Conservatives Outraged!

[Rune]

They mean the same thing. Duh. Another dumb lefty.

Really?

Thanks, you failed the normal knowledge challenge. Even children in elementary school know the the 1700s were the 18th century, the 1800s were the 19th, etc.

Remember the century from 1-99? that was the first century. 100-199 was the second century. Get it now?

Since we are in the process of educating your incredibly dumb ass, everything you have said in this thread indicates you are a 21st century racist retard who should hang his head in shame and never post on the internet again.

 

[Rune]

I'll have to answer this timorrow, I have to fix a sink right now. I'm still laughing over the guy who asked me if I meant the 18th century or the 1800's like there was a difference. Defeating lefties is like shooting crippled fish in a barrel.

Maybe take some spelling lesson too, timorrow.

Congratulations, you are officially the new village idiot.

 

[Rune]

You mistyped that.
The word should have been WERE.

Really? The Pierces (Dubbya's grandparrents) were nazi sympathizers. Do you think they were liberals?

 

[Rune]

Stop with this old canard.

The most vocal proponents of affirmative action are white women?

Opponents of affirmative action are portrayed as "sexist"?

No.

No, opponents of affirmative action are viewed as Racists. As follows; Taft=racist.

 

[Taft2016]

Yes but people who think like you do are to blame for the continued existence of racism.

Of course I am. Which is why, like most white supremacists, I am in an interracial marriage.

But please, do carry on.... it is mindless knee-jerk responses like yours to thoughtful observations that will ultimately rid the world of racism.

 

[Taft2016]

No, opponents of affirmative action are viewed as Racists. As follows; Taft=racist.

Which was my point dumbass. Sun Devil said affirmative action is really about white women.

*sigh*

Please stop responding to posts you obviously don't understand. You're interrupting the discussion.

 

[Rune]

So for a film to tell an accurate and complete account of the slavery era, what are some of the elements that would be needed?

*It would need to include accounts of Africans capturing other Africans and selling them into slavery

Yep and white people routinely perpetrate evil against other whites for money too. Your point? Nevermind, your point is to try to distract from the point.

*It would need to include accounts of Muslims raiding European seacoast villages, American ships, and capturing and selling over 1 million white people into slavery. When Thomas Jefferson protested this practice, he was told by the Turkish ambassador to Tripoli that it was a Muslim's "right and duty to make war upon them (non-Muslims) wherever they could be found, and to enslave them as many as they could take as prisoners."

Still is. Read the news lately? Again, your point? Oops, forgot. Pointless point is pointless.

Barbary pirates raided Ireland (the sack of Baltimore for example), Iceland (e.g. Grindavik), and all around the Mediterranean.

*It wouldn't scrub out other embarrassing historical anecdotes. Steve Spielberg's "Amistad," for instance, completely omitted the historical accounts of the lead mutineer himself going on to become a slaver.

Point being?

*It would also acknowledge the United States had a justice system that allowed a fair hearing to the Amistad mutineers, something Africans did not provide for themselves on their own continent.

*It would point out that enslavement of Africans was not begun by the white race, but was recognized as evil and eliminated by the white race.

You are actually claiming slavery has been eradicated and by the white race? Idiot. If anything, whites remain the greatest slavers to this day.

*It would also point out that slavery continues to this day on the African continent.

As elsewhere around the world, including here, where it may be illegal but is still practiced.

But of course, speaking up for my race earns me nothing except the label "racist." African-Americans and Muslims don't have to defend their ancestors' sins, because anyone who dares mention them is dismissed as a "racist."

No, anyone who defends acts of racism and slavery *IS* a racist.

Which is fine and nothing new. But until liberals are willing to discuss the issue any deeper than their usual Tarzan-like grunts of "Black good, white bad," intelligent discourse is always going to be one-sided.

Yes, your version is and will always remain one-sided, the wrong side.

 

[Rune]

Of course I am. Which is why, like most white supremacists, I am in an interracial marriage.

But please, do carry on.... it is mindless knee-jerk responses like yours to thoughtful observations that will ultimately rid the world of racism.

Why don't you go ahead and post which two races are involved in your "marriage" (both of you being male doesn't qualify as inter-racial).

 

[Taft2016]

Why don't you go ahead and post which two races are involved in your "marriage" (both of you being male doesn't qualify as inter-racial).

So we can add "homophobe" to your growing list that already includes; racist, stupid, and illiterate.

 

[Rune]

So we can add "homophobe" to your growing list that already includes; racist, stupid, and illiterate.

Is that your answer?
Answer the question Taffy.

While you are at it, show how my comment makes me a homophobe.

 

[Rune]

Of course I am. Which is why, like most white supremacists, I am in an interracial marriage.

But please, do carry on.... it is mindless knee-jerk responses like yours to thoughtful observations that will ultimately rid the world of racism.

So which two races are involved? You don't have to identify which one is you...

But I can answer for you, since you refuse. You are white and your wife is Asian, correct?

 

[Phantasmal]

This!

It's really the untold story of slavery. I am sure Michael McMoore will be making a movie about it anytime now.

There have been movies made about the plight of the northern factory workers and the miners. It is a common story in our history about when a few people control the power and all the assets.

It is a history we are sadly doomed to repeat because of people who unknowingly collaborate with the power holders, the greedy and those who see it as the natural order.

 

[Taft2016]

Is that your answer?
Answer the question Taffy.

I don't want to discuss my family any further.

While you are at it, show how my comment makes me a homophobe.

You're joking, right? We're up to about 15 pages now of calling me a racist without a bit of cause, and you're going to start whining about this?

GTFOH.

 

[Taft2016]

There have been movies made about the plight of the northern factory workers and the miners. It is a common story in our history about when a few people control the power and all the assets.

It is a history we are sadly doomed to repeat because of people who unknowingly collaborate with the power holders, the greedy and those who see it as the natural order.

Just for fun, let's reverse the roles of history and see how it plays out:

Suppose black slaves were used on the picket lines to unionize and get better working conditions for the workers up north. Suppose hundreds of thousands of these blacks were killed in the efforts, and their families were left destitute. And suppose 150 years later, descendents of those black freedom fighters were still being blamed for the poor working conditions endured by the white northern workers.

That's the basic formula in place. So it should make sense working either way, yet it doesn't. Does it?

 

[Phantasmal]

I'll have to answer this timorrow, I have to fix a sink right now. I'm still laughing over the guy who asked me if I meant the 18th century or the 1800's like there was a difference. Defeating lefties is like shooting crippled fish in a barrel.

The 1700's was the 18th century, the 1800's was the 19th century, the 1900's was the 20th century.

The 18th century and the 1800's are different.

Not too bad for a crippled fish, huh!

 

[Rune]

I don't want to discuss my family any further.



You're joking, right? We're up to about 15 pages now of calling me a racist without a bit of cause, and you're going to start whining about this?

GTFOH.

Then you shouldn't have used yourself as an example. Since you refuse to answer, it must and will be assumed that you are lying.

 

[maineman]

most mail order brides are asian....

 

[Rune]

You're joking, right? We're up to about 15 pages now of calling me a racist without a bit of cause, and you're going to start whining about this?

GTFOH.

I am hardly whining, I just want you to explain your accusation. You see, the things I am accusing you of are with cause. So, do you have cause or not?

 

[Taft2016]

Then you shouldn't have used yourself as an example. Since you refuse to answer, it must and will be assumed that you are lying.

Fine. And until you post pictures of your coneheaded kids with alleged birth defects, I'll assume you're lying too.

 

[Rune]

most mail order brides are asian....

Yes, and it explains his guilt about slavery, since he bought his wife he feels guilty, since deep down inside he feels ownership and can't correlate his innate pleasure at the thought with his white guilt and the fact that he lives in uber-liberal New York. (Queens no less)