budget deal helps economy

The Dude said:
You just said you aren't rich
I said it's blatantly obvious
Click to expand...

I didn't say I wasn't rich. When did I claim I was or was not rich?

But I do invest; I asked how do you know that I don't?

I also asked why you think being rich is a substitute for intelligence and character?

Again you read, but cannot comprehend because you simply are too stupid.

It's easy to get rich if you know how to use economics to invest
Click to expand...

It's even easier when you pretend to be internet rich isn't it dimwit? Too bad you can't pretend to have a brain as well.

This is why one cannot argue with idiots like you; you can't remember what is being posted let alone comprehend it, then make nonsense up as you go.
 
why is giving $47 billion annually to oil companies good for our economy? Spending will be $45 billion higher in 2014. Is that a good thing?
 
Truth Detector said:
Reality and statistics are my proof dimwit; all you have is hyper partisan rhetoric and fabrications.

But I will wait for you to provide credible evidence supported by facts how this budget deal will affect the economy.
Click to expand...


Do you ever get tired of being so consistently stupid?
 
Truth Detector said:
I didn't say I wasn't rich. When did I claim I was or was not rich?

But I do invest; I asked how do you know that I don't?

I also asked why you think being rich is a substitute for intelligence and character?

Again you read, but cannot comprehend because you simply are too stupid.

It's even easier when you pretend to be internet rich isn't it dimwit? Too bad you can't pretend to have a brain as well.

This is why one cannot argue with idiots like you; you can't remember what is being posted let alone comprehend it, then make nonsense up as you go.
Click to expand...


Just to be clear: Are you now claiming that you have either intelligence or character?
 
kiki said:
why is giving $47 billion annually to oil companies good for our economy? Spending will be $45 billion higher in 2014. Is that a good thing?
Click to expand...

Dear dimwit; who "gives" $47 billion to oil companies annually?

This is a special kind of ignorance low information voters epitomize when they elect economically stupid dimwits like Obama to the Presidency.
 
Now, since the Communists claim the economy does better when their leaders are in charge? Explain the Carter era where we had double digit interest, unemployment, and inflation!
 
I didn't do this, because I'm tired of doing homework, so I'll just say that this is a SUSPICION of mine. It may well be that the economy has done better under democrat presidents, but what was the makeup of the legislative branch at those times? They control the purse strings, not the president. My money's on conservative control of the legislatures. And you have to take into account that congress wasn't full of mad dog raving lunatic communist democrats(or tea party patriots)even as recently as the Clinton administration.
 
Truth Detector said:
Dear dimwit; what do vote "returns" have to do with the economic malaise of the Carter Presidency?

You really are THAT stupid.
Click to expand...

What does "the economic malaise of the Carter Presidency" have to do with communism? Please be explicit! You might start with some quotes from The Communist Manifesto (1848) to support your claims.
 
According to some here we can identify a banker as a communist when he starts changing "double digit interest." So look at all your credit card bills right now. All of those credit card companies and banks that are charging you double digit interest on your outstanding balances are all communist organizations and should be reported to Ted Cruz immediately!

Please notify Senator Cruz at his Washington D.C. Office. Phone: 202-224-5922
 
Beware many of the righties posting on this thread are complete and absolute idiots with no economic or any other background in monetary matters whatsoever!
 
callinectes said:
I didn't do this, because I'm tired of doing homework, so I'll just say that this is a SUSPICION of mine. It may well be that the economy has done better under democrat presidents, but what was the makeup of the legislative branch at those times? They control the purse strings, not the president. My money's on conservative control of the legislatures. And you have to take into account that congress wasn't full of mad dog raving lunatic communist democrats(or tea party patriots)even as recently as the Clinton administration.
Click to expand...

Excellent question; but also wars and global oil prices, which we have no control over, have a significant economic impact.

To answer your question: from 1940 to the current time, 78 years, Democrats have controlled BOTH houses of Congress for 50 of those years and Republicans only 13.

Republican Presidents were in charge 36 years and only 5 of them with control of the Congress. Democratic Presidents were in charge 42 years and controlled congress for 28 of those years.

It would be very hard to claim that Republican Presidents are to blame for economic malaise with any level of credibility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top