Thanks, now I know who GLADD is.
NOW, does anyone have a cite illustrating that they "Whined to get Phil suspended from something"?
Marry girls when they're '15 or 16,' said 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson???
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Thanks, now I know who GLADD is.
NOW, does anyone have a cite illustrating that they "Whined to get Phil suspended from something"?
Are you serious? If you can't remember what the conversation is about from the beginning you need to just stop talking about politics.
You again act like a dishonest dunce; first you answered BMs question with an unrelated typical dimwit question, then pretend that your fellow lefttards on the forum are not inferring Phil engaged in illegal behavior.
So now, as is typical with dimwits like you, we have to unwrap the circle of stupidity you wish to play in.
BM asked you what laws were broken. You didn't answer the question, but instead deflect with a dimwitted question about whether the law should be the final ultimate arbiter of morality as if it has ANYTHING to do with the topic or BMs question.
So because you are a dishonest asshole of epic proportions, let me answer BOTH questions for you dunce; NO-Phil broke no laws nor has he been acused of breaking any laws; and NO - our laws cannot be the final arbiter of morality but they defininately are based on religious moral teachings.
God you Liberals are the most dishonest, hypocritical dunces on the planet.
He's not serious; he's a typical dishonest Liberal asswhipe.
So you don't have a cite?
I don't know that A&E were pressured into the decision they made, I know they suspended him, I don't know that they did it because someone whined.
So, you don't know that the original objection was from GLAAD because you can't pay attention to current events and come to a site like this? You are beyond redemption, you aren't making a "point" other than you simply have no capacity for fact retention. I believe it is deliberate.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollyw...-Duck-Dynasty-Patriarch-After-Call-with-GLAAD
1) I never said anything about what others were saying or doing.
2) I said that I don't think any laws were broken.
3) Thanks for finally answering...
So, you would agree then, that one can follow the law and still behave immorally, and that one can break the law and still behave morally? Correct?
I know that the assumption of Conservatives and the media was that "liberals" whined about Phil's comments. I generally do not assume such assumptions are fact until I have evidence of such, like a quote or admission by a party. I often find that such assumptions are false. That is one of the reasons I asked for a cite.
Your cite simply does not say what you claim. This is one of the things I dislike about Breitbart and Huffingtonpost, the articles are written to support an assumption that may be true, but the there is not there. A&E executives had a telephone call with GLADD, sometime the day after that call A&E took some action. Now it is implied that GLADD whined about Phil, and it may well be true, but I am not accepting that as fact until I see more than the implication that the media is making.
Be outraged as much as you want, call my personal ability to keep up with current events into question all you want. I simply want to know something like this, before I assume it to be true. I understand your desire to assume its true, based on your political identification, but I don't operate that way, so call me beyond hope or whatever.. that's your prerogative, but I tend to think that says more about you than me.
Geebus you are flat deliberately stupid. They got on the phone, protested businesses, etc. That's whinging (as the brits would say), and the reaction was to suspend him.
Anyway, it doesn't matter, you can pretend stupidity all you want, it is flat idiotic to ignore current events and then come here and pretend you are making some salient point.
Since I disagree with Phil, and everybody should have equal treatment, I should get a phone conversation with A&E immediately, and upon the end of that conversation he'd better be suspended. Any other option is clearly just too libertarian.
I find that when one cant hold up their side of the conversation they tend to resort to calling the other party stupid. If you think its stupid to question the media... Call me stupid all you want.
I find that when you (not general, you specifically) cannot hold up your end of the conversation you ask for cites, ignore them, then pretend that pointing out your deliberate ignorance of current events is somehow somebody else's fault.
The reality: I made a joke that you didn't like, you asked for a cite to "support" it, although it was a simple joke based on current events I still gave one that showed exactly what I said happened. Your answer? You went here, into fantasyland where reality meets your feelings and loses the fight to instill actual thought.
Did I ignore your cite?
Yes.
The reality: I made a joke that you didn't like, you asked for a cite to "support" it, although it was a simple joke based on current events I still gave one that showed exactly what I said happened. Your answer? You went here, into fantasyland where reality meets your feelings and loses the fight to instill actual thought.
So, you are buying the assumption that the Briebart article pushed, and calling me stupid for not doing so.
Now this Fox article comes closer to saying what you claim...
"Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil's lies about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians believe," said GLAAD rep Wilson Cruz. "He clearly knows nothing about gay people or the majority of Louisianans – and Americans - who support legal recognition for loving and committed gay and lesbian couples. Phil's decision to push vile and extreme stereotypes is a stain on A&E and his sponsors who now need to reexamine their ties to someone with such public disdain for LGBT people and families." - http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...suspended-after-comments-about-homosexuality/
"Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil's lies about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians believe," said GLAAD rep Wilson Cruz. "He clearly knows nothing about gay people or the majority of Louisianans – and Americans - who support legal recognition for loving and committed gay and lesbian couples. Phil's decision to push vile and extreme stereotypes is a stain on A&E and his sponsors who now need to reexamine their ties to someone with such public disdain for LGBT people and families." - http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...suspended-after-comments-about-homosexuality/
There was no assumption, Jarod. That was just one story about GLAAD's reaction to the original GQ article. The reality is, many on the left supported and cheered the suspension of Phil. I made a sarcastic comment based on that current event, and you've turned it into some personal nonsense.
To tell the truth, this is too much conversation about a simple sarcastic comment and it is useless to pretend your thoughts on my sarcasm matter to me.
So, I'll reiterate my previous remark and move on, I'm done with this conversation about my simple sarcasm otherwise...
I should react emotionally and try to get Phil suspended for offending me by voicing something I disagree with.
evince
Truthmatters
they defend one racist
just like they defended zimmy.
then they deny the black community has any validity when they say what the right has done is racist
OVER and OVER and OVER.
they pretend that balck people are just unreasonable for finding their racist shit racist.
the racist dont get to define what racism is
just like they defended zimmy.
then they deny the black community has any validity when they say what the right has done is racist
OVER and OVER and OVER.
they pretend that balck people are just unreasonable for finding their racist shit racist.
the racist dont get to define what racism is
I guess the Counselor is too incurious to know that GLAAD was "outraged"...but not too incurious to weigh in.
GLAAD was one of the key groups that condemned Robertson after controversial comments he made about gays and blacks in GQ magazine. The group's outrage helped prompt the suspension of Robertson by A&E.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-duck-dynasty-glaad-responds-to-phil-robertons-return-20131227,0,1182256.story#ixzz2pGMXqUbk
GLAAD was one of the key groups that condemned Robertson after controversial comments he made about gays and blacks in GQ magazine. The group's outrage helped prompt the suspension of Robertson by A&E.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-duck-dynasty-glaad-responds-to-phil-robertons-return-20131227,0,1182256.story#ixzz2pGMXqUbk
