Another Democrat perv guilty of harassing women - and men

B

Big Money

New member
CityCouncilRace-07-04-MicahKellner.jpg


DEMOCRAT​


An ethics committee investigation has found that New York State Assemblyman Micah Kellner violated the Assembly's sexual harassment policy by making inappropriate comments to staff members.


It was also reported that Kellner, who considers himself bisexual, had inappropriate conversations with a male staff member.


Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver said Kellner would be removed from his post.


Kellner also will not be permitted to have interns working in his office, and he will be required to attend sexual harassment training.



http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Probe-finds-NY-lawmaker-sexually-harassed-staff-5103117.php
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/da...sexually-harassing-staff-members-in-2009-2011
 
When Phil Robertson says something inappropriate it's freedom of speech. When Kellner does it's a problem. I'm not sure I understand, please explain.
 
:rofl2:

Whats up with New York Democrats this month....another one in trouble as well.

[h=1]New York State Assemblyman Dennis Gabryszak accused of sexual harassing 3 staffers, allegedly joked he had tattooed penis[/h] [h=2]A legal notice seeking damages charges that Assemblyman Dennis Gabryszak, a 62-year-old married Democrat from suburban Buffalo, pressured the women to stay overnight with him in hotels and join him at massage parlors[/h]
Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, already under fire for his handling of the Vito Lopez scandal, has another sexual harassment controversy on his hands.
Three women who worked for a Buffalo-area assemblyman claim they were subjected to repeated advances and sexually charged comments during their time with the lawmaker, according to court papers filed Thursday.

The women charge that Assemblyman Dennis Gabryszak, a 62-year-old married Democrat, pressured them to stay overnight with him in hotels and visit massage parlors with him.

Gabryszak also joked to one of the women that he had a tattoo on his penis, and he sent videos of himself in a bathroom “either receiving or pretending to receive” oral sex, the legal papers allege.

The women said their complaints about Gabryszak’s behavior were ignored by their immediate supervisor in the assemblyman’s office, Adam E. Locher.
“Rather than report the claimant’s concerns to the Assemblyman, Mr. Locher told the claimant that ‘he didn’t want to be part of a sexual harassment complaint,’” the court papers charge.

There’s nothing in the court papers, however, indicating that the women took their complaints to Silver’s office or to anyone in Assembly leadership.
Silver spokesman Michael Whyland said the speaker was not aware of the women’s allegations until they appeared in the Albany Times-Union newspaper Friday.
“The allegations contained in the Times-Union against Assemblymember Gabryszak are very disturbing and will immediately be referred to the ethics committee for a full investigation,” Whyland said.

“The Assembly is committed to a safe and respectful work environment for all its employees and we take all allegations very seriously.”

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...-staffers-sexual-harassment-article-1.1554013
 
No you must say something that I can argue against!

Why is it okay in your opinion for Robertson to say something inappropriate but not Kellner? It said he allegedly made a joke.
 
Manatee said:
No you must say something that I can argue against!

Why is it okay in your opinion for Robertson to say something inappropriate but not Kellner? It said he allegedly made a joke.
Click to expand...

Did you read the article???

An ethics committee investigation has found that New York State Assemblyman Micah Kellner violated the Assembly's sexual harassment policy by making inappropriate comments to staff members in 2009 and 2011.
 
StormX said:
Did you read the article???

An ethics committee investigation has found that New York State Assemblyman Micah Kellner violated the Assembly's sexual harassment policy by making inappropriate comments to staff members in 2009 and 2011.
Click to expand...

I saw it yes it says he made inappropriate comments just like Phil Robertson.
 
Manatee said:
When Phil Robertson says something inappropriate it's freedom of speech. When Kellner does it's a problem. I'm not sure I understand, please explain.
Click to expand...

Two things; what makes quoting the bible and ones Christian beliefs inappropriate? You and a cabal of arrogant presumptuous Progressive leftists?

Second; if you think that Phil's personal reflections in an interview equate to sexual harassement in the workplace, you're a dunce.

For being the self proclaimed intellects you liberals perceive yourselves to be, you really make incredibly stupid comments and come to incredibly stupid conclusions.
 
Manatee said:
No you must say something that I can argue against!

Why is it okay in your opinion for Robertson to say something inappropriate but not Kellner? It said he allegedly made a joke.
Click to expand...

Do you know what constitutes sexual harassment? Read up, become informed, then maybe we can have a semi-intelligent debate. Otherwise your wasting everyone's time not knowing the difference between harassment, and an interview.
 
Z120T.AuSt.156.jpg



A former staffer accused the state Democrat Party’s executive director of showing him a picture of male genitals, caressing his leg and discussing his sexual exploits, according to new documents obtained by The News & Observer.


The sexual harassment allegations are detailed in a Dec. 8 letter from Adriadn Ortega, a former party staffer, to then-Executive Director Jay Parmley.




http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/04/18/2009875/democratic-party-chairman-rebuts.html#storylink=cpy
 
If something is inappropriate it's inappropriate. Both people said something inappropriate, however they were treated differently. Why is that fair?
 
Mr.Badguy said:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_sex_scandals_in_the_United_States

Awful lot of (R)s on that list, looks to me like sexual promiscuity transcends party affiliation.

edit: sorry for the mobile link, posting from my phone.
Click to expand...

Another liberal who cannot comprehend what he reads.

But in the interest of fairness, why not start your own thread on Republican harassment charges versus this links inclusion of resignations for extra marital affairs and "accusations" and we can see whose list is longer.

Dimwitted cutting and pasting won't suffice.
 
Manatee said:
If something is inappropriate it's inappropriate. Both people said something inappropriate, however they were treated differently. Why is that fair?
Click to expand...

Sexual harassment is not about "innapropriate" dunce; it is breaking the law. Phil's comments were not inappropriate unless you have crowned yourself "decider".

God, liberals are beyond mere dumb.
 
Truth Detector said:
Two things; what makes quoting the bible and ones Christian beliefs inappropriate? You and a cabal of arrogant presumptuous Progressive leftists?

Second; if you think that Phil's personal reflections in an interview equate to sexual harassement in the workplace, you're a dunce.

For being the self proclaimed intellects you liberals perceive yourselves to be, you really make incredibly stupid comments and come to incredibly stupid conclusions.
Click to expand...

He didn't just quote the bible, he made plenty of other insulting remarks that were unnecessary. I'm not saying I do I'm just trying to understand why it's okay for Robertson to say something completely out of line and disrespectful for people of that sexual orientation but it's not okay for a democrat to make a sexual joke that didn't have anything to do with race, gender or sexual orientation.
 
image3151770x.jpg



North Carolina Democrat Party executive director Jay Parmley resigned Sunday in the wake of allegations that he sexually harassed one of his former communications staffers.



Emails indicated that the Democrat Party made a financial settlement with Ortega, and that both Ortega and Parmley signed non-disclosure agreements to keep the incident quiet.



Local news outlets have reported that Ortega was fired after he made the sexual-harassment allegations, and that the state party has not been transparent about his firing since it happened.




http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/15/nc-democrats-executive-director-resigns-in-wake-of-same-sex-sexual-harassment-scandal-party-members-consultants-want-chairman-to-resign-too/#ixzz2p4c0nlom
 
Manatee said:
He didn't just quote the bible, he made plenty of other insulting remarks that were unnecessary. I'm not saying I do I'm just trying to understand why it's okay for Robertson to say something completely out of line and disrespectful for people of that sexual orientation but it's not okay for a democrat to make a sexual joke that didn't have anything to do with race, gender or sexual orientation.
Click to expand...

I will try this ONE more time; Phil expressed an OPINION in an INTERVIEW.

The Democratic politician BROKE the law in a workplace environment.

Now do you understand?

Here; read and become informed:

http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-sex.html
 
Truth Detector said:
I will try this ONE more time; Phil expressed an OPINION in an INTERVIEW.

The Democratic politician BROKE the law in a workplace environment.

Now do you understand?

Here; read and become informed:

http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-sex.html
Click to expand...

"The victim does not have to be the person harassed but could be anyone affected by the offensive conduct.
The harasser's conduct must be unwelcome."

Anyone affected by the offensive conduct. Robertson's opinion was highly offensive to many people. It was unwelcome, it shouldn't have been said, and when you don't have anything nice to say, it's best not to say anything at all.

They have different employers, and in the end it's up to the employer to decide the fate of the employee. I trust the decision of A&E and I'm not going to argue against it because I think it's fair. But I also think that you're quick to yell at a democrat for being inappropriate but you stand by the inappropriate comments made by Phil Robertson, I guess because you think that one is sexual harassment and the other is an okay thing to say. I'm just gunna say that it's not. There is no way you can justify his comments/opinions as appropriate. Times have changed and it's no longer acceptable to treat people differently because of their skin color or sexual orientation. Sorry if you personally feel differently but that's just how it is.

So if I say something against you again does that mean you won't respond? You're tired of debating me on a debate forum? Interesting..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top