Time to push back against the global warming Nazis

cancel2 2022

Canceled
February 20th, 2014 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.



Yeah, somebody pushed my button.

When politicians and scientists started calling people like me “deniers”, they crossed the line. They are still doing it. They indirectly equate (1) the skeptics’ view that global warming is not necessarily all manmade nor a serious problem, with (2) the denial that the Nazi’s extermination of millions of Jews ever happened. Too many of us for too long have ignored the repulsive, extremist nature of the comparison. It’s time to push back. I’m now going to start calling these people “global warming Nazis”.

The pseudo-scientific ramblings by their leaders have falsely warned of mass starvation, ecological collapse, agricultural collapse, overpopulation…all so that the masses would support their radical policies. Policies that would not voluntarily be supported by a majority of freedom-loving people. They are just as guilty as the person who cries “fire!” in a crowded theater when no fire exists. Except they threaten the lives of millions of people in the process. Like the Nazis, they advocate the supreme authority of the state (fascism), which in turn supports their scientific research to support their cause (in the 1930s, it was superiority of the white race). Dissenting scientific views are now jack-booted through tactics like pressuring scientific journals to not publish papers with which they disagree…even getting journal editors to resign.

Like the Nazis, they are anti-capitalist. They are willing to sacrifice millions of lives of poor people at the altar of radical environmentalism, advocating expensive energy policies that increase poverty. And if there is a historically demonstrable threat to humanity, it is poverty. I’m not talking about those who think we should be working toward new forms of energy to eventually displace our dependence of fossil fuels. Even I believe in that; after all, fossil fuels are a finite resource. I’m instead talking about the extremists. They are the ones who are sure they are right, and who are bent on forcing their views upon everyone else. Unfortunately, the extremists are usually the only ones you hear from in the media, because they scream the loudest and make the most outrageous claims. They invoke “consensus”, which results from only like-minded scientists who band together to support a common cause.

This authoritarianism tends to happen with an over-educated elite class…I have read that Nazi Germany had more PhDs per capita than any other country. I’m not against education, but it seems like some of the stupidest people are also the most educated. So, as long as they continue to call people like me “deniers”, I will call them “global warming Nazis”. I didn’t start this fight…they did. Yeah, somebody pushed my button.

About

Roy.jpg


Roy W. Spencer received his Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981. Before becoming a Principal Research Scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2001, he was a Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites. Dr. Spencer’s work with NASA continues as the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He has provided congressional testimony several times on the subject of global warming.

Dr. Spencer’s research has been entirely supported by U.S. government agencies: NASA, NOAA, and DOE. He has never been asked by any oil company to perform any kind of service. Not even Exxon-Mobil.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/time-to-push-back-against-the-global-warming-nazis/
 
Because you know lowering carbon emissions is just like killing six million Jews and god knows how many others!

Only tommy would even post such shit!
 
The OP can correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the comparison is to the extremism of Nazi philosophy, and its use of propaganda for political reasons?
 
The OP can correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the comparison is to the extremism of Nazi philosophy, and its use of propaganda for political reasons?

Well of course it is, the climate alarmists have been comparing sceptics to Holocaust deniers for years and he is just giving some of it back.
 
The title speaks for itself: "Time to push back against the global warming Nazis"

I agree that's the title, and then the author goes on to explain the comparison. The Global Warming community has for years called those who are skeptics of their POV, "deniers", as in Holocaust Deniers. The author is just showing them the same courtesy as it were.
 
I agree that's the title, and then the author goes on to explain the comparison. The Global Warming community has for years called those who are skeptics of their POV, "deniers", as in Holocaust Deniers. The author is just showing them the same courtesy as it were.

They can dish it out but they can't take it, more power to his elbow I say.
 
They can dish it out but they can't take it, more power to his elbow I say.

Whoever controls energy controls economies. A shift from oil to green energy is about shifting power, not about the environment. Not to say there are not earnest people involved in green energy, only that they are being badly used. Politics and science should never mix agendas; Global Warming being a prime example of why.
 
I agree that's the title, and then the author goes on to explain the comparison. The Global Warming community has for years called those who are skeptics of their POV, "deniers", as in Holocaust Deniers. The author is just showing them the same courtesy as it were.

You mean the grovelers to big business also grovelled to Hitler? True enough. Did their intellectual ancestors call decent people 'Jew-killers' then?
 
Whoever controls energy controls economies. A shift from oil to green energy is about shifting power, not about the environment. Not to say there are not earnest people involved in green energy, only that they are being badly used. Politics and science should never mix agendas; Global Warming being a prime example of why.



you have a point.

BUT


any energy we use will have to mix politics and science.


We need to make sure none of the sociopaths are allowed into power.



leaders MUST be smart and compassionate.


No more assholes who claim compassion makes you irrational.


It will kill the entire right in this country but that is OK they carry a philosophy that is insane.


They can just pick a less insane philosophy.


then the world will be a batter place
 
Dude has flipped flopped on his world philosophy about 3 or 4 times since Ive known him.

He just flops like a fish on the deck
 
Back
Top