16-Year-Old Drunk Driver Who Killed Four Escapes Jail — Because He Is Rich!

Not really. Today's prosecuting attorney could be tomorrow's defense attorney. They'll work from a rotation pool.

They would have no personal career motivation, other than pursuit of truth and justice.

Yes, really. Nothing you wrote here counters my argument, moron. If anything you have made it worse as your rotation of lawyers would create camaraderie among defense and prosecution.
 
So lawyers have no professional ethics?

The hell, you say!

Who said that and what relevance does it have?

You are another stupid fascist prick who only cares about the partisan fight. You see lawyers as "liberals" and think that anything that hurts them then is good. I don't really care about that and am more concerned that our justice system works fairly and effectively.
 
You are having difficulty identifying anything that was fabricated. You said it was a "fake story" and "made up political nonsense." What fact is made up?

The part about him escaping jail because he was rich?

Are you trying to be purposefully stupid?


Nowhere in the alternet story is anything stated about "scot free" and it does state the judge "sentenced him to a decade of probation." The title states he escaped jail, which is true.

He didn't "escape jail" you dimwit; he was SIXTEEN and sentenced to ten years probation with treatment. As the REAL story indicated, the jurist didn't let him "escape justice because he was rich", she indicated that if he were incarcerated, he would be out in two years only to risk more lives.

As for him being rich; he came from a very dysfunctional family and his parents wealth had nothing to do with his behavior as much as his lack of a normal family life which is typical of any juvenile criminal.

Again, for the mentally challenged, he didn't get away with anything and this was a tragic case of very ppor judgement by someone incapable of good judgment. That is the REAL story; not the made up nonsense in the Alternet suggesting that it is "priveledge" that keeps one out of jail. That's just stupid.


The alternet story says that his defense was that "his rich parents spoiled him," which is again confirmed by the Star Telegram story.

There is nothing in the alternet story that is misleading in any material way.

Another fool who thinks that purposeful omission is not misleading.

My original comments are unchanged.

Well goody for you.
 
It would also have a sort of built-in tort reform. Since lawyers would now be civil servants working for the government, they wouldn't get greedy and look for inflated settlements in civil cases, of which they'd walk away with 50% of if they were still in private practice.

And all of the settlement money would go to the plaintiff.

And the loser wouldn't have to pay the settlement AND a huge lawyer fee.

This tort reform would also lower health care costs, and prevent defensive medicine.

So what's the stumbling block?

Another brilliant tome; you are to be commended for your incredible insight and get a Nobel Peace Prize for how much more you care about the people than anyone else! ;)
 
Every position, or just this one?

Pretty much, every position. He's even going weak on his opposition to the drug war because he is afraid to offend the Republicans while apologizing for them on it.

You are less of a partisan Republican kiss ass than he is at this point.
 
Who said that and what relevance does it have?

You are another stupid fascist prick who only cares about the partisan fight. You see lawyers as "liberals" and think that anything that hurts them then is good. I don't really care about that and am more concerned that our justice system works fairly and effectively.

It never takes leftist long to erupt.

:thisisgettinggood:
 
The part about him escaping jail because he was rich?

Are you trying to be purposefully stupid?


He didn't "escape jail" you dimwit; he was SIXTEEN and sentenced to ten years probation with treatment. As the REAL story indicated, the jurist didn't let him "escape justice because he was rich", she indicated that if he were incarcerated, he would be out in two years only to risk more lives.

As for him being rich; he came from a very dysfunctional family and his parents wealth had nothing to do with his behavior as much as his lack of a normal family life which is typical of any juvenile criminal.

Again, for the mentally challenged, he didn't get away with anything and this was a tragic case of very ppor judgement by someone incapable of good judgment. That is the REAL story; not the made up nonsense in the Alternet suggesting that it is "priveledge" that keeps one out of jail. That's just stupid.

The alternet story says that his defense was that "his rich parents spoiled him," which is again confirmed by the Star Telegram story.

Another fool who thinks that purposeful omission is not misleading.

Well goody for you.

You have failed again.

He is escaping jail; his defense was largely about him being rich and spoiled. Probation is not jail. A private treatment center is not jail.
 
Pretty much, every position. He's even going weak on his opposition to the drug war because he is afraid to offend the Republicans while apologizing for them on it.

You are less of a partisan Republican kiss ass than he is at this point.

But we can always count on your kiss ass leftist diatribes can’t we?

Dimwit.
 
You have failed again.

He is escaping jail; his defense was largely about him being rich and spoiled. Probation is not jail. A private treatment center is not jail.

Wrong again dimwit; he is on a ten year probation which will be harsher than a petty two year term in prison as a juvenile delinquent and he will receive much needed treatment.

Once again the Marxist leftists illustrate how little they care about others. It is an interesting irony and level of ignorance common with leftists. They only care if those who are in need parrot their moronic failed ideology.
 
???

I think you are the one that erupted arguing the article was fake and made up.

My claim was accurate; yours would be an eruption: You are another stupid fascist prick who only cares about the partisan fight.

But you’re a dimwit; dimwits are incapable of comprehending their own hypocrisy and the irony of their remarks, they really are THAT stupid.
 
Wrong again dimwit; he is on a ten year probation which will be harsher than a petty two year term in prison as a juvenile delinquent and he will receive much needed treatment.

Once again the Marxist leftists illustrate how little they care about others. It is an interesting irony and level of ignorance common with leftists. They only care if those who are in need parrot their moronic failed ideology.

Nothing you just wrote indicates I was wrong. Probation is not jail, idiot. Maybe you need to consult yahoo answers?

I am the furthest thing from a Marxist and that is not a fascist, which is what you are.
 
Taft is a leftist now?

Out-of-the-box thinkers like myself are always persecuted for wanting to use the government to ensure equal justice and protection under the law.

It's the evil corporatists that align up against us. As long as they can deploy their army of overpriced lawyers to attack us, the crony capitalist fascists are happy.
 
Nothing you just wrote indicates I was wrong. Probation is not jail, idiot. Maybe you need to consult yahoo answers?

I never said probation was jail dimwit; I indicated that ten years’ probation with treatment was correctly perceived by the jurist in the case as being the harsher option than incarceration which would have resulted in him serving a mere two years.

But you're an idiot stuck on stupid and determined to defend Marxist meme of the threads author and source.

I am the furthest thing from a Marxist and that is not a fascist, which is what you are.

Well dimwit; if you sound like a Marxist and rant like a Marxist, you just might be a Marxist.

Who did you vote for in the last six Presidential elections?
 
Back
Top