The Tesla hype

C

canceled.2021.1

#AMERICAISDEAD
Much was made a here a week or so ago about the wonders of Tesla and how it was a "beacon" of gobblement perfection and its ONE quarter of profitability. Well, someone did some digging into their numbers and VOILA, as I suspected, it is all fucking hype.

http://beta.fool.com/jjt218/2013/06/03/debunking-the-tesla-myth/35219/?source=TheMotleyFool


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/teslas-hazard-lights-flashing-103000123.html.


http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/21/news/companies/tesla-windfall/index.html

Now I know the pie in the sky fools who have a hard on for "electric engines" will stick their noses in the air and scoff at such foolishness, but numbers don't lie. Suffice it to say, selling these credits is not a model for future success in the auto business. Or maybe it is. Maybe their entire model is to lose money on cars but sell the credits to everyone else.

If you think about it, it would be genius and once again show the folly of gobblement intervention with these bogus CAFE standards. Tesla takes taxpayer money to presumably make electric cars. They don't make any other types of cars so they are swimming in the ZEV (look it up if you don't know). All of its competitors like Nissan and GM make other models besides electric cars so it will be a challenge for them to meet the gobblement regulations while still making a car people want to buy. Enter the selling of the ZEV. Tesla makes money and everyone meets their gobblement quota. Genius.

But alas this too will not last.
 
Last edited:
The advances in battery life alone will keep Tesla moving ahead. They are not swimming in profits? Really? A $75k car with no brand recognition isn't selling in our robust economy?? Say it ain't so!
 
WinterBorn said:
The advances in battery life alone will keep Tesla moving ahead. They are not swimming in profits? Really? A $75k car with no brand recognition isn't selling in our robust economy?? Say it ain't so!
Click to expand...

I know you are so in love with the technology you won't look at the facts on the ground. The truth of the matter is that the cars themselves are not profitable. The truth of the matter is that folks like you masturbated all over the board. But, as always when you dig a little deeper you see that it is one big fraud.
 
What I guess I like best about the final, conclusive and uncontrovertible capital "t" Truth that Tesla is a big fraud is that it comes from an investment advice webiste that currently recommends Tesla to its readership.

LOLerpops.
 
Dungheap said:
What I guess I like best about the final, conclusive and uncontrovertible capital "t" Truth that Tesla is a big fraud is that it comes from an investment advice webiste that currently recommends Tesla to its readership.

LOLerpops.
Click to expand...

I understand if you don't understand what you didn't read.

BTW, I posted three separate links from three separate sites

PWND
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Yes...


You got PWNED BIGTIME!!
Click to expand...

Only in your imagination. Unless of course you are saying that their profitability came from selling cars (not) and not from selling ZEVs (did).

Feel free to dig into their annual report and prove it wrong. Otherwise accept your bitchslapping like a man. I see nobody else has tried to refute it. The closest was Winterborns lame attempt about "batteries blah blah blah"

I win again
 
Selling pollution credits to other manufacturers is nothing new. Profit is profit, regadless of the product sold. Your argument is imaginary outrage at a non existant issue, but then so are most of your other threads.

The other thing you seem blind to is that Tesla is in it's infancy. How many firms are instanly profitable, especially new and unknown tech?

How long did Amazon. com lose money, moron, and for how long did you predict their doom?

By the way, don't bother to answer this post.

I don't give a shit about refuting your lies more than once per thread.
 
I Love America said:
Only in your imagination. Unless of course you are saying that their profitability came from selling cars (not) and not from selling ZEVs (did).

Feel free to dig into their annual report and prove it wrong. Otherwise accept your bitchslapping like a man. I see nobody else has tried to refute it. The closest was Winterborns lame attempt about "batteries blah blah blah"

I win again
Click to expand...

The only thing you won is the shit you just took in your hand instead of the restroom. Keep proving yourself a moron, your reputation grows by leaps and bounds.
 
Rune said:
Selling pollution credits to other manufacturers is nothing new. Profit is profit, regadless of the product sold. Your argument is imaginary outrage at a non existant issue, but then so are most of your other threads.

The other thing you seem blind to is that Tesla is in it's infancy. How many firms are instanly profitable, especially new and unknown tech?

How long did Amazon. com lose money, moron, and for how long did you predict their doom?

By the way, don't bother to answer this post.

I don't give a shit about refuting your lies more than once per thread.
Click to expand...

Sorry but you don't dictate what I respond to.

You like other nimrods seem to be very adept at arguing things I didn't claim. I didn't claim that selling the credits is "new".

The entire point which apparently is lost on you was that Tesla is not this stunning success of selling electric cars. Now I could point you to the threads that hyped this after they posted earnings. The point was that there is more to the story. It was being passed off as if their so called "success story" was 100% due to selling cars. As I showed that is not the case. As the articles point out selling those credits are not sustainable. Ask Enron.

As for your Amazon non sequitur, it is irrelevant because Amazon wasn't relying on taxpayer dollars the way Tesla did.


Now kindly go fuck yourself. With all due respect of course
 
Don't these things just cause pollution somewhere else? That is, unless the electricity is made from Nuke power, which liberals despise.
 
I Love America said:
Sorry but you don't dictate what I respond to.

You like other nimrods seem to be very adept at arguing things I didn't claim. I didn't claim that selling the credits is "new".

The entire point which apparently is lost on you was that Tesla is not this stunning success of selling electric cars. Now I could point you to the threads that hyped this after they posted earnings. The point was that there is more to the story. It was being passed off as if their so called "success story" was 100% due to selling cars. As I showed that is not the case. As the articles point out selling those credits are not sustainable. Ask Enron.

As for your Amazon non sequitur, it is irrelevant because Amazon wasn't relying on taxpayer dollars the way Tesla did.


Now kindly go fuck yourself. With all due respect of course
Click to expand...


Well then by all means point us to the threads that hyped Tesla's "stunning success selling cars".

I remember threads touting Tesla paying off their loan early and beating investor predictions, but not one thread passed off their success story as being 100% due to selling cars.

Back up your bullshit or admit that's just what it is.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Well then by all means point us to the threads that hyped Tesla's "stunning success selling cars".

I remember threads touting Tesla paying off their loan early and beating investor predictions, but not one thread passed off their success story as being 100% due to selling cars.

Back up your bullshit or admit that's just what it is.
Click to expand...

Which everyone assumed to be from selling these fantastic cars right? Everyone failed to mention the little fact that their profit wouldn't have been possible without the CREDITS. Don't play semantics with me. In fact wasn't it your bullshit thread? You don't even know what the fuck you are talking about.

PWND again.

I win again
 
I Love America said:
Which everyone assumed to be from selling these fantastic cars right? Everyone failed to mention the little fact that their profit wouldn't have been possible without the CREDITS. Don't play semantics with me. In fact wasn't it your bullshit thread? You don't even know what the fuck you are talking about.

PWND again.

I win again
Click to expand...


You claimed people were touting Tesla's profitability as being "100% due to selling cars"...you just made that statement.

I asked you to back up your allegation.

You can't/won't.

You got PWNED to the BONE!

I WIN AGAIN!
 
I Love America said:
Sorry but you don't dictate what I respond to.

You like other nimrods seem to be very adept at arguing things I didn't claim. I didn't claim that selling the credits is "new".

The entire point which apparently is lost on you was that Tesla is not this stunning success of selling electric cars. Now I could point you to the threads that hyped this after they posted earnings. The point was that there is more to the story. It was being passed off as if their so called "success story" was 100% due to selling cars. As I showed that is not the case. As the articles point out selling those credits are not sustainable. Ask Enron.

As for your Amazon non sequitur, it is irrelevant because Amazon wasn't relying on taxpayer dollars the way Tesla did.


Now kindly go fuck yourself. With all due respect of course
Click to expand...


I am bored and waiting for a friend to contact me, so I will refute more of your bullshit;

1. Enter the selling of the ZEV. Clearly making a profit selling credits is new to you or why would you be complaining about it?
2.The entire point which apparently is lost on you was that Tesla is not this stunning success of selling electric cars. Yet. Rome wasn't built in a day, moron.
3. As the articles point out selling those credits are not sustainable. Ask Enron.Enron had no product moron. Tesla actually creates the credits. Talk about non-sequitur
4. Kindly fuck off and die, conservatard.
 
Rune said:
I am bored and waiting for a friend to contact me, so I will refute more of your bullshit;

1. Enter the selling of the ZEV. Clearly making a profit selling credits is new to you or why would you be complaining about it?
2.The entire point which apparently is lost on you was that Tesla is not this stunning success of selling electric cars. Yet. Rome wasn't built in a day, moron.
3. As the articles point out selling those credits are not sustainable. Ask Enron.Enron had no product moron. Tesla actually creates the credits. Talk about non-sequitur
4. Kindly fuck off and die, conservatard.
Click to expand...

You can't help yourself bitch. You obviously don't understand.

BTW, given your poor health should you really be wishing ill on someone like that? tsk tsk tsp. for shame
 
I Love America said:
You can't help yourself bitch. You obviously don't understand.

BTW, given your poor health should you really be wishing ill on someone like that? tsk tsk tsp. for shame
Click to expand...

Thanks for admitting you have no counter argument.

How does it feel to be repeatedly pwned in your own thread, dumbass?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top