Good News

There you go, have fun.

washboard.jpg

Ahhh, Its the homoerotic tommy! pee wee herman indeed!
 
You mean the one that was a Pulitzer Prize finalist?

It only "sounds like" that to you because you're a demented knee-jerk liberal. As I've said several times already, the book also discusses the abuse of slaves. ILA is right.... anything that doesn't paint the subject in a complete all-good and all-bad manner is completely unacceptable to liberals, no matter how well researched and well-accepted it is by the academic community.

I've read quite a bit on the subject, including the self-hating southern liberal bible "The Mind of the South", written by a mentally ill liberal who wound up taking his own life; W.J. Cash.

Something that I've already pointed out. Actually you should know that Dantes is really two people with Darla taking the East Coast shift and Prakosh taking the West Coast. Anything at this time is Prakosh. I remeber SJJ saying this and not believing him when he said there were two different writing styles, but he is right though.
 
Yeah, they also had cotton. What's your point?

None of that means it was legal there for men to run around raping whomever they pleased for 400 years.

White men were never convicted of rape because rape was punishable by the death penalty. And no white man was executed for rape in the South, so even by the 1970s when they were being charged with rape and they were being convicted of rape they were simply given the "mercy clause" by the jury and their sentencing was left up to the judge. Rape was basically for black men and white women, since no one cared if a black man or a white man raped a black woman. And the penalty for rape was death. What part of this is so hard for you to understand? Crack a book, dude and learn something. So far all you have shown is how stupid you are.
 
Your other colonies...

Slaving trading was banned in 1807 and was enforced by the Royal Navy, in fact there were many occasions where slaves were thrown overboard by slavers to avoid being captured red handed. Of course the US had so many slaves, over 4 million, that they didn't need any more from Africa. I should also point out that US traders were still carrying on the slave trade to Cuba and Brazil up until the 1860s. Slavery itself was not abolished in Cuba until 1886.
 
Last edited:
Wow! You sure told *ME*. :rolleyes:

This is an intriguing side note is this where you got the idea for your list of books, mister book cracker, or is it just mister cracker?

From Amazon's site about 10 minutes ago:

Frequently Bought Together Price for both: $33.85

Show availability and shipping details

Buy the selected items together

This item: Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South by Bertram Wyatt-Brown Paperback $19.56

The Mind of the South by W.J. Cash Paperback $14.29

Coincidence or confluence or just plain serendipity! You make the call. I can't believe it myself. It must just be one of those uncanny freaky things that happen now and again!
 
White men were never convicted of rape because rape was punishable by the death penalty. And no white man was executed for rape in the South, so even by the 1970s when they were being charged with rape and they were being convicted of rape they were simply given the "mercy clause" by the jury and their sentencing was left up to the judge. Rape was basically for black men and white women, since no one cared if a black man or a white man raped a black woman. And the penalty for rape was death. What part of this is so hard for you to understand? Crack a book, dude and learn something. So far all you have shown is how stupid you are.

And if a white man raped a white woman, you're saying there was "no harm, no foul", and everyone just went home?

Really, are you this dumb?
 
Something that I've already pointed out. Actually you should know that Dantes is really two people with Darla taking the East Coast shift and Prakosh taking the West Coast. Anything at this time is Prakosh. I remeber SJJ saying this and not believing him when he said there were two different writing styles, but he is right though.

You're a real detective and taking the word of SJJ on anything is pure lunacy. Best stick to your icepuppet persona and keep getting emails from your rat-raising research assistant hillbilly goat farmer telling you every move to make. Because when it comes to detection, Sherlock Holmes you're not!
 
This is an intriguing side note is this where you got the idea for your list of books, mister book cracker, or is it just mister cracker?

From Amazon's site about 10 minutes ago:

Frequently Bought Together Price for both: $33.85

Show availability and shipping details

Buy the selected items together

This item: Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South by Bertram Wyatt-Brown Paperback $19.56

The Mind of the South by W.J. Cash Paperback $14.29

Coincidence or confluence or just plain serendipity! You make the call. I can't believe it myself. It must just be one of those uncanny freaky things that happen now and again!

If you knew the subject, you'd know they're probably the two most frequently used books on the subject in college history courses.

Nor is "Southern Honor" necessarily a "Conservative" book, despite what those on this forum are attempting to spin it as. It is recognized as historically valid by academics.
 
And if a white man raped a white woman, you're saying there was "no harm, no foul", and everyone just went home?

Really, are you this dumb?

The court records speak for themselves, all you have is disbelief! The book you keep trumpeting here says that the greatest punishment was social ostracism. Maybe that's how they handled the rape of white women by white men or maybe they always just blamed it on a black man or maybe it didn't matter because white women had no rights. I see you haven't even bothered to read the essay I posted or you wouldn't be saying this stupid shit here! Crack a book you can't even read a short essay!
 
The court records speak for themselves, all you have is disbelief! The book you keep trumpeting here says that the greatest punishment was social ostracism. Maybe that's how they handled the rape of white women by white men or maybe they always just blamed it on a black man or maybe it didn't matter because white women had no rights. I see you haven't even bothered to read the essay I posted or you wouldn't be saying this stupid shit here! Crack a book you can't even read a short essay!

So where are these court records of yours that say no white man was ever convicted of rape for 400 years in the south?

"Maybe"? If Ashley Wilkes raped Scarlett O'Hara, you seriously think old Gerald O'Hara would have been satisfied with "social ostracizing"?

Your essay is about slavery, which does not refer to no southern man being convicted of rape for 400 years.
 
You're a real detective and taking the word of SJJ on anything is pure lunacy. Best stick to your icepuppet persona and keep getting emails from your rat-raising research assistant hillbilly goat farmer telling you every move to make. Because when it comes to detection, Sherlock Holmes you're not!


But here, the claim could be easily disproved by the mods. And I'd ask them to do it, except that it makes no difference. Tom constantly makes wild claims. When disproved, he either has a buttboy erase the thread (if it's one he started), and if it's on someone else's thread he simply continues on to his next wild claim as if nothing had ever happened.


He's a shameless old gossiping woman. At this point, I highly doubt anyone pays any attention to his latest wild claim, and if there is anyone who does; they're stupid.
 
But here, the claim could be easily disproved by the mods. And I'd ask them to do it, except that it makes no difference. Tom constantly makes wild claims. When disproved, he either has a buttboy erase the thread (if it's one he started), and if it's on someone else's thread he simply continues on to his next wild claim as if nothing had ever happened.


He's a shameless old gossiping woman. At this point, I highly doubt anyone pays any attention to his latest wild claim, and if there is anyone who does; they're stupid.

I was actually hoping you would jump in on this, thanks for your input!
 
If you knew the subject, you'd know they're probably the two most frequently used books on the subject in college history courses.

Nor is "Southern Honor" necessarily a "Conservative" book, despite what those on this forum are attempting to spin it as. It is recognized as historically valid by academics.


Dantes if only you knew the subject you'd know what they teach in college history courses about it. WHy don't you try taking a course on it Dantes huh?
 
I was actually hoping you would jump in on this, thanks for your input!

The mods can tell if I ever posted under your name, we live in two different states. Tom got so excited he forgot himself and thought he was still on aol where he could make wild claim after wild claim and be taken seriously by dupes. STupid Old lady.
 
If you knew the subject, you'd know they're probably the two most frequently used books on the subject in college history courses.

Nor is "Southern Honor" necessarily a "Conservative" book, despite what those on this forum are attempting to spin it as. It is recognized as historically valid by academics.

I bought that same book from a UK second hand book seller called Abe books and it is listed as a former library book, don't listen to Prakosh/Dantes anymore than Darla/Dantes.

Item Status: Confirmed
Title: Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old Sou
Author: Bertram Wyatt-Brown
Quantity: 1
Book Description: Ships from the UK. Former Library book. Shows some signs of wear, and may have some markings on the inside.

Book Price: £ 0.63
Postage Price: £ 2.75
 
I sometimes wonder what planet you people reside on. I know it's not earth. Here on planet earth this still happens.

So, give me some data....

Where does it say that white men were not convicted of rape for 400 years in the south?
 
So where are these court records of yours that say no white man was ever convicted of rape for 400 years in the south?

"Maybe"? If Ashley Wilkes raped Scarlett O'Hara, you seriously think old Gerald O'Hara would have been satisfied with "social ostracizing"?

Your essay is about slavery, which does not refer to no southern man being convicted of rape for 400 years.

I guess you can't think too well can you? I'll let you think about that for a while and then I'll get back to you if after 4-6 hours you haven't figured out what is wrong with your stupid question by then,

I think I've already shown that you may have read this one book but haven't read much else. And that was clear when you said that Cash's Mind of the South was about slavery; it isn't! Personally, I don't think you have much knowledge about much of anything.
 
Back
Top