The Hildebeast says Benghazi is her greatest regret

Don't forget that Reagan was in power and he could do no wrong.

The Teflon president.

60b2a9f8dade3ae31554e623c4888483.jpg
 
The Teflon president.

Coming from someone who supported Slick Willy and his philandering and Obama who is blameless for just about anything happening, suggests a profound irony.

You hypocrites just can't help yourselves. But Reagan was a beloved leader unlike the current butt c
Own who can't lead his way out of a coat closet.
 
Over a year ago the outraged Liar and Cheif promised to find the perpetrators, subsequently called terrorists after Conservatives proved the "film outrage" was a lie, and bring these murderers to justice. So far, the only person to see justice is the American filmmaker blamed for the event by this administration. we know who the leader was; he's still free and the filmmaker still incarcerated.

And this "filmmaker" wouldn't even be in prison without the scrutiny they believe was necessary to promote their lie. They spent weeks trying to cover that turd in the sandbox.
 
I'm not a mind reader so I just hope you don't really mean that someone who committed crimes shouldn't pay for what he did. Movie or no movie, he deserved to be in jail. He has a lengthy rap sheet. Do you think Al Capone shouldn't have been jailed for tax evasion, too?

He was already paying for that and was on parole. The "parole violation" that sent him back had nothing to do with that rap sheet and everything to do with the President's office wanting a scapegoat to distract from Benghazi. When it didn't work they had already passed the point of no return with this guy.

If you believe that stupid video would have even been watched by more than this guy's mom before disappearing into youtube obscurity without the President giving everybody reason to view it then you are seriously the perfect silo for all the propaganda anybody wants to put in it... anything they want to say, so long as you think it comes from "your side" will be swallowed whole and without regard to nourishment.
 
And this "filmmaker" wouldn't even be in prison without the scrutiny they believe was necessary to promote their lie. They spent weeks trying to cover that turd in the sandbox.


The reality, Damo, is that there isn't much question at all that the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo were in part in reaction to the film. The idea that a person who violates the terms of their parole leading to violent demonstrations based in part on the parole violation would not have his parole revoked is . . . interesting.
 
And this "filmmaker" wouldn't even be in prison without the scrutiny they believe was necessary to promote their lie. They spent weeks trying to cover that turd in the sandbox.

Seriously? He would not be in prison had he not committed crimes.
 
He was already paying for that and was on parole. The "parole violation" that sent him back had nothing to do with that rap sheet and everything to do with the President's office wanting a scapegoat to distract from Benghazi. When it didn't work they had already passed the point of no return with this guy.

If you believe that stupid video would have even been watched by more than this guy's mom before disappearing into youtube obscurity without the President giving everybody reason to view it then you are seriously the perfect silo for all the propaganda anybody wants to put in it... anything they want to say, so long as you think it comes from "your side" will be swallowed whole and without regard to nourishment.

If you break parole you go to jail. There were plenty of people who saw the video and were upset by it, that's not so say that Benghazi was caused by the video, but you are naïve about who saw the video, or ignorant, or lying. Lying on one side, is just as bad as lying on the other.
 
The reality, Damo, is that there isn't much question at all that the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo were in part in reaction to the film. The idea that a person who violates the terms of their parole leading to violent demonstrations based in part on the parole violation would not have his parole revoked is . . . interesting.

Damocles's has a jersey of a different color so he has to go full board on the other side. He does not want to know the truth, he wants to argue his side.
 
Coming from someone who supported Slick Willy and his philandering and Obama who is blameless for just about anything happening, suggests a profound irony.

You hypocrites just can't help yourselves. But Reagan was a beloved leader unlike the current butt c
Own who can't lead his way out of a coat closet.

Newsflash, dunderhead. Clinton had a higher approval rating than raygun after leaving office. And today it's even higher, Gallup says close to 70%.

Ronald Reagan January 1981-January 1989 52.8%

Bill Clinton January 1993-January 2001 55.1%
 
13 Benghazis Happened Under President Bush and Fox News Said Nothing

http://www.policymic.com/articles/4...nder-president-bush-and-fox-news-said-nothing

Wise up kid

So you think those incidents are similar? How many of the 13 involved an embassy being over run?

1) Security forces took losses, but repelled the attack
2) A car bomb went off outside the embassy... a lot of people injured, 12 civilians outside were killed. Security again was not breached.
3) Bomb thrown at Embassy... no injuries or fatalities at the embassy... security again was not breached.
4) Two gunmen attack again in Pakistan... again they were repelled... security again was not breached.
5) This one was not an attack on the embassy, but rather on a housing complex where Americans and other westerners lived... again... security of an embassy not breached

6) two security guards died in this bombing... again... security was not breached
7) This is the closest so far as gunmen did breach security and many local workers in the embassy were killed.
8) This attack did kill David Foy and several others... but again it was not a security breach at the Embassy or consulate. It occurred outside the facility.
9) Syrian security forces repelled the attack... security yet again not breached
10) LMAO... someone fired a grenade into an empty building. Not even close.
11) A Mortar attack... 19 dead... security forces killed six attackers and repelled the rest... security was not breached.
12) Drive by shooting, three of four attackers killed, security was not breached
13) Again an attack in Yemen... grounds were not breached

So no... it is you that needs to stop listening to propaganda and it is you that should wise up.
 
13 Benghazis Happened Under President Bush and Fox News Said Nothing

http://www.policymic.com/articles/4...nder-president-bush-and-fox-news-said-nothing

Wise up kid

The incidents below include all kinds of attacks — gunmen on bikes, suicide bombs, car bombs, gunmen shooting outside, and terrorists storming Consulate compounds similar to what happened in Benghazi.

Strawman bullshit....over and over....trying to equate equivalence where none exists, it's just something you pinheads can't stop yourself from doing.

and in the examples cited, the only similarity is that they are terrorists attacks....Benghazi is much more that that.
 
So you think those incidents are similar? How many of the 13 involved an embassy being over run?

1) Security forces took losses, but repelled the attack
2) A car bomb went off outside the embassy... a lot of people injured, 12 civilians outside were killed. Security again was not breached.
3) Bomb thrown at Embassy... no injuries or fatalities at the embassy... security again was not breached.
4) Two gunmen attack again in Pakistan... again they were repelled... security again was not breached.
5) This one was not an attack on the embassy, but rather on a housing complex where Americans and other westerners lived... again... security of an embassy not breached

6) two security guards died in this bombing... again... security was not breached
7) This is the closest so far as gunmen did breach security and many local workers in the embassy were killed.
8) This attack did kill David Foy and several others... but again it was not a security breach at the Embassy or consulate. It occurred outside the facility.
9) Syrian security forces repelled the attack... security yet again not breached
10) LMAO... someone fired a grenade into an empty building. Not even close.
11) A Mortar attack... 19 dead... security forces killed six attackers and repelled the rest... security was not breached.
12) Drive by shooting, three of four attackers killed, security was not breached
13) Again an attack in Yemen... grounds were not breached

So no... it is you that needs to stop listening to propaganda and it is you that should wise up.


You really are an idiot, it was not an embassy that was attacked in Benghazi.
 
Newsflash, dunderhead. Clinton had a higher approval rating than raygun after leaving office. And today it's even higher, Gallup says close to 70%.

Ronald Reagan January 1981-January 1989 52.8%

Bill Clinton January 1993-January 2001 55.1%

You women really rallied for Billy.....an obvious display of intense jealousy of Monica....but alas, you all can't be Monica...LOL
 
So you think those incidents are similar? How many of the 13 involved an embassy being over run?

1) Security forces took losses, but repelled the attack
2) A car bomb went off outside the embassy... a lot of people injured, 12 civilians outside were killed. Security again was not breached.
3) Bomb thrown at Embassy... no injuries or fatalities at the embassy... security again was not breached.
4) Two gunmen attack again in Pakistan... again they were repelled... security again was not breached.
5) This one was not an attack on the embassy, but rather on a housing complex where Americans and other westerners lived... again... security of an embassy not breached

6) two security guards died in this bombing... again... security was not breached
7) This is the closest so far as gunmen did breach security and many local workers in the embassy were killed.
8) This attack did kill David Foy and several others... but again it was not a security breach at the Embassy or consulate. It occurred outside the facility.
9) Syrian security forces repelled the attack... security yet again not breached
10) LMAO... someone fired a grenade into an empty building. Not even close.
11) A Mortar attack... 19 dead... security forces killed six attackers and repelled the rest... security was not breached.
12) Drive by shooting, three of four attackers killed, security was not breached
13) Again an attack in Yemen... grounds were not breached

So no... it is you that needs to stop listening to propaganda and it is you that should wise up.

Security couldn't have been too great if all these attacks and deaths occurred anyway.
 
You really are an idiot, it was not an embassy that was attacked in Benghazi.


Why didn't you mention that to your comrade Anti-Party, he posted the link that gave all the strawman examples..???? Talk about being an idiot.
 
You women really rallied for Billy.....an obvious display of intense jealousy of Monica....but alas, you all can't be Monica...LOL

OIC. We all had crushes on Bill that had nothing to do with the platform he was running on. :rolleyes:

Explains the conservative men's lust for Palin, I guess.
 
Back
Top