democrats reveal their crybaby tendencies

Darla said:
Funny how Ryan and his band are playing the new hit single "due process baby and I don't mean maybe" over and over, yet they have all strongly supported the watch lists forever. It's great to have watch lists, and keep people on it from flying, or under surveillance, but keep them from buying guns? Start banging the drums Bobby and I'll get my guitar! What a bunch of BS all around. If there are problems with the watch lists, fix it. Where were the demands to do so before now?

Do away with them? NO thank you, I will leave that circle jerk to the Libertarians and their bros on the pitchfork left.

Politically speaking, this bill won't pass. So this all misses the mark. It's a strong attempt to break the NRA stranglehold, get Republicans on record with their votes, flip the Senate, flip the Supreme Court with the next pick, and through them, fix the blood-soaked mess Heller gave us. Eventually to flip the house and pass a real, strong, assault weapons ban.

It's a long term strategy.
Click to expand...

Nothing new about it.
Sen. Ted Kennedy was forbidden to fly.
A list with no due process is a very onerours thing.
This was simply an opportunity to rectify an injustice and the Dems failed in spectacular fashion.

I am pro-gun rights but I would gladly go along with a no purchase list, provided there was a mechanism to appeal to a judge had one wrongly been placed on such list.
 
anatta said:
jesus Christ...you can't force a vote by a sit in..
looking at it more carefully though it looks like the sit in is over a break
and the Speaker pro tem had gaveled the session closed (on break)-so if that's all it is ,it's not as bad as I first thought
Click to expand...

I saw Fauxkahontas Warren participating in the sit in. I wonder if she was sitting Indian style.
 
CFM said:
I saw Fauxkahontas Warren participating in the sit in. I wonder if she was sitting Indian style.
Click to expand...
it's really not interrupting any House business -at first I thought it was ( all this happened overnight) so I can't get upset about it.

It's a political stunt, or an act of conscience depending on your p.o.v.
If the Dems wanna sleep in and eat cheeseburgers and Chinese food while the House is adjourned....
 
It's snacktime said:
this is why at least on this one issue conservatives are wise to liberal tactics. We know they aren't being honest when they say they just want "background checks." You give them an inch and they'll take a mile. Got a speeding ticket? No gun. Restraining order ever filed against you even though anyone can do that for anyone reason? No gun. etc
Click to expand...

They behave like they want to completely abolish due process, when it comes to gun ownership.
 
anatta said:
it's really not interrupting any House business -at first I thought it was ( all this happened overnight) so I can't get upset about it.

It's a political stunt, or an act of conscience depending on your p.o.v.
If the Dems wanna sleep in and eat cheeseburgers and Chinese food while the House is adjourned....
Click to expand...

so these democrat/domestic terrorists had their snacks delivered? must be nice to have approval for terrorism.
 
anatta said:
it's really not interrupting any House business -at first I thought it was ( all this happened overnight) so I can't get upset about it.

It's a political stunt, or an act of conscience depending on your p.o.v.
If the Dems wanna sleep in and eat cheeseburgers and Chinese food while the House is adjourned....
Click to expand...

Since it really served no purpose other than to be seen, I'll go with political stunt.
 
Rune said:
Really?
Another post totally devoid of fact or knowledge.

The house these days is like a library compared to previous centuries and yes, there are indeed parlimentary rules.
The Dems were utilizing them.
To be clear I do not support the Dems.

They should go along with the Pubes and provide due process to those on secret lists.
It is their innate love of power (totalitarianism) which prevents them from acting reasonable, therefore they will be equally at fault after the next shooting commited by a watch list member.
Click to expand...


Then you will have no problem in posting the part of Parliamentary Rules that allow for sit-ins.
 
Rune said:
Nothing new about it.
Sen. Ted Kennedy was forbidden to fly.
A list with no due process is a very onerours thing.
This was simply an opportunity to rectify an injustice and the Dems failed in spectacular fashion.

I am pro-gun rights but I would gladly go along with a no purchase list, provided there was a mechanism to appeal to a judge had one wrongly been placed on such list.
Click to expand...

The Democratic bill has that in it. Actually it may be Susan Collins' at this point, I'm not certain.
 
The sit-in has achieved real world-wide attention and approval. If nothing else it has torpedoed any chance of a Republican president. There are lots of real Americans in the world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top