Gallup Proves Those With Least Education Consistently Vote Democrat

again... point me to one lie I have told here or anywhere else. you can't. stfu.

Like I said:
We've been over this.
You're nothing more then a gun smuggling liar and your attempts to deny your own behavior only compounds your criminal thinking and attitude.
 
still no link to any lie I ever told? hmmmmmm. why am I not surprised?

YOU are the liar for calling me one and being unable to prove that slander.
 
Yeah. I don't like paying for stuff i don't need.

Who was this poster and why were they banned? Shouldn't there be some central banned notification thread or something instead of just the "Banned" appearing and no information anywhere about why or even what happened. In this case I can't find any offensive posts, by that I mean no references to the only thing that can supposedly get you banned here--pedophilia, or as I was warned, writing the "t" word, so what did this person do?
 
Who was this poster and why were they banned? Shouldn't there be some central banned notification thread or something instead of just the "Banned" appearing and no information anywhere about why or even what happened. In this case I can't find any offensive posts, by that I mean no references to the only thing that can supposedly get you banned here--pedophilia, or as I was warned, writing the "t" word, so what did this person do?

Well,,,, he was replying to my post if it helps in some kind of way.

Was he banned after replying to me?
 
Shouldn't there be some central banned notification thread or something instead of just the "Banned" appearing and no information anywhere about why or even what happened. In this case I can't find any offensive posts, by that I mean no references to the only thing that can supposedly get you banned here--pedophilia, or as I was warned, writing the "t" word, so what did this person do?

I asked for the very same thing on a forum (p.com) and Jeffro and his fellow authoritarian overlords banned me for life. :rolleyes:

Clearly on this forum there's very little cause for concern about moderation abuse. Over there I received a warning for calling someone a "miscreant" and was told that one more such "schoolyard insult" (SYI is in their rules) would get me banned. lol. So there they basically make up the rules as they go along.

I got a ban for calling Tim Tebow fans "twats".... and a simple search turned up that a passel of liberals used the word routinely. First time a conservative used it... BAN!

JPP is a completely different creature. The non-instrusiveness of the moderation staff is a breath of fresh air.
 
still no link to any lie I ever told? hmmmmmm. why am I not surprised?

YOU are the liar for calling me one and being unable to prove that slander.



they don't use facts.

they use lies and slander.


Its the only way they can cling to their historically failed ideas.
 
Wrong again dimwit; my trademark is exposing rabid brain dead hyper partisan asshats like you for what you are; an uninformed lying leftist dullard filled with hypocrisy and irony who can't think for himself and parrots DNC memes like a trained circus monkey.

You wouldn't know a fact it walked up to you and introduced itself to you.

Fact: hello dimwit, I'm a fact.

Dimwit: nuhuh, you're a tea party racist who watches Fox news and thinks George Bush didn't lie us into war!!!

Carry on dimwit; your lying and feigned ignorance has once again been exposed.



good does that mean you will begin accepting court documented facts that stretch all the way to the Scotus?


Ill go get them so you can affirm you now accept facts
 
http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-co...-in-voting-rights-consent-decree-2564238.html


US Supreme Court on Monday turned aside a petition from the Republican National Committee to lift a 30-year-old consent decree. The decree requires the RNC to refrain from tactics that could suppress voting rights.

By Warren Richey - Christian Science Monitor

The US Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up a request by the Republican National Committee to lift a 30-year-old consent decree that restricts the political party’s ability to enforce pre-election ballot security programs that critics say would result in minority voter suppression.

The high court, without comment, turned aside the Republican Party’s petition.
 
how wonderful to know TD will now help us fight the voter ID laws which keep American voters from voting.


facts yet again save the day
 
how wonderful to know TD will now help us fight the voter ID laws which keep American voters from voting.


facts yet again save the day

Dear dimwit; voter ID laws do not prevent voters from voting; they prevent illegal voting by those who cannot legally vote. But you're a racist dimwit who believes minorities are too stupid to get something as common as personal identification.

You represent a repugnant and ignorant ideology invested in, and ensuring that minorities remain on the Democrat plantation promoting a special brand of stupid at every opportunity and epitomized by the dumbest man to ever have been VP when he uttered the repugnant claim that Republicans wanted to keep blacks in chains.

The latent racism that infests the Democratic party is repugnant and despicable. But that's okay because minorities can be reassured by the DNC through empty rhetoric that constantly reminds them how much more Liberals care than anyone else on the planet.
 
If the ID that is required to vote costs money, and if the registered voter has no practical need or use for the ID beyond voting, then the cost of that ID is a de facto poll tax. If voter ID were given free of charge to every registered voter, I, for one, would have no problem with it whatsoever.
 
If the ID that is required to vote costs money, and if the registered voter has no practical need or use for the ID beyond voting, then the cost of that ID is a de facto poll tax. If voter ID were given free of charge to every registered voter, I, for one, would have no problem with it whatsoever.

Let's address your weak, moronic talking points; every State that has instuted voter ID accommodates those too stupid and poor to pay for and get a valid ID...as if such people exist other than illegals.

As for the claim that there could be a human being in the modern world who has no need for an ID, that is the most incredibly stupid claim anyone could ever make. You can't cash a check or open a bank account without one. You cannot get a job without one. Therefore, unless you are getting cash under the table to earn a living, like illegals, you cannot survive.

That has to be the dumbest excuse to support the latent racism Liberls wallow in who think minorities are too stupid to accommodate the real world need for ID.

I'm quite certain that if ID cards we're handed out to everyone who needed it, you would still parrot the dimwitted leftist talking points you use as a substitute for independent thought.
 
Errrrrr, Waterboy's been to college!

1312638292_the-waterboy1.jpg
 
Back
Top