Less Republicans believe in Evolution today than in 2009

1966stang said:
....which is actually an argument against intelligent deign....ever hear of suboptimal design? Why did the creater create eleventy billion viruses so we have to have an immune system? He must be one confused architect!
Click to expand...

in who's eye is it suboptimal.....viruses are capable of evolution and our immune systems are capable of adaptation......doesn't sound suboptimal to me.....
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
Any proof? You are absolutely full of shit, liar. I never said anything like that.
Click to expand...

lol.....you carried on about it for days....I'm sure you remember the thread, it was what 50+ pages long.....very embarrassing for you, of course, perhaps you've shut it out of your mind....in fact, that was what I thought made you decide to leave the board.....


odd, I wonder why stang is "thanking" you......since he wasn't here he has absolutely no knowledge about what actually happened.....oh, I get it now.....he's actually acting on what he ASS U ME s to be true.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....you carried on about it for days....I'm sure you remember the thread, it was what 50+ pages long.....very embarrassing for you, of course, perhaps you've shut it out of your mind....in fact, that was what I thought made you decide to leave the board.....


odd, I wonder why stang is "thanking" you......since he wasn't here he has absolutely no knowledge about what actually happened.....oh, I get it now.....he's actually acting on what he ASS U ME s to be true.....
Click to expand...

Never happened. Go ahead and link us to the posts, liar. Maybe you can salvage some dignity by showing what you misunderstood while you were being embarrassed, liar.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
You have only embarrassed yourself by showing that you have no clue what a semantic argument is or much about anything else. You are a stupid fuck who rejects science except when you are too much of coward to stand up for it.
Click to expand...

LMAO... you continue to say I reject science, yet you cannot come up with ONE example of where I reject science? Talk about being a coward.

Back up your words moron.

I am not playing with semantics. I am using words as they are defined. You want to proclaim yourself an atheist, but you define yourself as agnostic. Not sure why you are so afraid of saying you are agnostic. probably stems from your cowardice.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... you continue to say I reject science, yet you cannot come up with ONE example of where I reject science? Talk about being a coward.

Back up your words moron.

I am not playing with semantics. I am using words as they are defined. You want to proclaim yourself an atheist, but you define yourself as agnostic. Not sure why you are so afraid of saying you are agnostic. probably stems from your cowardice.
Click to expand...


You have stated the examples where you reject science. When do you support it?

You are arguing semantics and doing a very bad job of it. You failed to answer "[w]hat do you think is the difference between the absence of belief and disbelief?"

What Merriam Webster says an "atheist" believes (not really different than what I have said) has no real impact on what an atheist believes. Again, Bertrand Russell pointed out the silliness of the agnostic distinction many many years ago with his teapot example.

I ought to call myself an agnostic; but, for all practical purposes, I am an atheist. I do not think the existence of the Christian God any more probable than the existence of the Gods of Olympus or Valhalla. To take another illustration: nobody can prove that there is not between the Earth and Mars a china teapot revolving in an elliptical orbit, but nobody thinks this sufficiently likely to be taken into account in practice. I think the Christian God just as unlikely. - Bertrand Russell

I don't claim to be an agnostic because that is for conciliatory cowards and morons that don't understand where the burden of proof lies, like you.
 
Last edited:
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
You have stated the examples where you reject science. When do you support it?
Click to expand...

LMAO... I do not reject science. I have never stated that I do. So again, coward, show me an example where I reject science.

What I have done, coward, is provide you with topics on this board where science is on my side. So why do you keep asking me to do the same thing over and over again, coward?

Are you too afraid to provide and example of where I reject science?

You are arguing semantics and doing a very bad job of it. You failed to answer "[w]hat do you think is the difference between the absence of belief and disbelief?"
Click to expand...


Except, again dear little coward, I have addressed this already.

But since, dear little coward, you are so ignorant... I will do it one final time.

Disbelief: inability or refusal to accept that something is true or real

Absence of belief: Neither believing nor disbelieving

I don't claim to be an agnostic because that is for conciliatory cowards and morons that don't understand where the burden of proof lies, like you.
Click to expand...

The above highlights the typical fundamentalist response to someone who disagrees with their belief system.

Thanks for proving you are just as much a nut as a religious fundamentalist.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
why don't you go read the thread, newb.....then you wouldn't have to make a fool of yourself "thanking" the denier.....though I HAVE noticed you have a tendency to "thank" extremely foolish posts.....must be an irresistible liberal urge....
Click to expand...


What thread? Are you unfamiliar with how to search the board? I prefer to use google myself with a site:justplainpolitics.com search. Here, I will get you started.

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...stplainpolitics.com+fossils+disprove+creation

Please do let us know when you find it.
 
didn't see any reason to point it out to you since you already knew where it was......pointed it out to the Newb, though.....didn't want him to continue living in ignorance.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top