FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Another dumb question from ILA posted with a stupid New York Post article. New York Post: the only paper that, when you wipe it, you come back with more shit than when you started.
Non-trolls: Is Obama too weak to lead?
- Thread starter FUCK THE POLICE
- Start date
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Isn't it a Murdoch paper?
It takes a real moron to believe that Obama is a strong leader.
Only in loony liberal land is the New York times a bastion of honesty and objective reporting.
Where's the "Watermark is a retard" choice? That's a rhetorical question because we don't need a poll to determine that.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Obama has proven too weak to lead.
The question now is who to replace him with.
The question now is who to replace him with.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
I agree with Rand on this issue.
I agree with Rand on this issue.
Of course you do; you're just as naive and ignorant as he is.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Where to start? (1) "the Hawks in the Republican Party giving arms indiscriminately.". This is an outright lie; Obama runs the military and where arms go, not Congress. Of course, Rand is a dumbfuck of the same caliber and naiveté' as you.
(2) "They created these people." Another outright lie not based in facts or reality.
(3) "ISIS is all over Libya because Republican 'Hawks' loved Hillary Clinton's war in Libya." Another incredibly false and dumb claim that goes so far as to relieve the Commander and Chief any responsibility or culpability based on more stupid strawman claims.
Only an idiot like you would think that anything he erupted with was based on a fact or reality.
……any more stupid intellectually vapid questions TrollTARD?
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Other than your opinion/denial, do you have any factual refutation for Rands' statements?
I'll understand completely if you don't.
Those aren't "opinions TrollTARD; they are FACTS.
But your inability to support Rand’s comments, or refute mine, with any facts is noted. I understand you're incapable of defending your laughable trolling.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
They are? Where's your supporting substantiation?
Your inability to refute Rand’s comments with any facts is noted. I understand you're incapable of defending your laughable trolling.
Post some GIFs and capitalize TARD some more.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Watermark made NEITHER claim, but that doesn't stop Truth Rejector from making up more bullshit?
Of course it doesn't.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
All Truth Rejector EVER brings to the table is his opinion.
He simply does not do "factual refutation".
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Apparently not.
He states his opinion and then declares it to be fact.
Like Desh.
Dear dumbfuck; you don't have to remove any doubt of what a retard you are every single day of your pathetic life.
Ironic coming from two dumbfucks who do nothing BUT express their dimwitted opinions bereft of any facts or reality.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Post some more GIFs and capitalize TARD some more.
Dear dumbfuck; it is you and Rand who are making the stupid false claims; one cannot support a strawman assertion, therefore, it is incumbent upon you to prove they are true with something more than "because you say so."
Dear dumbfuck; one doesn't refute an outright fabrication. But again, you're a moron who thinks that you don't need to have any facts to support Rand’s stupid and false eruptions for purely political consumption from dullards and idiots like you.
This is a rather ironic statement from a prolific thread troll don't you think dumbfuck?
Even more irony coming from someone who spams the forum with GIFs in his prolific trolling; you have ZERO self-awareness like your dimwitted pal ZappasTard don't you dumbfuck?
I know; why don’t both of you CRY HARDER?