Yes and the words state that the John Cook et al report claiming a 97% consensus was yet another highly selective and spurious attempt to cover up the facts. If you are able to refute the statement then go ahead but I somehow doubt that you will, preferring to snipe from the sidelines instead. I am also well aware that there are many that cannot read scientific papers hence it is often easier to present bright shiny stuff instead, softly softly catchee monkey as the saying goes.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.