What if its not terrorism?

I don't think it was a bomb but the erratic flight path and the lack of any cockpit communication points to some kind of attack maybe even a suicide pilot.

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
Thing1 said:
If I'm Hillary & it turns out to not be terrorism, this becomes the campaign for me. I'd put Trump's comments in every commercial she puts out there, and hammer home that he doesn't have the temperament or restraint needed to be CIC.

In the poll yesterday, it is the public's biggest concern with him. And rightfully so - he never takes something in and thinks about it. He shoots from the hip on everything.
Click to expand...

I can't believe Crooked Hillary hasn't tapped you and GayRod to help run her campaign. I mean the strategy you two come up with. You both should really be teaching political science courses and not wasting all of that talent here.

Kudos
 
Teflon Don said:
I can't believe Crooked Hillary hasn't tapped you and GayRod to help run her campaign. I mean the strategy you two come up with. You both should really be teaching political science courses and not wasting all of that talent here.

Kudos
Click to expand...

The funny thing is neither of them will actually come out and support Hillary. I'm voting for Trump, I don't care what anyone thinks about it.

It's just a silly debate board lol.
 
Milagro said:
I don't think it was a bomb but the erratic flight path and the lack of any cockpit communication points to some kind of attack maybe even a suicide pilot.
Click to expand...

Aviation experts state that the sudden flight path alterations are standard procedure in the event of fire as an attempt drop quickly to an altitude conducive to air breathing. It is perfectly natural, they state , for pilots to be so engrossed in these manoeuvres that they do not speak.
You're a sad, sad attention-seeking know-nothing arse.
 
Jarod said:
So, the Paris to Cairo flight that crashed has an unknown cause at this time, but Dangerous Donald went out last night screaming about how it was terrorism and basically calling anyone who thought otherwise stupid.

Now, I suspect from what we know that it was terrorism, but is it really the right thing to do to go off half cocked calling it terrorism before we have solid evidence of it?

The fact is that ISIS has always claimed responsibility for things they do within hours of the event, they have not done so with this jet. In fact nobody creditable has done so, and terrorists usually do, it furthers their cause to claim it. As the hours tick bye, the possibility grows that its not terrorism.

My question becomes, if its not terrorism, will that further HRC's argument that Dangerous Donald is a loose cannon?

Remember we invaded Iraq on such loose assumptions!
Click to expand...

Dangerous Donald?

lol

Anyway - I find it refreshing to have a politician who comes right out and tells us what he thinks. I'm so sick of the generic (we are going to wait until we have all of the information) response. So no, this doesn't bother me at all.
.
 
Faleur said:
Dangerous Donald?

lol

Anyway - I find it refreshing to have a politician who comes right out and tells us what he thinks. I'm so sick of the generic (we are going to wait until we have all of the information) response. So no, this doesn't bother me at all.
.
Click to expand...

Who needs all that stinking information? Fale wants refreshing, shoot from the hip, wild conjecture.
YEEEEEEEEEE - HAAAAAAAAAAAW!
 
Leonthecat said:
Who needs all that stinking information? Fale wants refreshing, shoot from the hip, wild conjecture.
YEEEEEEEEEE - HAAAAAAAAAAAW!
Click to expand...

Yes, such wild conjecture that this was a terrorist attack. !!!

What an insane opinion!!

lol...

Don't quit your day job little bitch. You are one of the worst forum trolls I've ever seen.

By the way, who are you supporting for President? What kind of policies do you support? Or is your sole purpose on this board to run around personally provoking others? Because it seems you want to turn every discussion into a discussion about me personally and what I want - maybe it's time we talked about you personally for a change instead. Or can you not take your own medicine in this regard like your little butt buddy?
 
Last edited:
Leonthecat said:
Who needs all that stinking information? Fale wants refreshing, shoot from the hip, wild conjecture.
YEEEEEEEEEE - HAAAAAAAAAAAW!
Click to expand...


giphy.gif
 
It would seem that the pilot was in touch with air traffic control and told them he was going into a steep dive to put out a fire. So it's looking like an electrical fire caused by an incendiary device or cable fault. Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
It would seem that the pilot was in touch with air traffic control and told them he was going into a steep dive to put out a fire. So its us looking like an electrical fure caused by an incendiary device or cable fault.

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Incendiary device could be a bomb.

Why would going into a steep dive aid in putting out a fire? That would suggest the fire was on the outer hull or something. How could an electrical fire cause that?
 
Milagro said:
It would seem that the pilot was in touch with air traffic control and told them he was going into a steep dive to put out a fire. So its us looking like an electrical fure caused by an incendiary device or cable fault.

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

And now the needle falls back towards mechanical failure lol. I can't take this suspense.

*Jarod reaches for the Xanax bottle*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top