Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
LOL, a radio/telephone procedure reference. I just had a conversation with someone about whether anyone actually pronounces 3,5, and 9 properly.
Raising Taxes On The Rich Would Reduce Income Inequality
- Thread starter Yoda
- Start date
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Not sure how you came to that conclusion, I'm not sure; because the "ghey" referred to your behavior.
Or how about reducing taxes for everyone and shutting down unnecessary government offices? That seems really quite nice.
evince
Truthmatters
you flop like a fish on a deck.
this country has seen great economic times for ALL when the tax rates are higher.
FOR ALL dude.
You see the wealthy don't need more money to be happy.
they just got a huge infusion of cash from the crash.
time to Fix the country so they don't just sit on their piles of money and destroy any possibility of the next boom.
for there to be a next boom the wealthy have to get their money moving.
its does no one any good just sitting in vault.
Its just paper huh.
when you spend it into the economy the wealthy make money huh?
it represents work and goods.
if you don't buy work and goods with it all it is is protection for one person.
no buyers means no next boom.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Where do liberals get this notion that the rich just sit on their money in a vault?
Even if they did, raising taxes wouldn't touch that money. We don't tax wealth. We tax income.
Why are so many lefties so financially illiterate?
Even if they did, raising taxes wouldn't touch that money. We don't tax wealth. We tax income.
Why are so many lefties so financially illiterate?
maineman
Banned
tree, fife, niner?
LMAO; you really are THAT incredibly stupid. No wonder you supported Obama.
maineman
Banned
Are you suggesting that money does not make money?
and how about your LiHEAP lie? ready to admit that you really are a lying sack of shit who can't even remember what he posts in one thread from day to day?
Is that what I am suggesting dishonest dunce? Try again. This time attempt to engage your brain before your fingers.
Still stuck on stupid I see. Dunce.
maineman
Banned
well... I started out by saying...
to which you did, in fact, reply:
So tell me... what is stupid about that statement. Are you suggesting that rich people's money does not make them money?
And you can't quite muster up the integrity to admit that you fucked up about LiHEAP benefits yesterday. Why am I not surprised? You are such a pathetic loser.
:lol:
Dear dishonest asshole; it has been explained to you a thousand times and you continue to NOT comprehend the difference between wealth, and income, nor the tax treatment of investments versus income.
What makes you think, an oxymoron in your case, that the one thousand and one time will finally sink into that thick empty leftist cranium of yours?
It is painfully obvious you don't know what you are talking about. You epitomize the axiom of why one should never attempt to engage an idiot.
It is the same case with your dimwiited arguments that Government can use the tax code to reduce income inequality; the argument is too stupid to be taken seriously. But no matter how many times it is explained to you, you'll still ask the same dumb dishonest question because comprehending and thinking are just not part of the partisan stupidity that tends to erupt from your fingers.
maineman
Banned
Just to refresh your memory - which seems to be suffering greatly this morning
LIAR!
you did say precisely what you tried to later claim that you did not say.
You're a moron and a liar. Wouldn't you be forced to agree?
LIAR!
you did say precisely what you tried to later claim that you did not say.
You're a moron and a liar. Wouldn't you be forced to agree?
You're still stuck on stupid Comrade.
maineman
Banned
I never said that investment income was treated identically to regular wages and salaries. Investment income is still income... it is an incremental addition to a wealthy person's wealth.... just like his salary is, or the capital gains he earns from the sale of assets.
and you can claim to have answered my question a thousand times, but you have yet to actually answer it once. How can the post tax income differential between high income people and less than high income people NOT diminish by applying a progressive income tax?
maineman
Banned
not so... I will point this lie of your out periodically until you have the integrity to admit that you lied.
You're a liar. It's right there. You said one thing and then, later in the day, you claimed you never said it. liar. moron. dunce. shit-for-brains. pathetic loser.
Of course you will; because as a hypocrite and dishonest dunce who whined about gotchya's on this thread, it is all you can glom onto after being exposed as an ignorant dunce who doesn't know what he is talking about in this thread.
You're stuck permentntly on that special brand of stupid you bring to every thread. You lost the argument, so now you glom onto an issue that you falsely portray and has nothing to do with the topic. This is what dishonest idiots do; avoid topics, avoid facts, advance strawman claims and wallow in a never ending circle of stupidity changing claims and asking the same stupid questions over and over again, in addition to never honestly answering any questions asked of them.
I'll prove it again; how has the income of Bill Gates or Steven jobs caused the income inequality Liberal dunces rail about? How many poor people did their efforts cause? How many low paying jobs were the result of their efforts?
The honest answer is that the wealth these individuals created as a result of their efforts and ideas created more wealth and LESS inequality. Yet dunces like you point your finger at them and declare their wealth as unfair and then stupidly demand the Government take more of that wealth foolishly claiming that this will miraculously reduce "income inequality" based on nothing more substantive than "because you say so" using your laughably stupid version of math and declarations of "after tax income".
It never occurs to you that when efforts like these are made, they will do NOTHING to change income inequality but instead, increase it. Income inequality is the result of Government efforts that destroy investment activity, restrict economic growth and make excuses for the failure of our educational systems to graduate literate and competent citizens.
Arrogant Liberal dunces constantly promote the idiotic claim that people are too stupid to take care of themselves and therefore, need Liberal intellectuals who should be entitled to run Government because they care more than anyone else on the planet to tell them what they need and provide it to them by taking it from those who earn it.
It is a stupid and failed agenda that has historically failed everywhere it is practiced. You haven't showed how income inequality is an issue caused by the rich; you've removed any doubt your a dunce of epic proportions who hasn't the first clue what you are talking about.
maineman
Banned
you are proving a point that is not in question. How can the post tax income differential between high income people and less than high income people NOT diminish by applying a progressive income tax? THAT is the question I want you to attempt to answer, if you can.
and you're still a liar who won't admit it. Does LiHEAP benefit its recipients, or doesn't it? Which statement of yours was a lie?
and while you're at it... is the new NFL rule aimed at white people solely or not? you ran away from your own double speak on that thread as well. coward. pussy. shit-for-brains.
and you're still a liar who won't admit it. Does LiHEAP benefit its recipients, or doesn't it? Which statement of yours was a lie?
and while you're at it... is the new NFL rule aimed at white people solely or not? you ran away from your own double speak on that thread as well. coward. pussy. shit-for-brains.
Still stuck on stupid I see; I asked you why income differential/inequality is an issue and how the rich are to blame? Try to be honest for once in your pathetic life and answer the question honestly without the dishonest stupidity that constantly erupts from your keyboard.
Again; what does LiHEAP have to do with taxing the rich to reduce income inequality?