A Death Knell for the McJob?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 23.5% of minimum wage workers are between 16-19, and 26% are between 20-24.

The difference between the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Center for Economic and Policy Research would be that the BLS uses data, and the far left George Soros funded Center for Economic and Policy Research operates on propaganda and misrepresentations to further their ideology.
 
Another Marxist Union propaganda piece from the forums pet dimwit.

One thing we can always be certain about, leftist dimwits have a complete disregard for the truth, facts or reality. If they have their way, there won't be any businesses left; but then they will just blame George Bush. They really are THAT incredibly stupid.
 
Truth Detector said:
Another Marxist Union propaganda piece from the forums pet dimwit.

One thing we can always be certain about, leftist dimwits have a complete disregard for the truth, facts or reality. If they have their way, there won't be any businesses left; but then they will just blame George Bush. They really are THAT incredibly stupid.
Click to expand...
You are soo poor, you don't know how much better stocks do under dem presidents.
 
The Dude said:
You are soo poor, you don't know how much better stocks do under dem presidents.
Click to expand...

Another brain dead repugnant post insulting the poor; color me surprised. And once again you are wrong dimwit; i am far from poor. But then, you are prone to making remarkably stupid claims due to the incredible amount of ignorance you wallow in.

But thank you again for being a shining example of stupid and a reminder of why trolling dimwits like you should be threadbanned to prevent threads from having their IQ level lowered by each and everyone of your posts.

Yes dimwit; you really are that incredibly stupid and repugnant.

As for your moronic claim that stock markets do much better under Dems than Repugs, why don't you provide an intelligent and factual explanation of why you believe that Presidents affect stock markets; it should be as remarkably ignorant as your repugnant ability to insult working people.

Then when you are done, try to explain how the current stock market gains have anything to do with a strong growing economy right now.
 
evince said:
yeah because bad public relations is always good for sales.

come get out and get away to Mc Donnalds where we don't pay .

who the hell do you think eats at mickyDs?


wealthy people?

hahahahahahahahahahahah
Click to expand...


what is really good for sales is doubling labor costs for the same product without any additional skill required of the workers.
 
evince said:
unfair treatment will not stand forever.


when you create a society that is too poor to buy much but the VERY basics you don't have a vibrant economy.


don't blame me do your hating on capitalism for that fact
Click to expand...


So you are willing to go to your tenants and cut their rent in half? Go do that today Desh. They will love to here how you want to treat them fairly.
 
Superfreak said:
So you are willing to go to your tenants and cut their rent in half? Go do that today Desh. They will love to here how you want to treat them fairly.
Click to expand...

I'm quite certain that would dramatically increase their income thus helping the economy. But alas; leftists use OTHER people's money to buy the votes of low information twits and never their own.

You see, their "caring" extends only as far as others pocket books, never their own.
 
AssHatZombie said:
And what are republicans going to do to reverse the globalization idiocy that has made all the jobs disappear? Anything?
Click to expand...

Globalization is a good thing. Why do you hate that poorer countries are gaining ground by taking the lower skilled jobs? How about you just get off your ass and learn a trade or get a valid degree that will help you with a higher skilled job?
 
Superfreak said:
Globalization is a good thing. Why do you hate that poorer countries are gaining ground by taking the lower skilled jobs? How about you just get off your ass and learn a trade or get a valid degree that will help you with a higher skilled job?
Click to expand...

It's a bad thing. Provably. I care about Americans first. Im not an internationalist fascist like you and Obama.
 
AssHatZombie said:
It's a bad thing. Provably. I care about Americans first. Im not an internationalist fascist like you and Obama.
Click to expand...

By all means... show us your evidence if it is provable.

What you don't seem to understand is that by shipping low skill jobs overseas, by creating middle classes in China, India etc... you are expanding worldwide demand for goods and services. That HELPS the US overall. But we have to train our workers to either develop trade skills, which will always be in demand in the US or they need a higher education in areas that will be in demand in the US.

If you want to be a nationalist or isolationist, that is your choice of course... but that is NOT in the best interest of Americans.
 
Superfreak said:
By all means... show us your evidence if it is provable.

What you don't seem to understand is that by shipping low skill jobs overseas, by creating middle classes in China, India etc... you are expanding worldwide demand for goods and services. That HELPS the US overall. But we have to train our workers to either develop trade skills, which will always be in demand in the US or they need a higher education in areas that will be in demand in the US.

If you want to be a nationalist or isolationist, that is your choice of course... but that is NOT in the best interest of Americans.
Click to expand...

Just google destruction of the middle class. Knock yourself out. Im right. I don't have time to educate your stupid ass. America was doing much better prior to this current climate of hyper-globalization.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Just google destruction of the middle class. Knock yourself out. Im right. I don't have time to educate your stupid ass. America was doing much better prior to this current climate of hyper-globalization.
Click to expand...

You just said it was provable. Which means you can provide evidence. Don't take the cowardly route and expect me to go out and try and find the evidence you say exists. Link us up. Back up YOUR position.
 
Superfreak said:
You just said it was provable. Which means you can provide evidence. Don't take the cowardly route and expect me to go out and try and find the evidence you say exists. Link us up. Back up YOUR position.
Click to expand...

I can. but I choose not to right now. I have posted the proof in many other threads.

I'll tell you what, if you actually type the words "Globalization has only had a positive impact for American workers", I will get you some articles. Otherwise, im not doing busywork without someone putting up a counterargument.
 
Truth Detector said:
Another brain dead repugnant post insulting the poor; color me surprised. And once again you are wrong dimwit; i am far from poor. But then, you are prone to making remarkably stupid claims due to the incredible amount of ignorance you wallow in.

But thank you again for being a shining example of stupid and a reminder of why trolling dimwits like you should be threadbanned to prevent threads from having their IQ level lowered by each and everyone of your posts.

Yes dimwit; you really are that incredibly stupid and repugnant.

As for your moronic claim that stock markets do much better under Dems than Repugs, why don't you provide an intelligent and factual explanation of why you believe that Presidents affect stock markets; it should be as remarkably ignorant as your repugnant ability to insult working people.

Then when you are done, try to explain how the current stock market gains have anything to do with a strong growing economy right now.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you would dissmiss facts
You have shown no proclivity as to why anything affects markets
 
AssHatZombie said:
I can. but I choose not to right now. I have posted the proof in many other threads.

I'll tell you what, if you actually type the words "Globalization has only had a positive impact for American workers", I will get you some articles. Otherwise, im not doing busywork without someone putting up a counterargument.
Click to expand...

I already stated the counter argument and asked for your so called evidence. You are deliberately avoiding doing so because you know it is not actually provable, but rather some left wing ranting from a blog you found somewhere.
 
http://economics.about.com/od/globalizationtrade/l/aaglobalization.htm

Globalisation and Poverty:
Globalisation in the form of increased integration though trade and investment is an important reason why much progress has been made in reducing poverty and global inequality over recent decades. But it is not the only reason for this often unrecognised progress, good national polices , sound institutions and domestic political stability also matter.

Despite this progress, poverty remains one of the most serious international challenges we face up to 1.2 billion of the developing world 4.8 billion people still live in extreme poverty.

But the proportion of the world population living in poverty has been steadily declining and since 1980 the absolute number of poor people has stopped rising and appears to have fallen in recent years despite strong population growth in poor countries. If the proportion living in poverty had not fallen since 1987 alone a further 215million people would be living in extreme poverty today.
Click to expand...
 
The stock market bubble is due to low interest rates from the fed. The Friends of the Financial Sector group have to do something with the money they keep rolling off the printing presses, and they have to do SOMETHING with it, and stocks are the best vehicles for obfuscating whats actually happening with money. They're the easiest to create a bubble in. So that's what they're doing. This is why the "tapering" discussion is so hot on cnbc. So hot they now have different words like "tightening" which is allegedly something different.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top