Retirement: A third have less than $1,000 put away

For this question I wasn't thinking minimum wage earners. I was thinking someone who earns $30K - $50K/yr. I was curious what other options you had in mind, other than savings accounts, for someone in that $30-$50k range that isn't going to get eaten up by low interest rates.

For retirement? 401k or IRA. But people don't use them because they don't earn enough money.
 
you lied about it being fact huh.


Its an observed FACT


I also observed it in my life.

You didn't


why?

for the same reason you though that post was directed at you personally.

When did I "lie about it being fact?"

First of all, a study doesn't make it "fact." There are contradictory studies for many topics; conclusions don't make them fact. Second, all you had given was your opinion.

So, where have I "lied about facts?"
 
Why in the market of course... via those 401k's he mocks. Or perhaps he thinks they will do better in the market on their own?

I don't mock 401ks as a good investment vehicle. I mock them as a good public policy and a replacement for the defined benefit pension.
 
You were presenting an utterly stupid claim; that Government deficits have something to do with economic outcomes.

They absolutely do. Government deficits directly affect investor confidence, which affects the market, which affects jobs & retirement.

It's a pretty simple equation, dopey.
 
So you think they are good investment vehicles and thus we shouldn't use them to save for retirement?

No. I think they are good investment vehicles and we should use them to save for retirement. But most people don't use them becuase they don't make enough money and would be a whole lot better off with a defined benefit pension.
 
I don't mock 401ks as a good investment vehicle. I mock them as a good public policy and a replacement for the defined benefit pension.

Why do you think all employers can provide a defined benefit pension? What about all of the "defined benefit pensions" that are seriously underfunded and bankruptcies that end any companies obligations?
 
No. I think they are good investment vehicles and we should use them to save for retirement. But most people don't use them becuase they don't make enough money and would be a whole lot better off with a defined benefit pension.

Who are all these people who don't make enough to use them? Most small companies cannot afford a "Defined benefit pension". What happens to these "defined pensions" when the companies underfunding them go bankrupt?

I'm rather amused that you believe that a company is not taking the cost of managing such "defined benefit programs" out of the compensation of those they employ. Do you think it is just "extra" money the employees get?
 
I don't mock 401ks as a good investment vehicle. I mock them as a good public policy and a replacement for the defined benefit pension.

super cant think that way.

Its all bad if the left likes it and all good if Koch brothers pay to advance the idea
 
Who are all these people who don't make enough to use them? Most small companies cannot afford a "Defined benefit pension". What happens to these "defined pensions" when the companies underfunding them go bankrupt?

Good point SS for everyone and MORE money put in by all the corps
 
and oh yeah no cons voted in who will GIVE that money away to corps if they can so people will starve
 
You fucks want the wealthy to pay nothing into the system that made them all wealthy.


why?

to PUNISH poor people?
 
They absolutely do. Government deficits directly affect investor confidence, which affects the market, which affects jobs & retirement.

It's a pretty simple equation, dopey.

Thats a fascinating claim considering the fact that we have seen the highest deficits in our nations history while the stock market has hit all time irrational record highs with no end in sight.

How does that fit into your pretty simple equation, dunce?

I'm also amused that you think there is a connection between what happens on Wallstreet, and job creation.
 
No. I think they are good investment vehicles and we should use them to save for retirement. But most people don't use them becuase they don't make enough money and would be a whole lot better off with a defined benefit pension.

So taking money forcefully out of their pockets and then mismanaging the pensions is a better option?
 
anigif_enhanced-buzz-25618-1366990007-21.gif
 
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about, SF.

Where do think the pension money comes from? It is a part of their compensation package. So instead of giving them the option of using the 401k, you instead take the money from salary and use towards a pension.
 
Back
Top