Was the verdict unjust?

Big Money

New member
A man shot and killed a teenaged youth.

He claimed self-defense and was acquitted by a jury.

Was the verdict unjust?
 
I'm glad someone asked this question because this has been a topic this board has been too scare to touch. It's amazing it took a new poster with no prior knowledge of this board to have the guts to bring this up.
 
I'm glad someone asked this question because this has been a topic this board has been too scare to touch. It's amazing it took a new poster with no prior knowledge of this board to have the guts to bring this up.

I think Patriot was hoping one of the more liberal posters would jump in assuming the discussion was about Zimmerman. The story he linked is not Zimmie.
 
i don't care what the "law" says or if the accused didn't actually "do anything illegal." My feels tell me they should be in jail, and I believe our justice system should run off of my feels.
 
So, you are employing the same method you used in the Zimmerman case.

actually I am parodying you and others. the law is pretty clear. that's why he was found not guilty. suck on that.

Zimmerman - still not guilty.. 2 weeks and change later.
Baxter.. still not over it... 2 weeks and change later.
 
I read the linked article. I assume you are correct when you said the jury ruled not guilty. I saw nothing in the article that would make me disagree with the jury. So no, based on what I've read here, the verdict was not unjust, IMO.
 
A man shot and killed a teenaged youth.

He claimed self-defense and was acquitted by a jury.

Was the verdict unjust?

No specifics on this case you speak of........did he stare at the kid for a minute and 20 seconds from a car then run after him for 20 seconds? Because in the rain, that would creep anyone out. Yawn.
 
I doubt any jury would have ignored a bullet hole in the back.

I would have to see the evidence in the case.
 
Back
Top