Dunn trial begins in Florida

[Big Money]

flabby white guy

Irony abounds.

 

[Jarod]

Irony abounds.

What makes you think I am flabby or white?

 

[zappasguitar]

Too dumb or lazy to look it up for yourself shit-for-brains?

Here; let me help you:

Dunn, dressed in a white shirt, green sweater and tie, said the music from a red Dodge Durango parked at the same gas station grew "really loud" after his fiancée went into the store.

"My review mirror was shaking, my eardrums were vibrating. It was ridiculously loud," Dunn said.

"I said, 'Can you turn that down please?'" he testified. "They turned it off. I said thank you."

But Dunn said the young men in the Durango soon began using expletives and then turned the volume back up.

"I was in fear for my life, but I wasn't to the point where I was ready to use deadly force. I was just going, 'Oh my God, where is all this hostility coming from?'" Dunn said.

Dunn said he opened fire only after seeing what looked like the barrel of a gun or a lead pipe through the Durango's back passenger window and Davis was about to get out of the car.

"As his (Davis's) head clears the window frame, he said ‘this shit's going down now,'" Dunn testified.

Not racial?

Because Dunn is white and Davis was black, some observers see similar parallels in the case to the fatal confrontation between Floridians George Zimmerman and black teen Trayvon Martin.

Those aren't my words, those are right from the news media.

What did the punks in the car testify?

Davis and his friends had been "girl shopping" at St. Johns Town Center mall before stopping at the gas station to buy gum and cigarettes Stornes, now 20, said the Durango was equipped with an amplifier and two 12-inch speakers, and they were listening to loud bass-thumping rap music.

Thompson, 18, testified that Dunn parked his Volkswagen Jetta close to the SUV. That's when Dunn said, "Turn your music down. I can't hear myself think." Thompson turned down the volume -- but Davis said, "(Expletive) that. Turn the music back up." So Thompson did.

Thompson said the verbal exchange continued, and Davis told Dunn, "(Expletive) you." Thompson said Dunn asked Jordan, "Are you talking to me?" reached for a gun and fired at Davis' door.

Brunson, 18, a backseat passenger, tried to pull Davis down to take cover. Afterward, Brunson called Davis' name and he didn't respond, so he checked his body to see if he had been shot. "When I reached and touched him, blood appeared on my fingers," Brunson said.

Now like I said, here is Jarod's version:

So, this guy shot and killed a 17 year old who was unarmed and inside a car, went home and ordered a pizza and did not call the police before being arrested the next day, and you don't know if he was ligit in his right to kill the kid or not?

That is a very one sided simplistic claim while suggesting that this is enough information for me to judge this guy.

That is absurd, painfuylly stupid and for you to even think that Jarod has a coherent argument with such simplistic one sided views illustrates that you are just as painfully stupid as he is.

Moron.

The ONLY difference between your "version" of events and Jarod's is YOU left out the part where the defendant went to his hotel, ORDERED AND ATE A PIZZA, then phoned for the police.

It was Y-O-U who left out some pertinent details.

 

[Big Money]

Was segregation just?

Democrats thought so, didn't they, Counselor?

 

[Big Money]

What makes you think I am flabby or white?

Do you deny it?

 

[Jarod]

Democrats thought so, didn't they, Counselor?

Some did.

 

[Truth Detector]

What does the media have to do with this?

Where do you think you are getting your information dunce?

Also... I can have an opinion about what the jury should do and about what the law should be. Sorry, you feel you cant have an opinion other than to trust the jury. Sometimes juries get it wrong, sometimes laws are unfair.

You can have all the OPINIONS you want; I prefer the law and Constitutional requirement within the law that says that one is NOT guilty until proven guilty by a jury of his peers.

I am amused you have such a high OPINION of your OPINION when you have seldom been right about anything.

This isn’t about your OPINION; it is about JUSTICE whether you agree with it or not. You mentioned OJ Simpson; he was found NOT guilty. It doesn’t matter what you or I thought. He was a free man and that is how the law works.

Prosecuting people in the court of public opinion is not justice; it is an injustice and journalistic malfeasance.

When you start believing that the law is irrelevant because you feel your OPINION trumps the law, then we head towards anarchy.

 

[Jarod]

Where do you think you are getting your information dunce?



You can have all the OPINIONS you want; I prefer the law and Constitutional requirement within the law that says that one is NOT guilty until proven guilty by a jury of his peers.

I am amused you have such a high OPINION of your OPINION when you have seldom been right about anything.

This isn’t about your OPINION; it is about JUSTICE whether you agree with it or not. You mentioned OJ Simpson; he was found NOT guilty. It doesn’t matter what you or I thought. He was a free man and that is how the law works.

Prosecuting people in the court of public opinion is not justice; it is an injustice and journalistic malfeasance.

When you start believing that the law is irrelevant because you feel your OPINION trumps the law, then we head towards anarchy.

I was getting my info from the live feed from the courtroom.

 

[zappasguitar]

NO, I don't agree with that opinion.

Are you saying that you believe that the OJ Simpson verdict was justice.

One of the absolute best parts of reading these threads is watching dimbulb USF go off one one of his thick-headed tangents where he engages in grammatical gymnastics.

He obfuscates.

He lies.

He cherry picks.

He assumes.

But not so the facts of the issue become clear by the end of the day, but ALL just so he can belittle other posters.

 

[Truth Detector]

The ONLY difference between your "version" of events and Jarod's is YOU left out the part where the defendant went to his hotel, ORDERED AND ATE A PIZZA, then phoned for the police.

It was Y-O-U who left out some pertinent details.

Dear dumbass; it is irrelevant what happened AFTER the shooting. But you're a moonbat moron of epic proportions, how can anyone expect you to have a cogent thought, let alone think at all.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

NO, I don't agree with that opinion.

Are you saying that you believe that the OJ Simpson verdict was justice.

But that is pretty much what you've been promoting; because of your consistency of first voicing your desire for "justice" and then showing that you really want vengeance.

 

[Truth Detector]

One of the absolute best parts of reading these threads is watching dimbulb USF go off one one of his thick-headed tangents where he engages in grammatical gymnastics.

He obfuscates.

He lies.

He cherry picks.

He assumes.

But not so the facts of the issue become clear by the end of the day, but ALL just so he can belittle other posters.

LMAO; you're too stupid for words dunce.

 

[Truth Detector]

I was getting my info from the live feed from the courtroom.

LMAO

 

[Jarod]

Dear dumbass; it is irrelevant what happened AFTER the shooting. But you're a moonbat moron of epic proportions, how can anyone expect you to have a cogent thought, let alone think at all.

Funny, the judge did not seem to think it was irrelevant... he allowed it in.

 

[zappasguitar]

Dear dumbass; it is irrelevant what happened AFTER the shooting. But you're a moonbat moron of epic proportions, how can anyone expect you to have a cogent thought, let alone think at all.

How can anyone expect me to have a cogent thought?

Well for one, I can form a complete sentence without resorting to vulgarity.

A feat you have YET to accomplish.

And yes, what the defendant did AFTER the shooting speaks to his guilt or innocence.

Someone who believes he is innocent doesn't flee the scene and subsequently wait 24 hours before phoning the police.

 

[zappasguitar]

Funny, the judge did not seem to think it was irrelevant... he allowed it in.

How DARE that Judge agree with my assessment.

Stand by for Defective Truth to start hurling some invective the Judge's way.

 

[Truth Detector]

Funny, the judge did not seem to think it was irrelevant... he allowed it in.

He can allow all the testimony he likes; but it is irrelevant in proving whether or not Dunn was guilty of first degree murder. Frankly, I don't see how it can even be remotely first degree when that requires pre-meditation and a motive.

This appears to be a spontaneous event prompted by an argument. The best they could have done is manslaughter.

I am amused that you think eating a pizza afterwards is relevant as to the actions that resulted in the death of this teen; other than using it to portray Dunn as a sociopath in an effort to convict him not based on facts, but based on bias.

But then, you're patently dumb when it comes to the law, economics and debate.

 

[Truth Detector]

How DARE that Judge agree with my assessment.

Stand by for Defective Truth to start hurling some invective the Judge's way.

LMAO; you truly are a dunce of epic proportions.

 

[cawacko]

Funny, the judge did not seem to think it was irrelevant... he allowed it in.

I love watching The First 48 on A&E and how the detectives conduct their investigations and watching their witness interrogations. I have seen them question people who have claimed self defense shootings why didn't you come forward sooner. Is there a set law for when one must come forward if they have shot someone in what they believe is self defense?

 

[Truth Detector]

Non-sequiter...has NOTHING to do with this case and you're just trying to divert the discussion.

It’s absolutely relevant to Jarod’s moronic argument; you’re just too painfully stupid to comprehend it. What else is new shit-for-brains?

Except it WASN'T A GROUP...it was ONE LONE YOUTH.

Wrong again shit-for-brains; read up and get back to me when you find anything saying this teen was alone at the time.

More proof what an incredibly arrogant uninformed dumbass you are.

You can't even get the most basic of facts straight, yet you rail at Jarod for his Bias.

LMAO; see above dunce.

Yeah...the "threat" of loud music.

Wrong again shit-for-brains; but thank you for once again removing any doubt what a profound moron you are.

The defendant was just another coward whose gun made him brave.

Says you; but then you are a painfully stupid uninformed dunce stuck permanently on stupid.

Except you're not. You CLEARLY feel the defendant is innocent.

No I do not; I think that it was a terribly tragic event that did not need to occur by either party. But I refuse to adjudicate the a person’s guilt on a public forum or in the media; that is the realm of idiots like you who seldom think but rather, emote and utter incredibly stupid things.