A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

His station was Benghazi. You're a liar.

Check yourself pequod, he was posted to Tripoli as ambassador in May 2012.

Here's Stevens' officials State Department bio:

"Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service. He arrived in Tripoli in May 2012 as U.S. Ambassador to Libya. Ambassador Stevens served twice previously in Libya. He served as Special Representative to the Libyan Transitional National Council from March 2011 to November 2011 during the Libyan revolution and as the Deputy Chief of Mission from 2007 to 2009.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...er_diplomat_former_peace_corps_volunteer.html
 
Check yourself pequod, he was posted to Tripoli as ambassador in May 2012.

Here's Stevens' officials State Department bio:

"Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service. He arrived in Tripoli in May 2012 as U.S. Ambassador to Libya. Ambassador Stevens served twice previously in Libya. He served as Special Representative to the Libyan Transitional National Council from March 2011 to November 2011 during the Libyan revolution and as the Deputy Chief of Mission from 2007 to 2009.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...er_diplomat_former_peace_corps_volunteer.html

Why didn't Hillary's State Department send additional security when asked repeatedly? You sick twits are filthy lying trash. It doesn't matter where he was technically stationed. This is another example of how sick you deranged cockroaches are. People were murdered and you play games. You're scum.
 
Last edited:
and the "American lives" part of that statement would require the use of..... wait for it.... wait for it..... HINDSIGHT!

Wrong again dunce; the only one's using "hind sight" are hypocrite partisan dunces like you who want to re-write the record to fit your dimwitted version of events.

The administration should have had the intelligence our allies showed by realizing the situation had deteriorated so badly they could not adequately protect their missions so they PULLED THEM OUT. Your Messiah and inept dunce Hildebeast arrogantly presumed the threats were not serious; after all, Obama, The ONE, helped the Libyans defeat Khaddafi.

Dumbass.
 
and we somehow KNEW in advance that American lives would be lost if the additional security wasn't delivered? If THAT were the case, then Stevens was derelict in putting those people in harm's way.

The fact of the matter is, lots of ambassadors request lots of stuff from the state department.... not all of those requests can or do get honored. Is that really so fucking tough for you to comprehend?

Yeah dunce; it's all Stevens fault. Moron.
 
One wonders when the Republican party will come up with ideas that are original and work for the common good of the country. As a fan of seagoing vessils, I also wonder when the Titanic will float to the surface and proceed on to New York with a smiling captain Smith at the helm.

Until then, they can always attack dems.....

What or original about Democratic policies? They've been uttering the same moronic Marxist class envy memes since Roosevelt.

They argued for a War on Poverty back in LBJs day. Dunces like you argue for a "jobs" bill that is a $450 billion pile of pork claiming that this time the unfunded spending, half of the previous pork laden $850 billion, will do what $850 billion could not.

You dunces don't have any new ideas; it's more of the same moronic memes and re-distribution schemes that never succeeded in lifting anyone out of poverty or created a single additional job but rather, are intended to dupe low information dunces into voting for morally corrupt politicians promising the dunces something for nothing.

Moron.
 
Check yourself pequod, he was posted to Tripoli as ambassador in May 2012.

Here's Stevens' officials State Department bio:

"Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service. He arrived in Tripoli in May 2012 as U.S. Ambassador to Libya. Ambassador Stevens served twice previously in Libya. He served as Special Representative to the Libyan Transitional National Council from March 2011 to November 2011 during the Libyan revolution and as the Deputy Chief of Mission from 2007 to 2009.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...er_diplomat_former_peace_corps_volunteer.html

Well there you go; that makes this Administrations gross incompetence and malfeasance okay then...glad you cleared that up.

Dunce.
 
Why didn't Hillary's State Department send additional security when asked repeatedly? You sick twits are filthy lying trash. It doesn't matter where he was technically stationed. This is another example of how sick you deranged cockroaches are. People were murdered and you play games. You're scum.

Uh-huh, I get it. Y O U called someone a liar about where Stevens was posted and when your error was pointed out, you got all ugly and said it doesn't really matter. Followed by the usual string of invective.

Seek help. Obviously your medical MJ isn't doing enough for you.
 
Uh-huh, I get it. Y O U called someone a liar about where Stevens was posted and when your error was pointed out, you got all ugly and said it doesn't really matter. Followed by the usual string of invective.

Seek help. Obviously your medical MJ isn't doing enough for you.

Right, it doesn't matter. What matters is four Americans are dead and Hillary and Obama are responsible. That's what matters, and that's why you can't face it and defend the sick scum.
 
Uh-huh, I get it. Y O U called someone a liar about where Stevens was posted and when your error was pointed out, you got all ugly and said it doesn't really matter. Followed by the usual string of invective.

Seek help. Obviously your medical MJ isn't doing enough for you.

He wasn't wrong dunce; Stevens was definately working in Benghazi and NOT Tripoli when he was murdered thanks to the gross negligence and incompetence of Hilary and Obama who then tried to claim it was a spontaneous protest.

Your dishonest and moronic efforts to deflect the topic away from the facts have been noted.
 
He wasn't wrong dunce; Stevens was definately working in Benghazi and NOT Tripoli when he was murdered thanks to the gross negligence and incompetence of Hilary and Obama who then tried to claim it was a spontaneous protest.

Your dishonest and moronic efforts to deflect the topic away from the facts have been noted.

He was posted to Tripoli as ambassador and traveled to Benghazi and other cities from time to time. Those are the facts, shit-for-brains. You can ignore pequod's comment that Stevens was "stationed in Benghazi" in favor of rewriting history, in fact, I count on you to ignore it.

You are that repugnant and that deceitful.
 
Why didn't Hillary's State Department send additional security when asked repeatedly? You sick twits are filthy lying trash. It doesn't matter where he was technically stationed. This is another example of how sick you deranged cockroaches are. People were murdered and you play games. You're scum.
nice tap dance... Because it DOES matter where the Ambassador is stationed.

Again... You all can try - and you HAVE been trying - to make Benghazi out to be this terrible example of malfeasance by the Obama administration. The American people never bought it. You remind me of stupid gringos here in Mexico who try to speak English to locals, and when it becomes obvious that they are not being understood, instead of pulling out a spanish-english dictionary, they simply repeat their question in English, BUT THEY JUST SAY IT SLOWER AND LOUDER thinking that will make them understood. It still won't sell, no matter how loudly you yell at everyone. It will just get more pathetic with each passing week/month/year... Kinda like birthers.
 
The deliberate deception by these bottom feeders is amazing. They really have no moral compass. Just astounding.

Take it up with your scum-sucking pals Issa and Chaffetz. Why did they vote to cut funding?

"... I wrote a piece earlier this week about the political gain being sought from the deaths of Stevens and three other Americans in Benghazi, a number of diplomatic acquaintances of mine emailed to say I should have looked at the State Department's security budget. Two of them had unprintable things to say about Congress. Who can be blamed for that? Well, Chaffetz and Issa among others...

"...Since retaking control in 2010, House Republicans have aggressively cut spending at the State Department in general and embassy security in particular. Chaffetz and Issa and their colleagues voted to pay for far less security than the State Department requested in 2011 and again this year...

Is that responsible for the tragedy in Benghazi? Probably not, at least not entirely. Usually when security goes wrong, it's down to a cascade of small failures piling up. But it's a bit rich to complain about a lack of US security personnel at diplomatic missions on the one hand, while actively working to cut the budget to pay for US security personnel at diplomatic missions on the other..."

"...We've got something like 260 embassies and consulates around the world, and there's a remarkable number of them that aren't anywhere close to Inman standards and are still particularly dangerous," says Lilly. "Inman standards" refers to the report written by Admiral Bobby Ray Inman on US building security abroad after the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Beirut that left 241 US troops and 58 French soldiers dead..."

"...I suggested to Lilly that if there weren't enough trained personnel for diplomatic protection in Libya, then maybe Stevens should have reined his operation in and done a lot less. Basically bow to the limitations.

He pushed back on that idea: "If the foreign service took that attitude, a hell of a lot less would get done. They know they're taking risks just by living in these places. They're pretty adventuresome and they've got to get out and do the job," he says. "Benghazi is a critical point in creating a stable environment in Libya, and Stevens knew he had to get out and work it."


http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Secu...blame-voted-to-cut-diplomatic-security-budget
 
He wasn't wrong dunce; Stevens was definately working in Benghazi and NOT Tripoli when he was murdered thanks to the gross negligence and incompetence of Hilary and Obama who then tried to claim it was a spontaneous protest.

Your dishonest and moronic efforts to deflect the topic away from the facts have been noted.
Where an Ambassador is POSTED is the Secretary of State's business and is, in nearly every case, the capital of the country. Where he choses to visit within that country is HIS business. Do you honestly think that the Secretary of State micromanages the daily itineraries of 130+ Ambassadors?
 
He was posted to Tripoli as ambassador and traveled to Benghazi and other cities from time to time. Those are the facts, shit-for-brains. You can ignore pequod's comment that Stevens was "stationed in Benghazi" in favor of rewriting history, in fact, I count on you to ignore it.

You are that repugnant and that deceitful.

Dear dunce; he was stationed in Benghazi when he was murdered thanks to the gross negligence and incompetence of this administration you so moronically try to defend.

But your dimwitted efforts to obfuscate and debpny the truth and the facts have been noted. How ironic you think others have shot-for-brains when you make such utterly stupid dishonest claims and arguments.

You're nothing more than a repugnant, dishonest hyper partisan stuck permanently on stupid.

Carry on dunce.
 
Take it up with your scum-sucking pals Issa and Chaffetz. Why did they vote to cut funding?

"... I wrote a piece earlier this week about the political gain being sought from the deaths of Stevens and three other Americans in Benghazi, a number of diplomatic acquaintances of mine emailed to say I should have looked at the State Department's security budget. Two of them had unprintable things to say about Congress. Who can be blamed for that? Well, Chaffetz and Issa among others...

"...Since retaking control in 2010, House Republicans have aggressively cut spending at the State Department in general and embassy security in particular. Chaffetz and Issa and their colleagues voted to pay for far less security than the State Department requested in 2011 and again this year...

Is that responsible for the tragedy in Benghazi? Probably not, at least not entirely. Usually when security goes wrong, it's down to a cascade of small failures piling up. But it's a bit rich to complain about a lack of US security personnel at diplomatic missions on the one hand, while actively working to cut the budget to pay for US security personnel at diplomatic missions on the other..."

"...We've got something like 260 embassies and consulates around the world, and there's a remarkable number of them that aren't anywhere close to Inman standards and are still particularly dangerous," says Lilly. "Inman standards" refers to the report written by Admiral Bobby Ray Inman on US building security abroad after the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Beirut that left 241 US troops and 58 French soldiers dead..."

"...I suggested to Lilly that if there weren't enough trained personnel for diplomatic protection in Libya, then maybe Stevens should have reined his operation in and done a lot less. Basically bow to the limitations.

He pushed back on that idea: "If the foreign service took that attitude, a hell of a lot less would get done. They know they're taking risks just by living in these places. They're pretty adventuresome and they've got to get out and do the job," he says. "Benghazi is a critical point in creating a stable environment in Libya, and Stevens knew he had to get out and work it."


http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Secu...blame-voted-to-cut-diplomatic-security-budget

Another dishonest claim by the forums dishonest dunces; it wasn't about a budget cut, it was about gross negligence and incompetence, then trying to cover it up by claiming the event was a spontaneous protest.

Everyone BUT this administration knew the dangers in Benghazi and our allies had already pulled out their missions.

What part of reality do you dishonest repugnant partisan dunces continue to not get?
 
Dear dunce; he was stationed in Benghazi when he was murdered thanks to the gross negligence and incompetence of this administration you so moronically try to defend.

But your dimwitted efforts to obfuscate and debpny the truth and the facts have been noted. How ironic you think others have shot-for-brains when you make such utterly stupid dishonest claims and arguments.

You're nothing more than a repugnant, dishonest hyper partisan stuck permanently on stupid.

Carry on dunce.
You are wrong. Stevens was in Benghazi of his own volition... Not by orders from the Secretary of State.
 
Where an Ambassador is POSTED is the Secretary of State's business and is, in nearly every case, the capital of the country. Where he choses to visit within that country is HIS business. Do you honestly think that the Secretary of State micromanages the daily itineraries of 130+ Ambassadors?

So Stevens was merely visiting Benghazi now according to you dunce? Your story changes faster than a chameleon.

Let's be honest here; you're a dishonest hyper partisan low information dimwit who parrots the moronic talking points of this administration like a trained circus monkey. You wouldn't know a fact if it walked up and slapped on your empty retard head.

What I know is that Stevens was indeed assigned to Benghazi for secret reasons we still do not know, and that he sued numerous requests and concerns for security. His last entry in his diary suggests deep concerns.

What I also know is that after the murder of four Americans, this administration lied about the events for two weeks during an election year.

What I also know is that the perpetrators are still running free, and this administration has refused to cooperate with Congress and does everything it can to deny access to information and events.

What I also know is that events were deteriorating so badly that ALL of our allies had already removed their personnel knowing they could not adequately protect their missions; but not the incompetent morons in the State Department and White House.

Those are the OBVIOUS facts; unless, of course, you are a dishonest hyper partisan dunce.
 
Back
Top