be issued. Because ya know, that's how they roll.
 
tekkychick said:
By the way - really? you think liberals won't decry this violence? Liberals are the ones who always call out police abuse. Not sure where some alternate perception came from.
Click to expand...

No, no they won't. The polarization makes it impossible for most leftists to do so. Of course when the pendulum of powers swings the other way, you'll find the situation reversed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top