Sexuality is not black or white. . .

I might have had an earlier awakening if my kindergarten teacher hadn't been in her 60s.......what I remember best about kindergarten was learning how to lie......

we had this chart and each kid had a toy plastic truck and if you slept during nap time you got to advance your truck one space.....when you got to the finish line you got to take the truck home.....I finally learned how to look my teacher in the eye and say "yes, I fell asleep".......I don't know if she believed me, but I got my truck.....fortunately I learned that if I laid my mat down in the corner I could hear the first/second graders having story time if I put my head next to the cold air return.....that way I could spend the whole time not fidgeting.....
Why, you little goal oriented capitalist!
 
That is not the nonsense. The nonsense is your pretending a gay man could not be aroused enough to get a woman pregnant. At the height of homophobia, many men (and women) were in fake 'normal' relationships because they did not want to be ostracized. They wanted to 'fit in'.


So, a gay man could get an erection with a woman, but you could not with a man?
 
Like almost all things in our world. . . .

Sexuality is not black or white. One is generally not gay or straight. .
I knew a dude like this. No scruples or moral code whatsoever. Male, female, he didn't care. He would make advances to a goldfish. Horniest dude I ever met. He was a wire fox terrier named Duke.
 
I knew a dude like this. No scruples or moral code whatsoever. Male, female, he didn't care. He would make advances to a goldfish. Horniest dude I ever met. He was a wire fox terrier named Duke.

Apparently he was reincarnated as a South Florida personal injury attorney.
 
I knew a dude like this. No scruples or moral code whatsoever. Male, female, he didn't care. He would make advances to a goldfish. Horniest dude I ever met. He was a wire fox terrier named Duke.

What do morals have to do with what your attracted to.
 
I understand and get your argument, I don't agree. It is however a very different argument than Post Modern or Supercandy were making.

What is the point I am making Garud? Show us that you understand it.

It's not your point I understand.

If you do not understand my point, then how can you say the bolded from the first post quoted above? You said his argument was different than the one I was making, how can you say that if you don't even understand the argument I am making?

More ignorance from you Garud?
 
Like almost all things in our world. . . .

Sexuality is not black or white. One is generally not gay or straight. Often people resist this idea because physical attraction to the same sex is such a taboo, and it my contention that many people automatically repress any such feelings.

Sexual identification is more like most everything, on a scale. People generally fit on a spectrum of sexual attraction. There are some who are truly on one side of the scale... purely and totally heterosexual, while there are few on the other side truly and totally homosexual. Most fall somewhere in between. Most people will not admit to anything but being on an extreme, even to themselves.
What a crock of homo propaganda. You idiots need a royal ass reaming from your beloved IRS.
 
What do morals have to do with what your attracted to.

That's my point. Apparently with the left, morality is only important when discussing profit, " income inequality" and guns. But when it comes to sexuality, you guys are no more sophisticated than a wire fox terrier named Duke.
 
That's my point. Apparently with the left, morality is only important when discussing profit, " income inequality" and guns. But when it comes to sexuality, you guys are no more sophisticated than a wire fox terrier named Duke.

What you are attracted to is nature, what you do about it is morality.
 
he doesn't actually want you to answer, SF........he just wants you to say you're as hot for the guys as he is.....

No, what he wants is to try and justify the ignorance of his OP.

If physically stimulated, arousal will occur. He wants to pretend that means people are not either gay or straight but 'somewhere in between'.
 
No, what he wants is to try and justify the ignorance of his OP.

If physically stimulated, arousal will occur. He wants to pretend that means people are not either gay or straight but 'somewhere in between'.

Not according to PostModern, only a woman can get him aroused.
 
Back
Top