DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
"... condones beating slaves...."What am I misunderstanding, exactly?
"... condones beating slaves...."What am I misunderstanding, exactly?
No I don't. One is a behavior.You don't see the similarity between "God hates homosexuality" and "God hates fags"?
"... condones beating slaves...."
Exodus is the story of the Jews escaping Egypt. What does that have to do with Christianity?Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property. Exodus 21:20-21
Exodus is the story of the Jews escaping Egypt. What does that have to do with Christianity?
So you don't accept the OT as scripture? It has no bearing on your life?
It is very much a part of Catholism, he is hilarious.
It gives a historical perspective for a deeper understanding. Again, what does the story of the Jews escaping Egypt have to do with God sanctioning Christians to beat slaves?So you don't accept the OT as scripture? It has no bearing on your life?
It gives a historical perspective for a deeper understanding. Again, what does the story of the Jews escaping Egypt have to do with God sanctioning Christians to beat slaves?
We've already established that you don't believe in God, so your opinion on related matters is irrelevant.
The funny part is that even IF the OT has no bearing on Christianity whatsoever, it is still the same god. So either way you look at it, their god thinks it is OK to beat your slave (so long as you don't kill them...how moral).
I can't change history, so no, I don't have a problem with that. Is that why you reject God?I didn't say that your god condones christians beating slaves. But the same god DID condone the Jews beating their slaves. Same god, same book. You don't have a problem with that?
God hates homosexuality. Wouldn't you agree?
I can't change history, so no, I don't have a problem with that.
Is that why you reject God?
The New Testament authors use the Old Testament to validate Jesus as the messiah and you are correct, it is the same G-d.
Next time, perhaps you might phrase your question a bit more specifically if you don't want me to answer.
Even if we accept that your god exists; if this god hated gays/lesbians - then why do they exist? why do they prosper? why do they go to church without getting hit by lightening bolts?
you may not accept this, but your bible was written by people. People who put their own interpretations of what they thought your god wanted in it. It is not a direct lecture by your god. And with translations and the passage of time- who knows what your god really likes or dislikes?
How do you justify that opinion?No. I wouldn't.
The Talmud was compiled by people, but handed down word-for-word from Moses, who received it first-hand from God at Mt. Sinai.
So it was OK for the Jews to beat their slaves?
My primary reason for rejecting the very concept of god is that there is no evidence for its existence. On the contrary, everything that we know about the universe indicates that everything (including life itself) is the product of unguided natural processes. There are too many examples of poor design in nature for there to be a designer.
But yes, that is part of the reason. Why should I follow a god that is LESS moral than I am?